This study addresses the effects of motivation and problem severity on outcomes in two court-baseddrug treatment programs. Data were examined for 578 offenders served by a drug court and223served by a drug treatment court mandated through California's Substance Abuse Crime Prevention Act (SACPA). It was hypothesized that client-reported motivation would be associated with severity of drug problems and that motivation would be positively associated, and severity negatively associated, with program completion and 12-month, postdischarge recidivism. The first hypothesis was supported— motivation for treatment, measured by client-reported need for treatment and acknowledgementof problemseverity, was associatedwith severity of druguse. Program completion in drug court was predicted by client motivation and prior jail time, whereas SACPA completion was predicted by severity of drug problems and prior employment. Recidivism was associated with program completion and problem severity but not treatment motivation in either program. Implications for court-based treatment programs and future research are discussed.
Belenko, S. (2001). Research on drug courts: A critical review. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
2.
Belenko, S. (2002). The challenges of conducting research in drug treatment court settings. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1635-1664.
3.
Booth, R. E., Corsi, K. F., & Mikulich-Gilbertson, S. K. (2004). Factors associated with metha done maintenance treatment retention among street-recruited injection drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 74, 177-185.
4.
Brecht, M. L., Anglin, M. D., & Jung-Chi, W. (1993).Treatmenteffectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19, 89-96.
5.
Burns, S. L., & Peyrot, M. (2003). Tough love: Nurturing and coercing responsibility and recovery in California drug courts. Social Problems, 50, 416-438.
6.
Cosden, M., Orliss, M., & Basch, J. (2003). Santa Barbara County substance abuse treatment courts: 1997-2002. Santa Barbara: University of California.
7.
DeLeon, G., & Jainchill, N. (1986).Circumstance, motivation, readiness and suitability as correlates of treatment tenure. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 18, 203-208.
8.
DeLeon, G., Melnick, G., & Kressel, D. (1997). Motivation and readiness for therapeutic community treatment among cocaine and other drug abusers. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 23, 169-189.
9.
Deschenes, E., Peters, R., Goldkamp, J., & Belenko, S. (2003). Drug courts. In J. Zweben (Ed.), Research to practice, practice to research: Promoting scientific-clinical interchange in drug abuse treatment (pp. 85-102).Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
10.
DiClemente, C. C., Bellino, L. E., & Neaving, T. M. (1999). Motivation for change and alcoholism treatment. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 86-92.
11.
Evans, E., & Longshore, D. (2004). Evaluation of the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: Treatment clients and program types during the first year of implementation. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, (Suppl. 2), 165-174.
12.
Farabee, D., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2001). Recovery and the criminal justice system. In F. M. Tims & C. G. Leukefeld (Eds.), Relapse and recovery in addictions (pp. 40-59). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Green, C. A., Polen, M. R., Dickinson, D. M., Lynch, F. L., & Bennett, M. D. (2002). Gender differences in predictors of initiation, retention, and completion in an HMO-based substance abuse treatment program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 285-295.
14.
Guydish, J., Wolfe, E., Tajima, B., & Woods, W. J. (2001). Drug court effectiveness: A review of California evaluation reports, 1995-1999. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 33, 369-378.
15.
Hardy, M., Teruya, C., Longshore, D., & Hser, Y.-I. (2005). Initial implementation of California's Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act: Findings from focus groups in ten counties. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 221-232.
16.
Harrison, L. D., & Scarpitti, F. R. (2002). Introduction: Progress and issues in drug treatment courts. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1441-1467.
17.
Hartley, R. E., & Phillips, R. C. (2001). Who graduates from drug courts? Correlates of client success. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 107-119.
18.
Hora, P. F. (2002).A dozenyears ofdrugtreatmentcourts:Uncoveringourtheoreticalfoundation and the construction of a mainstream paradigm. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1469-1488.
19.
Hser, Y., Huang, D., Teruya, C., & Anglin, M. D. (2004). Diversity of drug abuse treatment utilization patterns and outcomes. Evaluation & Program Planning, 27, 309-319.
20.
Huddleston, C. W., Freeman-Wilson, K., & Boone, D. L. (2004). Painting the current picture: A national report card on drug courts and other problem solving court programs in the United States. National Drug Court Institute, 1, 1-16.
21.
Lang, M. A., & Belenko, S. (2000). Predicting retention in a residential drug treatment alternative to prison program. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19, 145-160.
22.
Lawental, E., McLellan, A. T., Grissom, G. R., Brill, P., & O'Brien, C. (1996).Coerced treatment for substance abuse problems detected through workplace urine surveillance: Is it effective?Journal of Substance Abuse, 8, 115-128.
23.
Leonhard, C., Mulvey, K., Gastfriend, D. R., & Shwartz, M. (2000). The Addiction Severity Index: A field study of internal consistency and validity. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 129-135.
24.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., Wenzel, S., Morral, A., Harrell, A., McBride, D., et al. (2001). Drug courts: A conceptual framework. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 7-26.
25.
Marlowe, D. B., Glass, D. J., Merikle, E. P., Festinger, D. S., DeMatteo, D. S., Marczyk, G. R., et al. (2001). Efficacy of coercion in substance abuse treatment. In F. M. Tims, C. G. Leukefeld, & J. J. Platt (Eds.), Relapse and recovery in addictions (pp. 208-227). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26.
Marlowe, D. B., Kirby, K. C., Bonieskie, L. M., Glass, D. J., Dodds, L. D., Husband, S. D., et al. (1996). Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 42, 77-84.
27.
Marlowe, D. B., Merikle, E. P., Kirby, K. C., Festinger, D. S., & McLellan, A. T. (2001). Multidimensionalassessment of perceived treatment-entrypressuresamongsubstanceabusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 97-108.
28.
Marshall, G. N., & Hser, Y. (2002). Characteristics of criminal justice and noncriminal justice clients receiving treatment for substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 179-192.
29.
McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Metzer, D., Peters, R., Smith, I., Grissom, G., et al. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199-213.
30.
Miller, N. S., & Flaherty, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences): A review of the clinical research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 9-16.
31.
O'Callaghan, F., Sonderegger, N., & Klag, S. (2004). Drug and crime cycle: Evaluating traditional methods versus diversion strategies for drug-related offences. Australian Psychologist, 39, 188-200.
32.
Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 72-96.
33.
Polcin, D. L. (2001). Drug and alcohol offenders coerced into treatment: A review of modalities and suggestions for research on social model programs. Substance Use & Misuse, 36, 589-608.
34.
Polcin, D. L., & Weisner, C. (1999). Factors associated with coercion in entering treatment for alcohol problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 54, 63-68.
35.
Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1984). The transtheoretical approach: Crossing boundaries of therapy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
36.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. American Psychologist, 47, 1102-1114.
37.
Rapp, R. C., Li, L.,Siegal, H. A., & DeLiberty, R. N. (2003).Demographicandclinical correlates of client motivation among substance abusers. National Association of Social Workers, 28(2), 107-115.
38.
Roberts, A. C., & Nishimoto, R. H. (1996). Predicting treatment retention of women dependent on cocaine. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 22, 313-324.
39.
Ryan, R. M., Plant, R. W., & O'Malley, S. (1995).Initial motivations for alcohol treatment: Relations with patient characteristics, treatment involvement, and dropout. Addictive Behaviors, 20, 279-297.
40.
Sanford, J. S., & Arrigo, B. A. (2005). Lifting the cover on drug courts: Evaluation findings and policy concerns. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 239-259.
41.
Scrivener-Mateyoke, A., Webster, J. M., Staton, M., & Leukefeld, C. (2004).Treatmentretention predictors of drug court participants in a rural state. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 30, 605-626.
42.
Shen, Q., McLellan, A. T., & Merrill, J. C. (2000). Client's perceived need for treatment and its impact on outcome. Substance Abuse, 21, 179-192.
43.
Simoneau, H., & Bergeron, J. (2003). Factors affecting motivation during the first six weeks of treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1219-1241.
44.
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Broome, K. M. (2002). A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 538-544.
45.
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Brown, B. S. (1997). Treatment retention and follow-up outcomes in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11, 294-307.
46.
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Greener, J. M. (1997). Drug abuse treatment process components that improve retention. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 14, 565-572.
47.
Stark, M. J., Haiou, H., Booth, R., Smith, R., McAnulty, J., Stevens, S. J., et al. (1996).Correlates and consequences of entering drug treatment: A study of the NIDA Cooperative Agreement National Database. Drugs & Society, 9, 199-212.
48.
Sung, H.-E., Belenko, S., & Feng, L. (2001). Treatment compliance in the trajectory of treatment progress among offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 153-162.
49.
Sung, H.-E., Belenko, S., Feng, L., & Tabachnick, C. (2004). Predicting treatment noncompliance among criminal justice-mandated clients: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26, 13-26.
50.
Wenzel, S. L., Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Ridgely, M. S. (2001).Drugcourts:A bridgebetween criminal justice and health services. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 241-253.
51.
Wolf, E., Guydish, J., & Termondt, J. (2002).A drug court outcome evaluation comparingarrests in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 1155-1172.
52.
Young, D. (2002). Impacts of perceived legal pressure on retention in drug treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 27-55.
53.
Young, D., & Belenko, S. (2002). Program retention and perceived coercion in three models of mandatory drug treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 297-328.
