Usinga sample of White and Native Americanhigh school students, the authors provide a test of (a) self-control theory's invariance thesis and (b) native traditionalism as an explanation of Native American substance use. Self-control significantly influenced all forms of substance use when controlling for race and in race-specific analyses. However,z tests by race revealed that self-control is a stronger predictor of marijuana and serious drug use among Native Americans. Beyond this simple comparison across groups, the authors control for native traditionalism (as a proxy for cultural variation) among the Native American respondents. In doing so, self-control remained a consistent predictor of their substance use. Although these findings largely support the invariance thesis of self-control, the racial difference related to marijuana and serious drug use poses a theoretical challenge. With regard to native traditionalism, results suggest that those most attached to their native traditions engage in greater substance use.
Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1999). Evaluating the unidimensionality and invariance of “low self-control.”Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 307-331.
2.
Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225-247.
3.
Bachman, G. G., Wallace, J. M., Jr., & O'Malley, P. M. (1991). Racial/ethnic differences in smoking, drinking, and illicit drug use among American high school seniors, 1976-89. Journal of Public Health, 81, 372-377.
4.
Bachman, R. (1991). Death and violence on the reservation: Homicide, family violence, and suicide in American Indian populations. Lexington, MA: Auburn House.
5.
Backover, A. (1991).Native Americans:Alcoholism, FAS putrace at risk. Guidepost, 16, 1-6.
6.
Beauvais, F. (1992). Comparison of drug use rates for reservation Indian, non-reservation Indian and Anglo youth. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 5, 12-31.
7.
Beauvais, F. (1996). Trends in drug use among American Indian students and dropouts, 1975-1994. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 1594-1598.
8.
Beauvais, F. (1998). American Indians and alcohol. Alcohol Health and Research World, 22, 253-260.
9.
Beauvais, F., & LaBoueff, S. (1985). Drug and alcohol abuse intervention in American Indian communities. International Journal of Addictions, 20, 139-171.
10.
Bynum, J. E. (1987). Suicide and the American Indian: An analysis of recent trends. In H. Bahr, B. Chadwick, & R. Day (Eds.), Native Americans today (pp. 367-377). New York: Harper and Row.
11.
Campos-Outcalt, D., Ellis, J., & Aickin, M. (1995). Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in a southwestern Native American tribe. Public Health Reports, 10, 742-748.
12.
Caspi, A., Moffit, T. E., Silva, P. A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Krueger, R. F., & Schmutte, P. S. (1994). Are some people crime-prone? Replications of the personality-crime relationship across countries, genders, races, and methods. Criminology, 32, 163-195.
13.
Chan, K. S., & Osthimer, B. (1983). Navajo youth and early school withdrawal: A case study. Los Alamitos, CA: National Center for Bilingual Research.
14.
Clark, J. R. (1996).No reservation aboutgangs: Urban youth-crimeprobleminfects Indiancountry. Law Enforcement News, 22, 1-1, 6-6.
15.
Cochran, J. K., Wareham, J., Wood, P. B., & Arneklev, B. J. (2002). Is the school attachment/ commitment-delinquency relationship spurious?: An exploratory test of arousal theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 25, 49-70.
16.
Cochran, J. K., Wood, P. B., Sellers, C. S., Wilkerson, W., & Chamlin, M. B. (1998). Academic dishonesty and low self-control: An empirical test of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 19, 227-255.
17.
Costello, E. J., Farmer, E. M. Z.,Angold, A., Burns, B. J., & Erkanli, A. (1997).Psychiatricdisorders among American Indian and White youth in Appalachia: The Great Smoky Mountains Study. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 827-832.
18.
Dana, R. H. (1993). Multicultural assessment perspectives for professional psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Deyhle, D. (1989). Pushouts and pullouts: Navajo and Ute school leavers. Journal of Navajo Education, 6, 36-51.
20.
Duran, E., & Duran, B. (1995). Native American postcolonial psychology. Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
Executive Committee for Indian Country Law Improvements. (1997). Final report to the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Interior. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
22.
Forde, D. R., & Kennedy, L. W. (1997).Risky lifestyles, routine activities, and the general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 14, 265-294.
23.
Fredrick, C. J. (1973). Suicide, homicide, and alcoholism among American Indians: Guidelines for help. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
24.
Gibbs, J. J., & Giever, D. (1995). Self-control and its manifestations among university students: An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory. Justice Quarterly, 12, 231-255.
25.
Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Martin, J. S. (1998).Parental managementand self-control:An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 40-70.
26.
Goldblatt, M. (1998). Getting a grip on gangs: Tribes dish up tough love to stop gang membership. American Indian Report, 14, 26-27.
27.
Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
29.
Greenfeld, L. A., & Smith, S. K. (1999). American Indians and crime. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
30.
Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control, and delinquency. Criminology, 39, 707-736.
31.
Henry, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. (1996). Temperamental and familial predictors of violent and nonviolent criminal convictions: Age 3 to 18. Developmental Psychology, 32, 614-623.
32.
Herring, R. D. (1994).Substance use among Native American Indianyouth:A selected review of causality. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 578-592.
33.
Hirschi, T. (1994). Family. In T. Hirschi & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), The generality of deviance (pp. 47-69). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
34.
Hisnanick, J. J., & Erickson, P. M. (1993). Hospital resource utilization by American Indians/ Alaska Natives for alcoholism and alcohol abuse. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 19, 387-397.
35.
Hwang, S., & Akers, R. L. (2003). Substance use by Korean adolescents: A cross-cultural test of social learning, social bonding, and self-control theories. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Sociallearningandthe explanationof crime: A guidefor the new century, advancesin criminological theory (Vol. 11, pp. 39-63). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
36.
Johnson, L., O'Malley, P., & Bachman, J. (1987). National trends in drug use and related factors among American high school students and young adults. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
37.
Keane, C., Maxim, P. S., & Teevan, J. J. (1993). Drinking and driving, self-control, and gender: Testinga generaltheoryofcrime. Journalof Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 30-46.
38.
Kerby, D. S., Brand, M. W., & John, R. (2003). Anger types and the use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco among Native American adolescents. Preventive Medicine, 37, 485-492.
39.
Killias, M., & Rabasa, J. (1997). Weapons and athletic constitution as factors linked to violence among male juveniles: Findings from the Swiss self-reported delinquency project. British Journal of Criminology, 37, 446-458.
40.
Kimball, E., Goldberg, H., & Oberle, M. (1996). The prevalence of selected risk factors for chronic disease among American Indians in Washington State. Public Health Reports, 111, 264-271.
41.
LaFromboise, T. D., Trimble, J. E., & Mohatt, G. V. (1990). Counseling intervention and American Indian tradition: An integrative approach. The Counseling Psychologist, 18, 628-654.
42.
LaGrange, T. C., & Silverman, R. A. (1999). Low self-control and opportunity: Testing the general theory of crime as an explanation for gender differences in delinquency. Criminology, 37, 41-72.
43.
Ledlow, S. (1992). Is cultural discontinuity an adequate explanation for dropping out?Journal of American Indian Education, 31, 21-36.
44.
Lester, D. (1999). Crime and the Native American. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
45.
Longshore, D., Stein, J. A., & Turner, S. (1998). Reliability and validity of a self-control measure: Rejoinder. Criminology, 36, 275-282.
46.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
47.
Mail, P. D., & Johnson, S. (1993).Boozing, sniffing, and toking: An overview of the past, present, and future of substance use by American Indians. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 5, 1-33.
48.
Mancall, P. C. (1995). Deadly medicine: Indians and alcohol in early America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
49.
Marcus, B. (2003). An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 674-706.
50.
Marcus, B. (2004).Self-controlin the generaltheoryofcrime:Theoreticalimplicationsofa measurement problem. Theoretical Criminology, 8, 33-55.
51.
Marcus, B., Schuler, H., Quell, P., & Huenpfner, G. (2002). Measuring counterproductivity: Development and initial validation of a German self-report questionnaire. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 18-35.
52.
May, P. A. (1982). Substance abuse and American Indians: Prevalence and susceptibility. International Journal of the Addictions, 17(7), 1185-1209.
53.
May, P. A. (1986). Alcohol and drug misuse prevention programs for Native Americans: Needs and opportunities. International Journal of the Addictions, 20, 139-171.
54.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. (2001).Structuralmodelsof personalityand their relationto antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 39, 765-798.
55.
Morris, C. H., Crowley, S. L., & Morris, C. T. (2002). A measure of traditionalism for American Indian children and families: Psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of the National Center, 10, 33-55.
56.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review, 3, 467-496.
57.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1994). Personal capital and social control: The deterrence implicationsofa theoryofindividualdifferencesin criminaloffending. Criminology, 32, 581-606.
58.
Nakhaie, M. R., Silverman, R. A., & LaGrange, T. C. (2000). Self-control and social control: An examination of gender, ethnicity, class and delinquency. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25, 35-39.
59.
Novins, D. K., & Mitchell, C. M. (1998).Factors associated with marijuana use among American Indian adolescents. Addiction, 93, 1693-1702.
60.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61.
Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1990). Adolescent drug use: Findings of national and local surveys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 385-485.
62.
Oetting, E. R., Beauvais, F., & Edwards, R. (1988).Alcohol and Indianyouth: Social and psychological correlates and prevention. Journal of Drug Issues, 18, 87-101.
63.
Ogbu, J. U. (1987). Variability in minority school performance: A problem in search of an explanation. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18, 312-334.
64.
Okwumabua, J. O., & Duryea, E. J. (1987). Age of onset, periods of risk, and patterns of progression in drug use among American Indian high school students. International Journal of Addiction, 22, 1269-1276.
65.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. R. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
66.
Piquero, A. R., MacIntosh, R., & Hickman, M. (2000). Does self-control affect survey response? Applying exploratory, confirmatory, and item response theory analysis to Grasmick et al. self-control scale. Criminology, 38, 897-929.
67.
Piquero, A. R., & Rosay, A. B. (1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al. self-control scale: A comment on Longshore. Criminology, 36, 157-174.
68.
Piquero, A. R., & Tibbetts, S. (1996).Specifyingthe directandindirecteffects oflow self-control and situational factors in decision-making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
69.
Plunkett, M., & Mitchell, C. M. (2000). Substance use rates among American Indian adolescents: Regionalcomparisonswith monitoringthe futurehighschoolseniors. Journalof Drug Issues, 30, 575-591.
70.
Polakowski, M. (1994).Linking self and social controlwith deviance: Illuminatingthe structure underlying a general theory of crime and its relation to deviant activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 41-78.
71.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000).The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
72.
Pulkkinen, L., & Hamalainen, M. (1995). Low self-control as a precursor to crime and accidents in a Finnish longitudinal study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 5, 424-438.
73.
Query, J. M. N. (1985). Comparative admission and follow-up study of American Indians & Whites in a youth chemical dependency unit on the north central plains. International Journal of the Addictions, 20, 489-502.
74.
Radosevich, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., Akers, R. L., & Krohn, M. D. (1979). The sociology of adolescent drug and drinking behavior: A review of the state of the field, part I. Deviant Behavior, 1, 15-35.
75.
Romero, E. J., Gomez-Fraguela, A., Luengo, M. A., & Sobral, J. (2003). The self-control construct in the general theory of crime: An investigation in terms of personality psychology. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 61-86.
76.
Scott, W. J. (1986). Attachment to Indian culture and the difficult situation: A study of American Indian college students. Youth and Society, 17, 381-395.
77.
Strand, G. C., Jr., & Garr, M. S. (1994). Driving under the influence. In T. Hirschi & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), The generality of deviance (pp.47-69). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
78.
Stylianou, S. (2002). The relationship between elements and manifestations of low self-control in a general theory of crime: Two comments and a test. Deviant Behavior, 23, 31-57.
79.
Tittle, C. R., Ward, D. A., & Grasmick, H. G. (2003). Gender, age, and crime/deviance: A challenge to self-control theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 426-453.
80.
Tracy, P. E., Wolfgang, M. E., & Figlio, R. M. (1990). Delinquency careers in two birth cohorts. New York: Plenum.
81.
Unger, J. B., Shakib, S., Cruz, T. B., Hoffman, B. F., Pitney, B. H., & Rohrbach, L. A. (2003). Smoking behavior among urban and rural Native American adolescentsin California. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25, 251-255.
82.
Unnever, J. D., Cullen, F. T., & Pratt, T. C. (2003). Parental management, ADHD, and delinquent involvement: Reassessing Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory. Justice Quarterly, 20, 471-500.
83.
U.S. Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs. (1985). Indianjuvenile alcoholism and eligibility for BIA schools (Senatehearing99-286).Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
84.
Vazsonyi, A. T. (2003). Cross-national comparative research in criminology: Content of simply methodology? In C. L. Britt & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 179-211). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
85.
Vazsonyi, A. T., & Crosswhite, J. M. (2004). A test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime in African American adolescents. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 41, 407-432.
86.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Pickering, L. E., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. (2001).An empirical test of a general theory of crime: A four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 91-131.
87.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Wittekind, J. E., Belliston, L. M., & Van Loh, T. D. (2004). Extending the general theory of crime to “the East”: Low self-control in Japanese late adolescents. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 189-216.
88.
Wakeling, S., Jorgensen, M., Michaelson, S., & Begay, M. (2001). Policing on American Indian reservations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
89.
Willeto, A. A. (1999).Navajo cultureand family influenceson academic success: Traditionalism is not a significant predictor of achievement among young Navajos. Journal of American Indian Education, 38, 1-21.
90.
Winfree, L. T., & Bernat, F. P. (1998).Social learning, self-control, and substance abuse by eighth grade students: A tale of two cities. Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 539-558.
91.
Wood, P. B., & Clay, C. W. (1996). Perceived structural barriers and academic performance among American Indian high school students. Youth and Society, 28, 40-60.
92.
Wood, P. B., Pfefferbaum, B., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Risk-taking and self-control: Social psychological correlates of delinquency. Journal of Crime and Justice, 26, 111-130.
93.
Wright, B. R. E., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1999). Low self-control, social bonds, and crime: Social causation, social selection, or both?Criminology, 37, 479-514.
94.
Young, T. J. (1988). Substance use and abuse among Native Americans. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 125-138.
95.
Young, T. J. (1990). Native American crime and criminal justice require criminologists' attention. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 1, 111-116.
