Akers, R. L., & Jensen, G. F. (2003). Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: A guide for the new century. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
2.
Andrews, D. A. (2001). Principles of effective correctional programs. In L. L. Motiuk & R. C. Serin (Eds.), Compendium 2000 on effective correctional programming (pp. 9-17). Ottawa: Correctional Services of Canada.
3.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
4.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
5.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
6.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
7.
Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (in press-a). Managing correctional treatment for reduced recidivism: A meta-analytic review of program integrity. Legal and Criminological Psychology.
8.
Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (in press-b). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.
9.
Andrews, D. A., Dowden, C., & Rettinger, J. L. (2001). Special populations within corrections. In J. A. Winterdyk (Ed.), Corrections in Canada: Social reactions to crime (pp. 170-212). Toronto, Canada: Prentice Hall.
10.
Andrews, D. A., & Robinson, D. (1984). The Level of Supervision Inventory: Second report [Report to Research Services]. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
11.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
12.
Baird, S. C., Heinz, R. C., & Bemus, B. J. (1979). Project report #14: A two year follow-up. Madison, WI: Department of Health and Social Services, Case Classification/Staff Deployment Project, Bureau of Community Corrections.
13.
Barnoski, R., & Aos, S. (2003). Washington’s Offender Accountability Act: An analysis of the Department of Corrections’ risk assessment. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
14.
Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2005). Criminal behavior: A psychosocial approach (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
15.
Blackburn, R. (1993). The psychology of criminal conduct: Theory, research and practice. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
16.
Bonta, J. (1996). Risk-needs assessment and treatment. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 18-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Bonta, J. (2002). Offender risk assessment: Guidelines for selection and use. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 355-379.
18.
Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, R. K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 123-142.
19.
Brown, S. L. (2003). The dynamic prediction of criminal recidivism: A three-wave prospective study 1995-2002. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
20.
Clements, C. B. (1996). Offender classification: Two decades of progress. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 121-143.
21.
Copas, J., & Marshall, P. (1998). The Offender Group Reconviction Scale: The statistical reconviction score for use by probation officers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C, 47, 159-171.
22.
Covington, S. S., & Bloom, B. (1999, September). Gender-responsive programming and evaluation for women in the criminal justice system: A shift from what works? To what is the work? Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Toronto, Canada.
23.
DiClemente, C. C., & Velasquez, M. M. (2002). Motivational interviewing and the stages of change. In W. R. Miller & S. Rollnick (Eds.), Motivational interviewing (2nd ed., pp. 201-216). New York: Guilford.
24.
Dieterich, W. (2003). Long term recidivism using follow-up data. Traverse City, MI: Northpointe Institute for Public Management.
25.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practices in delivering effective correctional treatment: A meta-analysis of core correctional practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203-214.
26.
Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (2001). The Correctional Program Assessment Inventory 2000 (CPAI 2000). Saint John, Canada: University of New Brunswick.
27.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offender risk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 397-426.
28.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575-607.
29.
Girard, L., & Wormith, J. (2004). The predictive validity of the Level of Service Inventory-Ontario Revision on general and violent recidivism among various offender groups. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 150-181.
30.
Gray, N. S., Taylor, J., Snowden, R. J., MacCulloch, S., Phillips, H., & MacCulloch, M. J. (2004). Relative efficacy of criminological, clinical, and personality measures of future risk of offending in mentally disordered offenders: A comparative study of HCR-20, PCL: SV, and OGRS. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 523-531.
31.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30.
32.
Hannah-Moffat, K., & Shaw, M. (2001). Taking risks: Incorporating gender and culture into the classification and assessment of federally sentenced women in Canada [Policy research Report]. Ottawa: Status of Women in Canada.
33.
Hanson, R. K., & Bussière, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-363.
34.
Hanson, R. K., & Harris, A. J. R. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.
35.
Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2004). Predictors of sexual recidivism: An updated meta-analysis (User report 2004-02). Ottawa: Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Canada.
36.
Hare, R. D. (1990). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
37.
Hemphill, J. F., & Hare, R. D. (2004). Some misconceptions about the PCL-R and risk assessment: A reply to Gendreau, Goggin, and Smith. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 203-243.
38.
HM Prison Service and National Probation Directorate. (2001). The Offender Assessment System: User manual. London: Home Office.
39.
Hoffman, P. B. (1994). Twenty years of operational use of a risk prediction instrument: The United States Parole Commission’s Salient Factor Score. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22, 477-494.
40.
Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2002). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
41.
Hollin, C. R. (2002). Risk-needs assessment and allocation to offender programmes. In J. McGuire (Ed.). Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending (pp. 309-332). Etobicoke, Canada: John Wiley.
42.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., & Morash, M. (2004). Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology and Public Policy, 3, 185-209.
43.
Jesness, C. F. (1988). The Jesness Inventory classification system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 78-91.
44.
Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28, 471-489.
45.
Law, M. (2004). A longitudinal follow-up of federally sentenced women in the community: Assessing the predictive validity of the dynamic characteristics of the Community Intervention Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
46.
Lerner, K., Arling, G., & Baird, S. C. (1986). Client management classification strategies for case supervision. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 254-272.
47.
Link, B. G., Andrews, H., & Cullen, F. T. (1992). The violent and illegal behavior of mental patients reconsidered. American Sociological Review, 57, 275-292.
48.
Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and early adulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
Lowenkamp, C. T. (2004). Correctional program integrity and treatment effectiveness: A multi-site, program-level analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
50.
Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2002). Evaluation of Ohio’s community based correctional facilities and halfway house programs [Technical report]. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
51.
Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2004). Empirical evidence on the importance of training and experience in using the Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Retrieved from, http://www.nicic.org/Misc/URLShell.aspx?SRC=Catalog&REFF=http://nicic.org/Library/period274&ID=period274&TYPE=PDF&URL=http://www.nicic.org/pubs/2004/period274.pdf
52.
Loza, W., & Green, K. (2003). The Self-Appraisal Questionnaire. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 781-798.
53.
Maruna, S., Lebel, T. P., Mitchell, N., & Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 271-182.
54.
McGuire, J. (2004). Understanding psychology and crime: Perspectives on theory and action. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
55.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). Structural models of personality and their relation to antisocial behavior: A meta-analytic review. Criminology, 29(4), 765-798.
56.
Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81(2), 168-178.
57.
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing (2nded.). New York: Guilford.
58.
Motiuk, L. L. (1997). Classification for correctional programming: The Offender Intake Assessment (OIA) process. Forum on Corrections Research, 9, 18-22.
59.
Motiuk, L. L., Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (1990). Dynamic predictive criterion validity in offender assessment. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Annual Convention, Ottawa.
60.
Nesovic, A. (2003). Psychometric evaluation of the Correctional Program Assessment Inventory (CPAI). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
61.
Northpointe Institute for Public Management. (1996). COMPAS [Computer software]. Traverse City, MI: Author.
62.
Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
63.
Quinsey, V. L., Coleman, G., Jones, B., & Altrows, I. F. (1997). Proximal antecedents of eloping and reoffending among supervised mentally disordered offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 794-813.
64.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
Raynor, P., Kynch, J., Roberts, C., & Merrington, S. (2000). Risk and need assessment in probation services: An evaluation (HomeOffice Research StudyNo.211). London: HomeOffice.
66.
Rettinger, L. J. (1998). A recidivism follow-up study investigating risk and need within a sample of provincially sentenced women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.
67.
Rigakos, G. S. (1999). Risk society and actuarial criminology: Prospects for a critical discourse. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 41, 137-151.
68.
Simourd, D. J., & Hoge, R. D. (2000). Criminal psychopathy: A risk-and-need perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 256-272.
69.
Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D. P., & Wikström, P.-O. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 111-124.
70.
Swanson, J. W., Borum, R., Swartz, M. S., & Monahan, J. (1996). Psychotic symptoms and the risk of violent behavior in the community. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 6, 309-329.
71.
van Voorhis, P. (1994). Psychological classification of the adult male prison inmate. Albany: State University of New York Press.
72.
Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10, 243-257.
73.
Ward, T., & Stewart, C. (2003). Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 9, 125-143.
74.
Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). The HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (Version 2). Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
75.
Webster, C. D., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Cormier, C., & Quinsey, V. L. (1994). The violence prediction scheme: Assessing dangerousness in high risk men. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Centre of Criminology.
76.
Wong, S., & Hare, R. D. (2005). Guidelines for a psychopathy treatment program. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
77.
Zamble, E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). The criminal recidivism process. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78.
Zinger, I. (2004). Actuarial risk assessment and human rights: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 46, 607-621.