Risk assessments generally rely on actuarial measures of criminal history. However, these static measures do not address changes in risk as a result of intervention. To this end, this study examines the basic psychometric properties of the TCU Criminal Thinking Scales (TCU CTS), a brief (self-rating) instrument developed to assess cognitive functioning expected to be related to criminal conduct. Findings demonstrate that these scales have good psychometric properties and can serve as a short but reliable self-reported criminal thinking assessment. Their applications as part of an assessment system to determine offender progress and effectiveness are discussed.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). LSI-R: The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
2.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17(1), 19-52.
4.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
5.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
7.
Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Broome, K. M., Hiller, M. L., & Simpson, D. D. (2000, March). During-treatment changes in psychosocial functioning for probationers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (ACJS), New Orleans, LA.
9.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 629-637.
12.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
13.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000, October). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(4), 449-467.
14.
Fletcher, B. W. (2003). The National Criminal Justice Drug Abuse Treatment Studies (CJ DATS). Offender Substance Abuse Report, 3(5), 1-5.
15.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Smith, P. (2002). Is the PCL-R really the “unparalleled” measure of offenderrisk? A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 397-426.
16.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C. E., & Law, M. A. (1997). Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(4), 414-431.
17.
Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34(4), 575-607.
18.
Harris, M. K. (2005). In search of common ground: The importance of theoretical orientations in criminology and criminal justice. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 311-328.
19.
Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary, NC: SAS.
20.
Hiller, M. L., Knight, K., & Simpson, D. D. (1999). Risk factors that predict dropout from corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. The Prison Journal, 79(4), 411-430.
21.
Joe, G. W., Broome, K. M., Rowan-Szal, G. A., & Simpson, D. D. (2002). Measuring patient attributes and engagement in treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22(4), 183-196.
22.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
23.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.
24.
Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. The Prison Journal, 79(3), 337-351.
25.
Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. L. (2002). Screening and referral for substance-abuse treatment in the criminal justice system. In C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims, & D. Farabee (Eds.), Treatment of drug offenders: Policies and issues (pp. 259-272). New York: Springer.
26.
Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Morey, J. T. (2002). TCU-NIC Cooperative Agreement: Final report. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University, Institute of Behavioral Research.
27.
Latessa, E. J. (2003-2004). Best practices of classification and assessment. Journal of Community Corrections, 13(2), 4-6, 27-29.
28.
Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Increasing the effectiveness of correctional programming through the risk principle: Identifying offenders for residential placement. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 263-290.
29.
National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse. (1998). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America’s prison population. New York: Author.
30.
SAS Institute. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 user’s guide. Cary, NC: Author.
31.
Simourd, D. J. (1997). The Criminal Sentiments Scale—Modified and Pride in Delinquency Scale: Psychometric properties and construct validity of two measures of criminal attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 52-70.
32.
Simourd, D. J., & Olver, M. E. (2002). The future of criminal attitudes research and practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(4), 427-446.
33.
Simpson, D. D., & Joe, G. W. (2004). A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 27(2), 89-97.
34.
Simpson, D. D., Joe, G. W., & Broome, K. M. (2002). A national 5-year follow-up of treatment outcomes for cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 538-544.
35.
Simpson, D. D., Knight, K., & Dansereau, D. F. (2004). Addiction treatment strategies for offenders. Journal of Community Corrections, 13(4), 7-10, 27-32.
36.
Taxman, F. S., Thanner, M., & Weisburd, D. (2005). Risk, need, and responsivity (RNR): It all depends. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 28-51.
37.
Walters, G. D. (1995a). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles, Part I: Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(3), 307-325.
38.
Walters, G. D. (1995b). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles, Part II: Identifying simulated response sets. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(4), 437-445.
39.
Walters, G. D. (1996). The natural history of substance misuse in an incarcerated criminal population. Journal of Drug Issues, 26(4), 943-959.
40.
Walters, G. D. (1998). Changing lives of crime and drugs: Intervening with substance-abusing offenders. New York: John Wiley.
41.
Walters, G. D. (2002). Developmental trajectories, transitions, and nonlinear dynamical systems: A model of crime deceleration and desistance. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(1), 30-44.
42.
Walters, G. D. (2003). Changes in criminal thinking and identity in novice and experienced inmates: Prisonization revisited. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 399-421.
43.
Walters, G. D., & Geyer, M. O. (2005). Construct validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles in relationships to the PAI, disciplinary adjustment, and program completion. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(3), 252-260.
44.
Wexler, H. K., & Melnick, J. (2004). Risk and prison substance abuse treatment outcomes: A replication and challenge. The Prison Journal, 84(1), 106-120.
45.
Yochelson, S., & Samenow, S. E. (1976). The criminal personality volume I: A profile for change. New York: Jason Aronson.
