The central tenet of Gottfredson and Hirschi's self-control theory is that antisocial behavior is caused by stable between-individual differences in self-control. They also argue that after early childhood, interventions aimed at reducing antisocial behavior will be unsuccessful, as one's level of self-control is resilient to such efforts. This research tested the stability and resiliency hypotheses using a two-wave panel design in a sample of incarcerated offenders. The results indicated that self-control was not stable during a short period of time but that self-control was resilient to participation in a treatmentoriented boot-camp program.
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-136. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990).Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-397.
3.
Arneklev, B. J., Cochran, J. K., & Gainey, R. R. (1998). Testing Gottfredson and Hirschi's “low self-control” stability hypothesis: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(1), 107-127.
4.
Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., & Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225-247.
5.
Blumstein, A., Farrington, D. P., & Moitra, S. D. (1985). Delinquency careers: Innocents, desisters, and persisters. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and Justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 6, pp. 187-220). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Burton, V. S., Jr., Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Olivares, K. M., & Dunaway, R. G. (1999).Age, self-control, and adults'offending behaviors: A research note assessing a general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(1), 45-54.
7.
DeLisi, M., Hochstetler, A., & Murphy, D. S. (2003). Self-control behind bars: A validation study of the Grasmick et al. scale. Justice Quarterly, 20, 241-264.
8.
Evans, T. D., Cullen, F. T., Burton, V. S., Jr., Dunaway, R. G., & Benson, M. L. (1997). The social consequencesofself-control:Testingthegeneraltheoryofcrime. Criminology, 35, 475-504.
9.
Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., & Cullen, F. T. (1999). The effects of prison sentences on recidivism. Canada: Department of the Solicitor General.
10.
Gibbs, J. J., Giever, D., & Martin, J. S. (1998).Parental managementand self-control:An empirical test of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(1), 40-70.
11.
Gibson, C. L., & Wright, J. (2001). Low self-control and co-worker delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 483-492.
12.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (2003). Self-control and opportunity. In C. L. Britt & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency Vol. 12: Advances in criminological theory (pp. 5-19). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
14.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5-29.
15.
Hay, C. (2001). Parenting, self-control and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology, 39, 707-736.
16.
Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. G. (2001). Self-control theory. In R. Paternoster & R. Bachman (Eds.), Explaining criminals and crime (pp. 81-96). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
17.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, et al. (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
18.
Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J. A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
19.
MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Reducing the criminal activities of known offenders and delinquents: Crime prevention in the courts and corrections. In L. W. Sherman, D. P. Farrington, B. C. Welsh, & D. L. MacKenzie (Eds.), Evidence-based crime prevention (pp. 330-404). New York: Routledge.
20.
MacKenzie, D. L., Wilson, D. B., & Kider, S. B. (2001). Effects of correctional boot camps on offending. Annalsof the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 578, 126-143.
21.
Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. (2002). Herman H. Toulson Boot Camp Program description. Retrieved October 16, 2004, from http://www.dpscs.state.md.us/dpp/boot/tbc_desc.shtml
22.
Mitchell, O., MacKenzie, D. L., & Perez, D. (2005). A randomized evaluation of the Maryland correctional boot camp for adults: Effects on offender anti-social attitudes and cognitions. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 71-86.
23.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1991).On the relationship of past to future participation in delinquency. Criminology, 29, 163-189.
24.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review, 27, 467-496.
25.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(2), 117-144.
26.
Paternoster, R., & Brame, R. (1998). The structural similarity of processes generating criminal and analogous behaviors. Criminology, 36, 633-669.
27.
Perrone, D., Sullivan, C., Pratt, T. C., & Margaryan, S. (2004).Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: A test of a general theory of crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 298-312.
28.
Piquero, A. R., & Rosay, A. B. (1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.'s self-control scales: A comment on Longshore et al.Criminology, 36(1), 157-174.
29.
Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38, 931-964.
30.
Pratt, T. C., Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2004). Parental socialization and community context: A longitudinalanalysis of the structural sources of low self-control. Journalof Research in Crime & Delinquency, 41, 219-243.
31.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.
32.
Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall.
34.
Sellers, C. S. (1999). Self-control and intimate violence: An examination of the scope and specification of the general theory of crime. Criminology, 37, 375-404.
35.
Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., Nagin, D., Pagani, L., & Séquin, J. R. (2003). The Montreal Longitudinal and Experimental Study. In T. P. Thornberry & M. D. Krohn (Eds.), Taking stock of delinquency: An overview of findings from contemporary longitudinalstudies (pp. 205-254). New York: Klewer Academic/Plenum.
37.
Turner, M. G., & Piquero, A. R. (2002). The stability of self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 457-471.
38.
Turner, M. G., Piquero, A., & Pratt, T. C. (in press). The schoolcontext as a sourceof self-control. Journal of Criminal Justice.
39.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Pickering, L. E., Junger, M., & Hessing, D. (2001).An empirical test of a general theory of crime: A four-nation comparative study of self-control and the prediction of deviance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 91-131.
40.
Wolfgang, M. E., Figlio, R. M., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a birth cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
