This study is a quantitative analysis designed to compare two groups of factually innocent capital defendants: those who were exonerated and those who were executed. There are a total of 97 cases in the sample, including 81 exonerations and 16 executions. The primary objective of the authors is to identify factors that may predict case outcomes among capital defendants with strong claims of factual innocence. Through the use of a logistic regression model, the following variables were significant predictors of case outcome (exoneration vs. execution): allegations of perjury, multiple types of evidence, prior felony record, type of attorney at trial, and race of the defendant. These results point toward significant problems with the administration of capital punishment deriving primarily from the quality of the case record created at trial.
Adams, R., Hoffer, W., & Hoffer, M. (1991). Adams v. Texas. New York: St. Martin’s.
2.
Amnesty International. (1998). Fatal flaws: Innocence and the death penalty in the USA. New York: Author.
3.
Armbrust, S. (2002). Chance and the exoneration of Anthony Porter. In D. Dow & M. Dow (Eds.), The Machinery of death (pp. 157-166). New York: Routledge.
4.
Baldus, D., & Woodworth, G. (1998). Race discrimination and the death penalty: An empirical and legal overview. In J. Acker, R. Bohm, & C. Lanier (Eds.), America’s experiment with capital punishment (pp. 385-415). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
5.
Baldus, D., Woodworth, G., & Pulaski, C., Jr. (1990). Equal justice and the death penalty: A legal and empirical analysis. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
6.
Bandes, S. (1996). Simple murder: A comment on the legality of executing the innocent. Buffalo Law Review, 44, 501-525.
7.
Bedau, H., & Radelet, M. (1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases. Stanford Law Review, 40, 21-179.
8.
Bedau, H., & Radelet, M. (1988). The myth of infallibility: A reply to Markman and Cassell. Stanford Law Review, 41, 161-170.
9.
Berlow, A. (2000). The hanging governor. RetrievedMay11,2000, from http://www.salon.com
10.
Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
11.
Brandon, R., & Davies, C. (1973). Wrongful imprisonment: Mistaken convictions and their consequences. London: Allen and Unwin.
12.
Bright, S. (1992). In defense of life: Enforcing the Bill of Rights on behalf of the poor, minority and disadvantaged persons facing the death penalty. Missouri Law Review, 57, 849-870.
13.
Bright, S. (1994). Counsel for the poor: The death sentence not for the worst crime but for the worst lawyer. Yale Law Journal, 103, 1835-1883.
14.
Burnett, C. (2002). Justice denied: Clemency appeals in death penalty cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
15.
Burtman, B. (2002). Innocence lost. In D. Dow & M. Dow (Eds.), The machinery of death. New York: Routledge.
16.
Castelle, G., & Loftus, E. (2001). Misinformation and wrongful convictions. In S. Westervelt & J. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 17-35). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17.
Clarke, A., Lambert, E., & Whitt, L. (2001). Executing the innocent: The next step in the Marshall Hypothesis. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 26, 309-345.
18.
Cohen, S. (2003). The wrong man: America’s epidemic of wrongful death row convictions. New York: Carroll & Graf.
19.
Davies, N. (1993). White lies: Rape, murder, and justice Texas style. New York: Avon.
20.
Death Penalty Information Center. (1997). Innocence and the death penalty: The increasing danger of executing the innocent. Washington, DC: Author.
21.
Drizin, S., & Leo, R. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891-1005.
22.
Earley, P. (1995). Circumstantial evidence: Death, life, and justice in a southern town. New York: Bantam.
23.
Edds, M. (2003). An expendable man. New York: New York University Press.
24.
Farrell, J. (2000, August 27). Cry of ‘Innocent!’ trumps moral claim. Boston Globe, p. F1.
25.
Findley, K. (2002). Learning from our mistakes: A criminal justice commission to study wrongful convictions. California Western Law Review, 38, 333-353.
26.
Frank, J., & Frank, B. (1957). Not guilty. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
27.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
28.
Gilvelber, D. (1997). Meaningless acquittals, meaningful convictions: Do we reliably acquit the innocent?Rutgers Law Review, 49, 1317-1396.
29.
Grassroots Investigative Project. (2000). Reasonable doubts: Is the U.S. executing innocent people?Hyattsville, MD: Quixote Center.
30.
Gray, M. (2003). The death game: Capital punishment and the luck of the draw. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
31.
Gross, S. (1996). The risks of death: Why erroneous convictions are common in capital cases. Buffalo Law Review, 44, 469-500.
32.
Gross, S. (1998). Lost lives: Miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61, 125-152.
33.
Gross, S., Jacoby, K., Matheson, D., Montgomery, N., & Patil, S. (2004). Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Society Institute.
34.
Gross, S., & Mauro, R. (1987). Death and discrimination: Racial disparities in capital sentencing. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
35.
Harmon, T. (2001). Predictors of miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Justice Quarterly, 18, 949-968.
36.
Harmon, T. (2004). Race for your life: An analysis of the role of race in erroneous capital convictions. Criminal Justice Review, 29, 76-96.
37.
Hosmer, D., & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.
38.
Huff, R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1996). Convicted but innocent. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Ingle, J. (1990). Last rights. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
40.
Jackson, J., & Burke, W. (1999). Dead run: The untold story of Dennis Stockton and America’s only mass escape from death row. New York: Times Books.
41.
Kirchmeier, J. (2002). Another place beyond here: The death penalty moratorium movement in the United States. Colorado Law Review, 73, 1-116.
42.
Lee, M., & Ermann, D. (1999). Pinto ‘madness’ as a flawed landmark narrative: An organizational and network analysis. Social Problems, 46, 30-47.
43.
Leo, R. (2001). False confessions: Causes, consequences, and solutions. In S. Westervelt & J. Humphrey (Eds.). Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 36-54). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
44.
Leo, R., & Ofshe, R. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429-496.
45.
Liebman, J. (2002). Rates of reversible error and the risk of wrongful execution. Judicature, 86, 78-82.
46.
Liebman, J., Fagan, J., & West, V. (2000). A broken system: Error rates in capital cases. New York: Justice Project.
47.
Lofquist, W. (2001). Whodunit? An examination of the production of wrongful convictions. In S. Westervelt & J. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 174-196). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
48.
Lofquist, W., & Harmon, T. (2005). Fatal errors: Compelling claims of executions of the innocent in the post-Furman era. Manuscript submitted for publication.
49.
Loftus, E. (1996). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
Loftus, E. (2003). Make believe memories. American Psychologist, 58, 867-873.
51.
Markman, S., & Cassell, P. (1988). Protecting the innocent: A response to the Bedau-Radelet study. Stanford Law Review, 41, 121-160.
52.
Mello, M. (2001). The wrong man: A true story of innocence on death row. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
National Center for State Courts Error in Criminal Appeals. (1989). Three papers on understanding reversible appeals. Williamsburg, VA: State Justice Institute.
55.
Parker, K., Dewees, M., & Radelet, M. (2001). Racial bias and the conviction of the innocent. In S. Westervelt & J. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 114-131). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
56.
Parloff, R. (1996). Triple jeopardy. Boston: Little, Brown.
57.
Radelet, M., & Bedau, H. (1998). The execution of the innocent. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61, 105-124.
58.
Radelet, M., Bedau, H., & Putnam, C. (1992). In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
59.
Radelet, M., Lofquist, W., & Bedau, H. (1996). Prisoners released from death row since 1970 because of doubts about their guilt. Cooley Law Review, 13, 907-966.
60.
Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293.
61.
Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.
62.
Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights, Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. (1993). Innocence and the death penalty: Assessing the danger of mistaken executions. Washington, DC: Author.
63.
Tucker, J. (1997). May God have mercy: A true story of crime and punishment. New York: Norton.
64.
Vaughan, D. (1996). The Challenger launch decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65.
Warden, R., & Protess, D. (1998). A promise of justice: The eighteen year fight to save four innocent men. New York: Hyperion.
66.
Welch, M., & Burr, R. (2002). The politics of finality and the execution of the innocent: The case of Gary Graham. In D. Dow & M. Dow (Eds.), The machinery of death (pp. 127-143). New York: Routledge.
67.
Wilgoren, J. (2003, January12). Citing issue of fairness, governor clears out death row in Illinois. New York Times, p. 1
68.
Willing, R. (2001, May 4). Even for death penalty foes, McVeigh is the exception: Worst mass murderer in U.S. history tilts debate over capital punishment. USA Today, p. A01
69.
Wiseman, C. (1996). Representing the condemned: A critique of capital punishment. Marquette Law Review, 79, 731-758.
70.
Yant, M. (1991). Presumed guilty: When innocent people are wrongly convicted. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
71.
Zimmerman, C. (2001). From the jailhouse to the courthouse: The role of informants in wrongful convictions. In S. Westervelt & J. Humphrey (Eds.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 55-76). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
