In recent years, the growing number of minority youth disproportionately confined in secure detention facilities has led to a search for a better understanding of this occurrence. Explanations vary but tend to center on either differential offending or selection bias. The present study examines the extent both may explain decision making by specifically assessing the effect of race on detention and the degree that race and detention influence further court processing in one juvenile court jurisdiction in the state of Iowa. Multivariate analyses using juvenile court data (1980 through 2000) show that although legal factors account for some of the decision making and minority over representation, so too does race. Evidence is presented that, through detention, race has direct, interaction, and indirect effects that often work to the disadvantage of African American youth relative to White youth. Implications for future research and policy are discussed.
Agresti, A. (1989). Tutorial on modeling ordered categorical response data. Psychologist Bulletin, 105, 290-301.
2.
Belsley, D., Kuhn, E., & Welsh, R. (1980). Regression diagnostics identifying influential data and source of collinearity. New York: John Wiley.
3.
Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386-398.
4.
Bishop, D. (in press). The role of race and ethnicity in juvenile justice processing. In D. Hawkins & K. Kempf-Leonard (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Bishop, D., & Frazier, C. (1988). The influence of race in juvenile justice processing. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22, 309-328.
6.
Bortner, M., & Reed, W. (1985). Race and the impact of juvenile deinstitutionalization. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 35-46.
7.
Bridges, G., Hsia, H., & McHale, R. (2004). Disproportionate confinement—2002 update. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
8.
Bridges, G., & Steen, S. (1998). Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 63, 554-570.
9.
Bureau of the Census. (2000). 2000 census of population: General population characteristics. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Chambliss, W. (1995). Crime control and ethnic minorities: Legitimizing racial oppression by creating moral panics. In D. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and place (pp 235-258). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
11.
DeJong, C., & Jackson, K. (1998). Putting race into context: Race, juvenile justice processing, and urbanization. Justice Quarterly, 15, 487-504.
12.
Division of Criminal and Juvenile Planning and Statistical Analysis. (2004). Youth development approach for Iowa’s children and families. Des Moines, IA: Author.
13.
Eby, C. (2001, February 25). Black Hawk sentences among the state’s toughest. Waterloo Courier, pp. A1, A7.
14.
Engen, R., Steen, S., & Bridges, G. (2002). Racial disparities in the punishment of youth: A theoretical and empirical assessment of the literature. Social Problems, 49, 194-220.
15.
Feld, B. (1988). In Re Gault revisted: A cross-state comparison of the right to counsel in juvenile court. Crime & Delinquency, 34, 393-424.
16.
Feld, B. (1999). Bad kids: Race and the transformation of the juvenile court. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Feyerherm, W. (2000). Detention reform and over-representation: A successful snynergy. Corrections Management Quarterly, 4(1): 44-51.
18.
Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 76, 1132-1152.
19.
Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. M. (1995). Reflections on race effects in juvenile justice. In K. Kempf-Leonard, C. E. Pope, & W. Feyerherm (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 16-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Frazier, C., & Cochran, J. (1986). Detention of juveniles its effects on subsequent juvenile court proceedings. Youth and Society, 17, 286-305.
21.
A generation in prison editorial. (2000, December 30). Des Moines Register, p. 19.
22.
Guevara, L., Spohn, C., & Herz, D. (2004). Race, legal representation, and juvenile justice: Issues and concerns. Crime & Delinquency, 50, 344-371.
23.
Hawkins, D., & Kempf-Leonard, K. (Eds.). (in press). Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Heckman, J. (1974). Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica, 42, 679-694.
25.
Henretta, J., Frazier, C., & Bishop, D. (1986). The effect of prior case outcomes on juvenile justice decision making. Social Forces, 65, 555-562.
26.
Hindelang, M. (1978). Race and involvement in common law personal crimes. American Sociological Review, 43, 93-109.
27.
Hsia, H., Bridges, G., & McHale, R. (2004). Disproportionate confinement—2002 update. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
28.
Hsia, H., & Hamparian, D. (1998). Disproportionate minority confinement: 1997 update. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
29.
Hoytt, E., Schiraldi, V., Smith, B., & Ziedenberg, J. (2002). Reducing racial disparities in juvenile detention: Pathways to juvenile detention reform. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
30.
Justice Policy Institute. (2002). Reducing disproportionate minority confinement: The Multnomah County, Oregon success story and its implications. Washington, DC: Justice Policy Institute.
31.
Kempf-Leonard, K., & Sontheimer, H. (1995). The role of race in juvenile justice in Pennsylvania. In K. Kempf-Leonard, C. E. Pope, & W. Feyerherm (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 98-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
Leiber, M. (1994). A comparison of juvenile court outcomes for Native Americans, African Americans, and Whites. Justice Quarterly, 11, 257-279.
33.
Leiber, M. (2002). Disproportionate minority youth confinement (DMC): An analysis of the mandate and state responses. Crime & Delinquency, 48(1), 3-45.
34.
Leiber, M. (2003). The contexts of juvenile justice decision making: When race matters. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
35.
Leiber, M., and Jamieson, K. (1995). Race, decision making and the implications of context in juvenile justice proceedings. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11(4), 363-388.
36.
Leiber, M., & Mack, K. (2003). The individual and joint effects of race, gender, and family status on juvenile justice decision-making. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 40(1), 34-70.
37.
Leiber, M., & Stairs, J. (1999). Race, contexts, and the use of intake diversion. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36, 56-86.
38.
McCarthy, B., & Smith, B. (1986). The conceptualization of discrimination in the juvenile justice process: The impact of administrative factors and screening decisions of juvenile court decisions. Criminology, 24, 41-64.
39.
Mihalic, S., Irwin, K., Fagan, A., Ballard, D., & Elliott, D. (2004). Successful program implementation: Lessons from blueprints. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
40.
North East Iowa Juvenile Detention Center. (2004). Annual report. Black Hawk County, IA: Author.
41.
Peterson, T. (1985). A comment on presenting results from logit and probit models. American Sociological Review, 50, 130-131.
42.
Pope, C. E. (1995). Equity within the juvenile justice system: Directions for the future. In K. Kempf-Leonard, C. E. Pope, & W. Feyerherm (Eds.), Minorities in juvenile justice (pp. 201-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Pope, C. E., & Feyerherm, W. (1992). Minorities and the juvenile justice system: Full report. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Juvenile Justice Clearing House.
44.
Pope, C. E., & Leiber, M. (in press). Disproportionate minority contact (DMC): The federal initiative. In D. Hawkins & K. Kempf-Leonard (Eds.), Our children, their children: Confronting racial and ethnic differences in American juvenile justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45.
Pope, C. E., Lovell, R., & Hsia, H. M. (2002). Synthesis of disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) research literature (1989-1999). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
46.
Quinney, R. (1970). The social reality of crime. Boston: Little, Brown.
47.
Sampson, R., & Laub, J. (1993). Structural variations in juvenile court processings: Inequality, the underclass, and social control. Law & Society Review, 27, 285-311.
48.
Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: A national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
49.
Stahl, A. (1999). Delinquency cases waived to criminal court, 1987-1996 (Fact Sheet No. 99). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
50.
Steinhart, D. (2001). Special detention cases: Strategies for handling difficult populations pathways to juvenile detention reform. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation.
51.
Thornberry, T., & Christenson, R. L. (1984). Juvenile justice decision making as a longitudinal process. Social Forces, 63, 433-444.
52.
Tittle, C., & Curran, D. (1988). Contingencies for dispositional disparities in juvenile justice. Social Forces, 67, 23-58.
53.
Tracy, P. E. (2002). Decision making and juvenile justice: An analysis of bias in case processing. Westport, CT: Praeger.
54.
U.S. Department Of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2000). Disproportionate minority confinement technical assistance manual. Washington, DC: Author.
55.
Weber, M. (1969). Max Weber on law in economy and society (M. Rheinstein, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
Wordes, M., Bynum, T., & Corley, C. (1994). Locking up youth: The impact of race on detention decisions. Journal of Crime & Delinquency, 31(2), 149-165.
57.
Zatz, M. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 24, 69-92.
