The Imposition and Effects of Restitution in Four Pennsylvania Counties: Effects of Size of County and Specialized Collection Units

Abstract

This study examined court records, probation records, and collection office records in four counties in Pennsylvania, which were chosen because they varied along two dimensions: (a) population size and (b) the use of specialized units for the collection of monetary sanctions. From each county, restitution-eligible cases were sampled from both 1994 and 1996 to test the effect of a 1995 statutory change mandating restitution. Multivariate models indicated that restitution was significantly more likely to be ordered for property crimes, for offenses that were more easily quantified, for offenses against businesses, and for offenses after the statutory change. Moreover, restitution was more likely to be imposed and a higher percentage was likely to be paid in counties with smaller populations and in counties in which probation officers handled the collection of economic sanctions than in counties in which they were handled by specialized collection units.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blair County Commissioners. (1997, July). Report to the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency: Blair County revised intermediate punishment plan. Hollidaysburg, PA: Blair County.

Braithewaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Cohen, R. (1995). Probation and parole violation in state prison, 1991. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Crimes Code of 1995. 18 Penn. C. S. A. § 1106 (West Supp. 2002).

Foster, E. M. (1997). Instrumental variables for logistic regression: An illustration. Social Science Research, 26, 487-504.

Lightner, P. L. (1997, July). Erie County intermediate punishment plan: Report of Erie County Adult Probation/Parole Department to the Pennsylvania Commission on Crime and Delinquency. Erie, PA: Erie County.

Lurigio, A. J., & Davis, R. C. (1990). Does a threatening letter increase compliance with restitution orders? A field experiment. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 537-548.

Maiolino, F. W., O’Brien, J., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (1990). Computer-supported restitution programming in county probation. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation (pp. 155-162). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.

North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission. (1994). Victim restitution in North Carolina: Report to the 1994 Session of the General Assembly. Raleigh, NC: Author.

10.

Office for Victims of Crime. (1998). New directions from the field: Victims’ rights and services for the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

11.

Olson, D. E., & Ramker, G. F. (2001). Crime does not pay, but criminals may: Factors influencing the imposition and collection of probation fees. Justice System Journal, 22, 29-46.

12.

Outlaw, M. C., & Ruback, R. B. (1999). Predictors and outcomes of victim restitution orders. Justice Quarterly, 16, 847-869.

13.

President’s Task Force on Victims of Crime. (1982). Final report. Washington, DC: Author.

14.

Rowley, M. (1990). Comparison of recidivism rates for delinquents processed in a restitution-diversion program to a matched sample processed in court. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation (pp. 217-226). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.

15.

Ruback, R. B., & Shaffer, J. N. (2002). Restitution in urban and rural counties: Perceived and actual implementation of a mandatory policy. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University.

16.

Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

17.

Shapiro, C. (1990). Is restitution legislation the chameleon of the victims’ movement? In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation (pp. 73-80). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.

18.

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

19.

Smith, B.Davis, R., & Hillenbrand, S. (1989). Improving enforcement of court-ordered restitution. Chicago: American Bar Association.

20.

Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems, 12, 255-276.

21.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Census of population and housing, 1990: Summary Tape File3 on CD-ROM [machine-readable data files]. Washington, DC: Author.

22.

U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). USA Counties 1996 on CD-ROM [machine-readable data files]. Washington, DC: Author.

23.

Van Ness, D. (1990). Restorative justice. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Criminal justice, restitution, and reconciliation (pp. 7-14). Monsey, NY: Willow Tree Press.

24.

Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. (A. M. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

25.

Weisheit, R. A., Wells, L. E., & Falcone, D. N. (1995). Crime and policing in rural and small-town America: An overview of the issues. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.