Although there is a vigorous national debate regarding effective drug policy, such policies are implemented at the local level. Using a national sample of prosecutors, we examine reported typical processing for first-time juvenile marijuana, cocaine, or crack possession/sales offenders. The relationship between drug offense charge and adjudication outcomes providing treatment versus a deterrence/punitive approach is explored. Findings indicate that marijuana offenses and possession offenses generally are more likely to result in access to treatment services for juveniles whereas cocaine/crack offenses and sales offenses generally are more likely to result in the application of punitive penalties such as transfer to criminal court.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aday, L. A.,& Andersen, R. (1981). Equity of access to medical care: A conceptual and empirical overview. Medical Care, 19(Suppl.), 4-27.
2.
Aday, L. A., Begley, C. E., Lairson, D. R.,& Slater, C. H. (1998). Evaluating the healthcare system: Effectiveness, efficiency, and equity(2nd ed.). Chicago: Health Administration Press.
3.
Andersen, R.,& Newman, J. F. (1973). Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51(1), 95-124.
4.
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) Program. (2002). Drug use and related matters among adult arrestees, 2001. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.adam-nij.net/files/adam2001.pdf
5.
Bachman, J. G., Johnston, L. D., & O’Malley, P. M. (2001). The Monitoring the Future Project after 27 years: Design and procedures(Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper No. 54). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
6.
Bartollas, C. (2003). Juvenile delinquency(6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
Flom, P. L., Friedman, S. R., & Kottiri, B. J. (2001). Recalled adolescent peer norms towards drug use in young adulthood in a low-income, minority, urban neighborhood. Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 425-443.
8.
Goode, E. (1997). Between politics and reason: The drug legalization debate. New York: St. MartIn ’s.
9.
Harms, P. (2002, January). Detention in delinquency cases, 1989-1998(OJJDP Fact Sheet #01, FS-200201). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
10.
Holland, J. (2000). Ecstasy, the complete guide: A comprehensive look at the risks and benefits of MDMA. Rochester, VT: Park Street Press.
11.
ImpacTeen Illicit Drug Team. (2002). Illicit drug policies: Selected laws from the 50 states. Berrien Springs, MI: Andrews University. Retrieved October 3, 2003, from http://www.andrews.edu/BHSC/impacteen-illicitdrugteam/
12.
Inciardi, J. A. (2002). Criminal justice(7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2001: Vol. 1. Secondary school students(NIH Publication No. 02-5106). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
15.
Leukefeld, C. G., Logan, T. K., Martin, A. A., Purvis, R. T., & Farabee, D. (1998). A health services use framework for drug-abusing offenders. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(8), 1123-1135.
16.
Mahoney, B., Beaudin, B. D., Carver, J. A., III, Ryan, D. B., & Hoffman, R.B. (2001). Pretrial services programs: Responsibilities and potential(NCJ 181939). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
17.
McBride, D. C., Terry, Y. M.,& Inciardi, J. A. (1999). Alternative perspectives on the drug policy debate. In J. A. Inciardi (Ed.), The drug legalization debate(2nd ed., pp. 9-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
McBride, D. C., Van Buren, H., Terry, Y. M.,& Goldstein, B. J. (2000). Depression, drug use and health services need, utilization and cost. In J. A. Levy (Series Ed.) & J. A. Levy, R. C. Stephens, & D. C. McBride (Vol. Eds.), Advances in medical sociology: Vol. 7. Emergent issues of the field of drug abuse(pp. 67-99). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
19.
McBride, D. C., VanderWaal, C. J., Pacula, R. L., Terry-McElrath, Y., & Chriqui, J. F. (2001). Mandatory minimum sentencing and drug lawviolations: Effects on the criminal justice system. In C. Leukefeld, F. Tims & D. Farabee (Eds.), Treatment of drug offenders: Policies and issues(pp. 319-334). New York: Springer.
20.
McBride, D. C., VanderWaal, C. J., & Terry-McElrath, Y. M. (2003, September). The drugscrime wars: Past, present, and future directions in theory, policy, and program interventions. In H. BrownsteIn & C. Crossland (Eds.), Toward a drugs and crime research agenda for the 21st century(NCJ 194616; pp. 97-162). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
21.
McCoy, H. V., Messiah, S. E., & Zhao, W. (2002). Improving access to primary health care for chronic drug users: An innovative systemic intervention for providers. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 29(4), 445-457.
22.
Mendes, S. M., & McDonald, M. D. (2001). Putting severity of punishment back in the deterrence package. The Policy Studies Journal, 29(4), 588-610.
23.
Office of Justice Programs. (2002, November). Juvenile and family drug court activity by state and county. Retrieved March 27, 2003, from American University, OJP Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project, http://www.american.edu/justice/publications/Juvsumchartgamze.pdf
24.
Pacula, R. L., Chriqui, J. F., Reichmann, D. A., & Terry-McElrath, Y. M. (2002). State medical marijuana laws: Understanding the laws and their limitations. Journal of Public Health Policy, 23(4), 411-437.
25.
Puzzanchera, C. M. (2002, February). Juvenile court placement of adjudicated youth, 1989-1998 (OJJDP Fact Sheet, #02, FS-200202). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
26.
Snyder, H. N. (2001, December). Lawenforcement and juvenile crime. In Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Eds.), Juvenile offenders and victims: National report series bulletIn(NCJ 191031; pp. 1-31). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
27.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Office of Applied Studies. (2001). Treatment episode data set (TEDS): 1994-1999. National admissions to substance treatment services(DASIS Series: S-14, DHHS Publication No. [SMA] 01-3550). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
28.
Szasz, T. (1992). Our right to drugs: The case for a free market. New York: Praeger.
29.
Teplin, L. A., Abram, K. M., McClelland, G. M., Dulcan, M. K., & Mericle, A. A. (2002). Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 1133-1143.
30.
Terry, Y. M., VanderWaal, C. J., McBride, D. C.,& Van Buren, H. (2000). Provision of drug treatment services in the juvenile justice system: A system reform. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 27, 194-214.
31.
Terry-McElrath, Y. M., McBride, D. C., Ruel, E. E., Harwood, E., & VanderWaal, C. J. (2002, August). Social reaction to perceived deviance: Variation in juvenile drug offense adjudication. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American SociologicalAssociation, Chicago.
32.
Thomas, D. W. (2001). National Survey of Chief Juvenile Probation Officers: Integrated substance abuse treatment networks. Draft final report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
33.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Census of population and housing, 2000: Census 2000 summary file 1. DVD-ROM. Washington, D.C.: Author.
VanderWaal, C. J., McBride, D. C., Terry-McElrath, Y. M.,& Van Buren, H. (2001). Breaking the juvenile drug-crime cycle: A guide for practitioners and policymakers(NCJ 186156). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
