This article examines the efficacy and legitimacy of using victim impact statements (VIS) during the penalty phase of capital cases. It is argued that the emotionally laden content of VIS (particularly victim allocution) fuels vengeance, anger, and hatred, thereby undermining prospects for a fair and impartial sentence and undoing prospects for a more meaningful and restorative experience of victim justice. To examine these dynamics, several principles of “critical” restorative justice are delineated, the empirical and legal limits of VIS are identified, society's urge to punish is conceptually and speculatively explored, and this tendency is juxtaposed against the extent to which compassion and forgiveness are important dimensions of the sentencing process. The article concludes with an outline of several policy reforms, consistent with critical restorative justice practice, explaining how personal/family harm following criminal wrongdoing can significantly be attended to for victims, offenders, and the community of which both are a part.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achilles, M., & Zehr, H. (2001). Restorative justice for crime victims: The promise, the challenge. In G. Bazemore & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities (pp. 87-99). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
Arrigo, B. A. (1995). The peripheral core of law and criminology: On postmodern social theory and conceptual integration. Justice Quarterly, 12(3), 447-472.
3.
Arrigo, B. A. (Ed.). (1999). Social justice/criminal justice: The maturation of critical theory in law, crime, and deviance. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4.
Arrigo, B. A. (2000). Social justice and critical criminology: On integrating knowledge. Contemporary Justice Review, 3(1), 7-37.
5.
Arrigo, B. A., & Schehr, R. C. (1998). Restoring justice for juveniles: A critical analysis of victim offender mediation. Justice Quarterly, 15(4), 629-666.
6.
Bandes, S. (1996). Empathy, narrative, and victim impact statements. University of Chicago Law Review, 63, 361-412.
7.
Bandes, S. (2001) (Ed.). The passions of law. New York: NYU Press.
8.
Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2001) (Eds.). Restorative community justice: Repairing harm and transforming communities. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
9.
Bohm, R. M. (1999). Death quest: An introduction to the theory and practice of capital punishment in the United States. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
10.
Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 497 (1987).
11.
Cobb, S. (1997). The domestication of violence in mediation. Law and Society Review, 31(3), 397-440.
12.
Davis, R. C., & Smith, B. E. (1994a). Victim impact statements and victim satisfaction: An unfulfilled promise. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(1), 1-12.
13.
Davis, R. C., & Smith, B. E. (1994b). The effects of victim impact statements on sentencing decisions: A test in an urban setting. Justice Quarterly, 11, 453-469.
14.
Dugger, A. (1996). Victim impact evidence in capital sentencing: A history of incompatibility. American Journal of Criminal Law, 23, 375-403.
15.
Edmund v. Florida, 430 U.S. 362 (1982).
16.
Erez, E., & Roeger, L. (1995). The effect victim impact statements have on sentencing patterns and outcomes: The Australian experience. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(4), 363-375.
17.
Erez, E., Roeger, L., & Morgan, F. (1994). Victim impact statements in South Australia: An evaluation. Adelaide, Australia: Office of Crime Statistics.
18.
Erez, E., & Tontodonato, P. (1992). Victim participation in sentencing and satisfaction with justice. Justice Quarterly, 9, 393-415.
19.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of a prison. New York: Pantheon.
20.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Her.
21.
Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349 (1977).
22.
Giroux, H. (1992). Border pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
23.
Greene, E., Koehring, H., & Quiat, M. (1998). Victim impact evidence in capital cases: Does the victim's character matter? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(2), 145-156.
24.
Held, B. (1995). Back to reality. New York: Norton.
25.
Katz, J. (1988). Seductions of crime. New York: Basic Books.
26.
Kelly, D. (1984). Victims' perceptions of criminal justice. Pepperdine Law review, 11, 15-22.
27.
Kelly, D., & Erez, E. (1997). Victim participation in the criminal justice process. In R. Davis, A. Lurigio, & W. Skogan (Eds.), Victims of crime (pp. 33-54). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Lazarus, R., & Lazarus, B. (1994). Passion and emotion: Making sense of our emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Long, K. (1995). Community input at sentencing: Victim's right or victim's revenge? Boston University Law Review, 75, 187-229.
30.
Luginbuhl, J., & Burkhead, M. (1994). Sources of bias and arbitrariness in the capital trial. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 103-124.
31.
Luginbuhl, J., & Burkhead, M. (1995). Victim impact evidence in a capital trial: Encouraging votes for death. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 1-16.
32.
Martin, C. (1993). The admissibility of victim impact evidence at the sentencing phase of a capital trial. Duquesne Law Review, 31, 801-818.
33.
Milovanovic, D. (1999). Catastrophe theory, discourse, and conflict regulation: Generating a third way. In B. Arrigo (Ed.), Social justice/criminal justice: The maturation of critical theory in law, crime, and deviance (pp. 203-223). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
Myers, B., & Arbuthnot, J. (1999). The effects of victim impact evidence on the verdicts and sentencing judgments of mock jurors. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 29(3/4), 95-112.
35.
Myers, B., Lynn, S. J., & Arbuthnot, J. (in press). Victim impact testimony and juror judgments. The effects of harm information and witness demeanor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
36.
Nygaard, R. (1996). On the philosophy of sentencing: Or, why punish? Widener Journal of Public Law, 5, 237-268.
37.
Pavlich, G. (1996). The power of community mediation. Law and Society Review, 30(4), 707-733.
Pepinsky, H. (1999). Peacemaking primer. In B. Arrigo (Ed.), Social justice/criminal justice: The maturation of critical theory in law, crime, and deviance (pp. 52-72). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
41.
Pepinsky, H., & Quinney, R. (1991). Criminology as peacemaking. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42.
Posner, R. (2001). Emotions versus emotionalism in law. In S. Bandes (Ed.), The passions of law (pp. 309-329). New York: NYU Press.
43.
Prejean, H. (1993). Dead man walking: An eyewitness account of the death penalty in the United States. New York: Vintage.
Quinney, R. (1998). Criminology as moral philosophy, criminologist as witness. Contemporary Justice Review, 1(2/3), 347-364.
46.
Quinney, R. (2000). Bearing witness to crime and social justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
47.
Sarat, A. D. (1993). Speaking of death: Narratives of violence in capital trials. Law and Society Review, 27, 19.
48.
Sarat, A. D., & Kearns, T. R. (1992). Law's violence. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
49.
Schehr, R. C., & Milovanovic, D. (1999). Conflict mediation and the postmodern: Chaos, catastrophe, and psychoanalytic semiotics. Social Justice, 26(1), 208-232.
50.
Solomon, R. C. (2001). Justice v. vengeance: On law and the satisfaction of emotion. In S. Bandes (Ed.), The passions of law (pp. 123-148). New York: NYU Press.
51.
South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989).
52.
Sullivan, D., & Tifft, L. (2001). Restorative justice: Healing the foundations of our everyday lives. Monsey, NY: Willow Trees Press.
53.
Tsoudis, O., & Smith-Lavin, L. (1998). How bad was it? The effects of victim and perpetrator emotion on responses to criminal court vignettes. Social Forces, 77(2), 695-722.
Umbreit, M. (1999). Avoiding the marginalization and “McDonaldization” of victim-offender mediation: A case study in moving toward the mainstream. In G. Bazemore & L. Walgrave (Eds.), Restoring juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime (pp. 213-234). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
56.
Van den Haag, E. (1982). In defense of the death penalty: A practical and moral analysis. In H. A. Bedau (Ed.), The death penalty in America (3rd ed., pp. 323-241). New York: Oxford University Press.
57.
Van den Haag, E. (1998). Justice, deterrence, and the death penalty. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America's experiment with capital punishment (pp. 139-156). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
58.
Van Ness, D., & Strong, K. H. (1997). Restoring justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
59.
Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
60.
Williams, C. R., & Arrigo, B. A. (2002). Law, psychology, and justice: Chaos theory and the new (dis)order. Albany: State University of New York.
61.
Zehr, H. (1990). Changing lenses. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.
