Although there has been a great deal of public debate concerning matters related to gang data, there has been little research investigating the process by which these data are collected and disseminated. This article uses a multimethodological approach to explore the issues in the production and dissemination of gang statistics in one midwestern gang unit. Unlike previous research examining gang data, the findings of this study did not reveal that the production of gang statistics was influenced, or manipulated, for the benefit of the police organization. Instead, the construction of gang statistics was influenced by serious abnormalities in internal information processing. Gang statistics were not found to be the product of the application of official definitions, or even informal definitions but rather were the product of inadequate communication within the gang unit and between the gang unit and its operating environment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Black, D. (1980). The manners and customs of the police. New York; Academic Press.
2.
Boyd, E., Berk, R., & Hamner, K. (1996). Motivated by hatred or prejudice: Categorization of hate motivated crimes in two police divisions. Law & Society Review, 30, 819-850.
3.
Brownstein, H. (2000). The social production of crime statistics. Justice Research & Policy, 2(2), 73-89.
4.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Law enforcement management and administrative statistics, 1997: Data for individual state and local agencies with 100 or more officers. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
5.
Burrell, S. (1990). Gang evidence: Issues for criminal defense. Santa Clara Law Review, 30, 739-790.
6.
Bursik, R., & Grasmick, H. (1995). Defining gangs and gang behavior. In M. W. Klein, C. Maxson, & J. Miller (Eds.), The modern gang reader (pp. 8-13). Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
7.
Chesney-Lind, M., Rockwell, A., Marker, N., & Reyes, H. (1994). Gangs and delinquency. Crime, Law, & Social Change, 21, 201-228.
8.
Crew, J. (1997). Memo to Orange County district attorney's office. San Francisco: American Civil Liberties Union.
9.
Curry, G. D., Ball, R., & Decker, S. (1996). Estimating the national scope of gang crime from law enforcement data. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
10.
Curry, G. D., Ball, R., Fox, R., & Stone, D. (1992). National assessment of law enforcement antigang information resources. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11.
Decker, S., & Curry, D. (2000). Responding to Gangs: Comparing gang member, police, and task force perspectives. Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 129-137.
12.
Decker, S., & Kempf-Leonard, K. (1991). Constructing gangs: The social definition of youth activities. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 5(4), 271-291.
13.
Garner, J., Schade, T., Hepburn, J., & Fagan, J. (1995). Understanding the use of force by and against the police. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
14.
Goldstein, H. (1967). Administrative problems in controlling the exercise of police authority. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, & Police Science, 58(2), 165-190.
15.
Hagedorn, J. H. (1990). Back in the field again: Gang research in the nineties. In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 240-259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Huff, C. R., & McBride, W. D. (1990). Gangs and police. In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 401-415). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Katz, C. (2001). The establishment of a police gang unit: An examination of organizational and environmental factors. Criminology, 39(1), 301-338.
18.
Katz, C. M., Webb, V., & Schaefer, D. (2000). The validity of police gang intelligence lists: Examining differences in delinquency between documented gang members and non-documented delinquent youth. Police Quarterly, 3(4), 413-437.
19.
Klein, M. W. (1995). The American street gang. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
LaFave, W. (1965). Arrest. Boston: Little, Brown.
21.
Martin, S. (1995). A cross-burning is not just an arson: Police social construction of hate crimes in Baltimore County. Criminology, 3(33), 303-326.
22.
Maxson, C., & Klein, M. (1990). Street gang violence: Twice as great or half as great? In C. R. Huff (Ed.), Gangs in America (pp. 71-100). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
McCorkle, R., & Miethe, T. (1998). The political and organizational response to gangs: An examination of a “moral panic” in Nevada. Justice Quarterly, 15(1), 41-64.
24.
Meehan, A. (2000). The organizational career of gang statistics: The politics of policing gangs. Sociology Quarterly, 41(3), 337-370.
25.
Morash, M. (1983). Gangs, groups, and delinquency. British Journal of Criminology, 23, 309-335.
26.
Office of Juvenile Justice Delinquency Prevention. (1999). 1997 National Youth Gang Survey. Washington DC: Author.
27.
Sherman, L., & Glick, B. (1984). The quality of police arrest statistics. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
28.
Spergel, I. A. (1995). The youth gang problem: A community approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Spergel, I., & Curry, G. D. (1993). Survey of youth gang problems and programs in 45 cities and sites. Chicago: University of Chicago.
30.
Vila, B., & Meeker, J. (1997). A regional gang incident tracking system. Journal of Gang Research, 4, 23-36.
31.
Zatz, M. (1987). Chicano youth gangs and crime: The creation of a moral panic. Contemporary Crises, 11, 129-158.
