The Voices of Domestic Violence Victims: Predictors of Victim Preference for Arrest and the Relationship Between Preference for Arrest and Revictimization
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2003
The Voices of Domestic Violence Victims: Predictors of Victim Preference for Arrest and the Relationship Between Preference for Arrest and Revictimization
This article focuses on what female victims of domestic violence expect the police to do when they call for assistance during an abusive incident and whether there is an association between their desire for formal intervention and subsequent victimization and offender aggression. The 419 victims interviewed in this study had a variety of expectations ranging from simply warning to arresting the offender. A combination of victim characteristics, offender characteristics, and incident characteristics was predictive of victim desire for arrest, and victim desire for arrest was significantly associated with subsequent threat of abuse and actual abuse of the victim. The implications of these findings for preferred and mandatory arrest policies are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abel, E. M., & Suh, E. K. (1987). Use of police services by battered women. Social Work, 32, 526-528.
2.
Bachman, R., & Coker, A. L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offender’s history of violence, and race. Violence and Victims, 10, 91-106.
3.
Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Newton, P. J., & Loseke, D. R. (1984). Cops on call: Summoning the police to the scene of spousal violence. Law and Society Review, 18, 479-498.
4.
Berk, R. A., Black, H., Lilly, J., & Rikoski, G. (1991). Colorado Springs Spouse Assault Replication project: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
5.
Binder, A., & Meeker, J. W. (1988). Experiments as reforms. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 347-358.
6.
Bowker, L. H. (1982). Police services to battered women: Bad or not so bad? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 476-494.
7.
Bowker, L. H. (1984). Battered wives and the police: A national study of usage and effectiveness. Police Studies, 7, 84-93.
8.
Brookoff, D., O’Brien, K. K., Cook, C. S., Thompson, T. D., & Williams, C. (1997). Characteristics of participants in domestic violence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1369-1373.
9.
Buzawa, E. S., & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims: The role of victim preference. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610-623.
10.
Buzawa, E. S., Hotaling, G. T., Klein, A., & Byrne, J. (1999). Response to domestic violence in a pro-active court setting. Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice. Lowell: University of Massachusetts–Lowell.
11.
Conaway, M. R., & Lohr, S. L. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of factors associated with reporting violent crimes to the police. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 23-39.
12.
DeKeseredy, W. W., & MacLean, B. D. (1990) Researching woman abuse in Canada: A left realist critique of the Conflict Tactics Scale. Canadian Review of Social Policy, 25, 19-27.
13.
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71-91.
14.
Dunford, F. W., Huizinga, D., & Elliot, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha police experiment. Criminology, 28, 183-206.
15.
Elliot, D. S. (1989). Criminal justice procedures in family violence crimes. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Family violence (pp. 427-480). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Ford, D. A. (1991). Wife battering and criminal justice: A study of victim decision making. Family Relations, 32, 463-475.
17.
Friedman, L. N., & Schulman, M. (1990). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. In A. J. Lurigio, W. G. Skogan, & R. C. Davis (Eds.), Victims of crime: Problems, policies and programs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Garner, J., & Maxwell, C. (2000). What are the lessons of the police arrest studies? In S. Ward & D. Finkelhor (Eds.), Program evaluation and family violence research (pp. 83-114). New York: Haworth.
19.
Garner, J., Fagan, J., & Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 3-28.
20.
Gondolf, E., Fisher, E., & McFerron, J. (1990). The helpseeking behavior of battered women: An analysis of 6000 shelter interviews. In E. C. Viano (Ed.), The victimology handbook (pp. 113-127). New York: Garland.
21.
Hirschel, J. D., & Hutchison, I. W. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 73-119.
22.
Hirschel, J. D., & Hutchison, I. W. (1996). Realities and implications of the Charlotte Spousal Abuse Experiment. In E. S. Buzawa & C. G. Buzawa (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 54-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
Hirschel, J. D., Hutchison, I. W., & Dean, C. W. (1992). The failure of arrest to deter spouse abuse. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 7-33.
24.
Hirschel, J. D., Hutchison, I. W., Dean, C. W., & Mills, A. (1992). Review essay on the law enforcement response to spouse abuse: Past, present, and future. Justice Quarterly, 9, 247-283.
25.
Hirschel, J. D., Hutchison, I. W., Dean, C. W., Kelley, J. K., & Pesackis, C. E. (1991). Charlotte spouse assault replication project: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
26.
Hutchison, I. W. (1999). The influence of alcohol and drugs on women’s utilization of the police for domestic violence: Report to the National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
27.
Hutchison, I. W., & Hirschel, J. D. (1998). Abused women: Help-seeking strategies and police utilization. Violence Against Women, 4, 436-456.
28.
Hutchison, I. W., & Hirschel, J. D. (2001). The effects of children’s presence on woman abuse. Violence and Victims, 16, 3-17.
29.
Johnson, I. M. (1990). A loglinear analysis of wives’ decisions to call the police in domestic-violence disputes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 18, 147-159.
30.
Jones, D. A., & Belknap, J. (1996, November). Police responses to battering in a pro-arrest jurisdiction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Chicago, IL.
31.
Junger, M. (1990). The measurement of sexual harassment: Comparison of the results of three different instruments. International Review of Victimology, 1, 231-239.
32.
Kantor, G. K., & Straus, M. A. (1990a). Response of victims and the police to assaults on wives. In M. A. Straus & R. A. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 473-487). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
Kantor, G. K., & Straus, M. A. (1990b). The “drunken bum” theory of wife beating. In M. A. Straus & R. J. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 203-234). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
34.
Langan, P., & Innes, C. (1986). U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics special report: Preventing domestic violence against women. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
35.
Lempert, R. (1989). Humility is a virtue: On the publicization of policy relevant research. Law and Society Review, 23, 145-161.
36.
Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the spouse assault replication program. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
37.
Parnas, R. I. (1967, Fall). The police response to the domestic disturbance. Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 914-960.
38.
Pate, A. M., Hamilton, E. E., & Annan, S. (1992). Metro-Dade spouse abuse replication project technical report. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
Schulman, M. A. (1979). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
41.
Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
42.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984a). The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Washington, DC: Police Foundation.
43.
Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984b). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49, 261-272.
44.
Sherman, L. W., & Cohn, E. G. (1989). The impact of research on legal policy: The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Law and Society Review, 23, 117-144.
45.
Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., Collins, et al. (1991). From initial deterrence to long term escalation: Short custody arrest for underclass domestic violence. Criminology, 29, 21-850.
46.
Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Smith, D. A., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., et al. (1992). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology and Criminology, 83, 137-169.
47.
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (Eds.). (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
48.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1988). County and city data book. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
49.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1982). Under the rule of thumb: Battered women and the administration of justice. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
50.
U.S. Department of Justice. (1998). Violence by intimates: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
