This article summarizes the impetus for and findings of the Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project. This project has been a 2-year effort to develop recommendations, which reflect a bipartisan agreement among the stakeholders in the criminal justice and mental health systems to improve the response to people with mental illness who are involved with—or are at risk of involvement with—the criminal justice system. Stakeholders involved in consultations for the project included state lawmakers, police chiefs, officers, sheriffs, district attorneys, public defenders, judges, court administrators, state corrections directors, community corrections officials, victim advocates, consumers of mental health services, family members and other mental health advocates, county commissioners, state mental health directors, behavioral health care providers, and substance abuse experts. The success of the project will hinge largely on how effectively these flexible guidelines are shaped and molded to meet the particular needs within various jurisdictions throughout the country.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bernstein, R., [#0026] Koyanagi, C. (2001). Disintegrating systems: The state of states, public mental health systems. Washington, DC: Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law.
2.
California Board of Corrections. (2000, June). Mentally Ill Offender Crime Reduction Grant Program: Annual report. Retrieved from www.bdcorr.ca.gov/cppd/miocrg/miocrg_publications/miocrg_publications.htm
3.
Cochran, S., Deane, M. W., [#0026] Borum, R. (2000). Improving police response to mentally ill people. Psychiatric Services, 51(10), 1315-1316.
4.
Council of State Governments, Police Executive Research Forum, Pretrial Services Resource Center, Association of State Correctional Administrators Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, and the Center for Behavioral Health Justice, and Public Policy. (2002). Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project. New York: Council of State Governments.
5.
Deane, M. W., Steadman, H. J., Borum, R., Veysey, B. M., [#0026] Morrissey, J. P. (1999). Emerging partnerships between mental health and law enforcement. Psychiatric Services, 50(1), 99-101.
6.
Ditton, P. M. (1999). Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers: Special report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
7.
Fleischner, R. D. (1998). Advance directives for mental health care: An analysis of state statutes. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4.
8.
Grob, G. N. (1994). The mad among us: A history of the care of America's mentally ill. New York: Free Press.
9.
Hasselbrack, A. M. (2001). Opting in to mental health courts. Corrections Compendium, 26(10), 4-25.
10.
Isaac, R. J., [#0026] Armat, V. C. (1990). Madness in the streets: How psychiatry and the law abandoned the mentally ill. New York: Free Press.
11.
Kondo, L. L. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence. Issues, analysis and applications: Advocacy of the establishment of mental health specialty courts in the provision of therapeutic justice for mentally ill offenders. Seattle University Law Review, 24, 373-464.
12.
Kupers, T. A. (1999). Prison madness: The mental health crisis behind bars and what we must do about it. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Lurigio, A. J., [#0026] Swartz, J. A. (2000). Changing contours of the criminal justice system to meet the needs of persons with serious mental illness. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
14.
National Coalition for the Homeless. (1999). NCH Fact Sheet #5. Retrieved from www.nationalhomeless.org/mental.html
15.
National GAINS Center for People with Co-Occurring Disorders in the Justice System. (1999). The courage to change: A guide for communities to create integrated services for people with co-occurring disorders in the justice system. Delmar, NY: Author.
16.
Slate, R. N. (2000). Courts for mentally ill offenders: Necessity or abdication of responsibility. In G. L. Mays [#0026] P. R. Gregware (Eds.), Courts and justice (2nd ed., pp. 432-450). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
17.
Solnit, A. J. (2000, February). The cost and effectiveness of jail diversion: A report to the Joint Standing Committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters pertaining to The Judiciary, Public Health and Appropriations(Unpublished report).
18.
Steadman, H. J. (1992). Boundary spanners: A key component for the effective interactions of the justice and mental health systems. Law and Human Behavior, 16(1), 75-87.
19.
Steadman, H. J., Davidson, S., [#0026] Brown, C. (2001). Mental health courts: Their promise and unanswered questions. Psychiatric Services, 52, 457-458.
20.
Stone, T. H. (1997). Therapeutic implications of incarceration for persons with severe mental disorders: Searching for rational health policy. American Journal of Criminal Law, 24, 283-358.
21.
Teplin, L., [#0026] Abram, K. (1991). Co-occurring disorders among mentally ill jail detainees: Implications for public policy. American Psychologist, 46(10), 1036-1045.
22.
Travis, J., Solomon, A., [#0026] Waul, M. (2001). From prison to home: The dimensions and consequences of prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
23.
Treatment not jail: A plan to rebuild community mental health. (1999, March 17). Sacramento Bee, p. B6.
24.
U.S. Surgeon General. (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General.
25.
Ventura, L. A., Cassel, C. A., Jacoby, J. E., [#0026] Huang, B. (1998,October). Case management and recidivism of mentally ill persons released from jail. Psychiatric Services, 49(10), 1330-1337.
