This article examines congressional testimony preceding the passage of legislation authorizing federal funds for mental health courts and makes the case for the importance of anecdotal evidence in the process. The magnitude of persons with mental illness in the criminal justice system is considered, as well as factors that have led to the criminalization of this population. The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence is discussed, and commonalities in the emergence of mental health courts and methods of supervision are examined. Areas of concern are addressed, and mental health courts are advocated as a commonsense approach to diverting persons with mental illness from the criminal justice system and ensuring linkages to treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allness, D. J., & Knoedler, W. H. (1999). The PACT model of community-based treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses: A manual for PACT start-up. Arlington, VA: National Alliance for the Mentally Ill.
2.
Amador, X., & Johnson, A. L. (2000). I am not sick, I don’t need help: Helping the seriously mentally ill accept treatment, a practical guide for families and therapists. Peconic, NY: Vida Press.
3.
Arredondo, D. E., Kumli, K., Soto, L., Colin, E., Ornellas, J,. Davilla, Jr., et al. (2001). Juvenile mental health court: Rationale and protocols. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 52(4), 1-19.
4.
The Associated Press. (2001, December 26). Court’s focus is on mental health. Chattanooga Times.
5.
Barton, J. (2001, December 26). New court will help mentally ill. Retrieved April 20, 2002, from the Sarasota Herald-Tribune’s Web site, www.heraldtribune.com/2news.cfm?ID=58717
6.
Bureau of Justice Assistance. (2000, September 7). Jefferson County receives Justice Department grant to pursue innovative solutions to local problems. Retrieved April 20, 2002, from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs’s Web site, www.ojp.usdoj.gov/pressreleases/2000/sept7-19.htm
7.
Butterfield, F. (1998, March 5). Prisons replace hospitals for the nation’s mentally ill. The New York Times, pp. 1A, 18A.
8.
Challeen, D. A. (1986). Making it right: A common sense approach to criminal justice. Aberdeen, SD: Melius and Peterson.
9.
City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989).
10.
Davis, P. (2000, April 17). Don’t let Hinckley roam free. Retrieved May 26, 2002 from Time magazine’s Web site, www.time/magazine/printout/0,8816,42859,00html
11.
del Carmen, R. V. (1998). Criminal procedure: Law and practice (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
12.
Ditton, P. M. (1999). Mental health and treatment of inmates and probationers: Special report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13.
Dowie, M. (1982). Pinto madness. In J. H. Skolnick & E. Currie (Eds.), Crisis in American institutions (5th ed., pp. 21-37). Boston: Little, Brown.
14.
Edgar, E. (2001, fall). Assertive community treatment provides jail diversion. NAMI Advocate, 28.
15.
Finkelman, D., & Grisso, T. (1994). Therapeutic jurisprudence: From idea to application. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 20, 243-257.
16.
Florida Commission on Mental Health and Substance Abuse. (2001, January). Final report (Unpublished).
17.
Goldkamp, J. S., & Irons-Guynn, C. (2000). Emerging judicial strategies for the mentally ill in the criminal caseload: Mental health courts in Fort Lauderdale, Seattle, San Bernardino, and Anchorage. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance.
18.
Griffin, P. A., Steadman, H. J., & Petrila, J. (in press). The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services.
19.
Haney, C. (1997). Psychology and the limits to prison pain: Confronting the coming crisis in Eighth Amendment law. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 499-588.
20.
Hardin, H. (1993, July 22). Uncivil liberties. Retrieved April 21, 2002, from the Vancouver Sun’s Web site, www.psychlaws.org/GeneralResources/Article1.htm
21.
Harrison, B. K. (2001, October 15). Butler County treatment alternative court program: Mental health diversion. Cincinnati, OH: Butler County Mental Health Board.
22.
Hasselbrack, A. M. (2001). Opting in to mental health courts. Corrections Compendium, 26(10), 4-25.
23.
Hearing on the impact of mentally ill offenders on the criminal justice system: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2000, September 21).
24.
Hill, R., & Logan, J. (2001, June). Civil liability and mental illness: A proactive model to mitigate claims. The Police Chief, pp. 29-32.
25.
Hogan, M. F. (2000, September, 21). Testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved May 18, 2002, from www.house.gov/judiciary/hoga0921.htm
26.
Jerrell, J. M., & Komisaruk, R. (1991). Public policy issues in the delivery of mental health services in a jail setting. In J. A. Thompson & G. L. Mays, (Eds.), American jails: Public policy issues (pp. 100-115). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
27.
Kalinich, D., Embert, P., & Senese, J. (1991). Mental health services for jail inmates: Imprecise standards, traditional philosophies, and the need for change. In J. A. Thompson & G. L. Mays, (Eds.), American jails: Public policy issues (pp. 79-99). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
28.
Kataoka, M. (2002, February 4). Mental health courts impress, inland: Evaluators say trying to salvage the lives of even violent felons is money well spent. Retrieved April 20, 2002, from The Press Enterprise’s Web site, http://pe.com/localnews/stories/10025187_PE_NEWS_nmental04.html
29.
Kerle, K. E. (1998). American jails: Looking to the future. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
30.
Kittrie, N. N. (1978). The right to be different. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31.
Kondo, L. L. (2000). Therapeutic jurisprudence: Issues, analysis and applications: Advocacy of the establishment of mental health specialty courts in the provision of therapeutic justice for mentally ill offenders. Seattle University Law Review, 24, 373-464.
32.
Leifman, S. (2001, August 16). Mentally ill and in jail. The Washington Post, p. A25.
33.
Lerner-Wren, G. (2000). Broward’s mental health court: An innovative approach to the mentally disabled in the criminal justice system. Community Mental Health Report, 1(1), 5-6, 16.
34.
Lurigio, A. J., & Swartz, J. A. (2000). Changing the contours of the criminal justice system to meet the needs of persons with serious mental illness. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
35.
McCampbell, S. W. (2001). Mental health courts: What sheriffs need to know. Sheriff, 53(2), 40-43.
36.
Miller, R. D. (1997). Symposium on coercion: An interdisciplinary examination of coercion, exploitation, and the law: III. Coerced confinement and treatment: The continuum of coercion: Constitutional and clinical considerations in the treatment of mentally disordered persons. Denver University Law Review, 74, 1169-1214.
37.
Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., McGaha, A., & Boothroyd, R. A. (2001). Preliminary observations from an evaluation of the Broward County mental health court. Court Review, 37, 14-22.
38.
Public Law 106-515, America’s Law Enforcement and Mental Health Project Act. (2000).
39.
Salinger, J. D. (1991). The catcher in the rye. Boston: Little, Brown.
40.
Sargeant, G. (1992, December). Back to bedlam: Mentally ill often jailed without charges. Trial, pp. 96-98.
41.
Sharfstein, S. S. (2000, September 21). Testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved April 21, 2002, from http://www.house.gov/judiciary/shar0921.htm
42.
Sharfstein, S. S. (2001). The case for caring coercion. Catalyst, 3(4), 1-2.
43.
Slate, R. N. (2000). Courts for mentally ill offenders: Necessity or abdication of responsibility. In G. L. Mays & P. R. Gregware (Eds.), Courts and justice (2nd ed., pp. 432-450). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
44.
Solomon, P., & Draine, J. (1995a). Issues in serving the forensic client. Social Work, 40(1), 25-33.
45.
Solomon, P., & Draine, J. (1995b). Jail recidivism in a forensic case management program. Health and Social Work, 20(3), 167-173.
46.
Sperling, A. (2002, winter). House members vote down parity amendment. NAMI Advocate, 1, 16.
47.
Steadman, H. J., Davidson, S., & Brown, C. (2001). Mental health courts: Their promise and unanswered questions. Psychiatric Services, 52(4), 457-458.
48.
Stone, T. H. (1997). Therapeutic implications of incarceration for persons with severe mental disorders: Searching for rational health policy. American Journal of Criminal Law, 24, 283-358.
49.
Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities. (2001). Mental health courts gaining momentum. Update, 7(3), 2.
50.
Torrey, E. F. (1995). Jails and prisons—America’s new mental hospitals. American Journal of Public Health, 85(12), 1611-1613.
51.
Torrey, E. F. (2000, June 19). Keeping the mentally ill out of our jails and in treatment. Panel presentation at the National Sheriffs’ Association Conference, Kansas City, MO.
52.
Treffert, D. A. (1973). Dying with their rights on [Letter]. American Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 1041.
53.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institute of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
54.
Vickers, A. D. (2001). Attorney education about mental illnesses. Catalyst, 3(4), 2-4.
55.
Walker, S. (1989). Sense and nonsense about crime: A policy guide (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
56.
Walsh, J., & Bricourt, J. (1997, July-August). Services for persons with mental illness in jail: Implications for family involvement. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, pp. 420-428.
57.
Watson, A., Hanrahan, P., Luchins, D., & Lurigio, A. (2001). Mental health courts and the complex issue of mentally ill offenders. Psychiatric Services, 52(4), 477-481.
58.
Watson, A., Luchins, D., Hanrahan, P., Heyrman, M. J., & Lurigio, A. (2000). Mental health court: Promises and limitations. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 28, 476-482.
59.
Webdale, K. (2000, September, 21). Testimony before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. House of Representatives. Retrieved April 21, 2002, from www.house.gov/judiciary/webd0921.htm
60.
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1991). Therapeutic jurisprudence as a new approach to mental health law policy analysis and research. University of Miami Law Review, 45, 979-1004.
61.
Winfree, L. T., & Wooldredge, J. D. (1991). Exploring suicides and deaths by natural causes in America’s large jails: A panel study of institutional change, 1978 and 1983. In J. A. Thompson & G. L. Mays (Eds.), American jails: Public policy issues (pp. 63-78). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
62.
Winick, B. J. (1997). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 3, 184-206.
63.
Witness List. (2000). Hearing on the impact of mentally ill offenders on the criminal justice system: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary. U.S. House of Representatives, 106th Cong., 2nd Sess. Retrieved April 21, 2002, from www.house.gov/judiciary/cr
