Adult Versus Juvenile Sanctions: Voices of Incarcerated Youths

Abstract

This article reports findings from face-to-face interviews with youthful offenders in Florida, about half of whom had been transferred to the adult system and half of whom were retained in the juvenile system. The focus is on the youths’global assessments of the impact of their correctional experiences relevant to subsequent offending. The overall impact of each recalled correctional disposition was rated (ranging from beneficial impact to negative impact). For respondents who had experienced multiple correctional dispositions, comparisons were made about the relative impact of low-end versus deepend juvenile commitments and juvenile versus adult sanctions. Youths believed deep-end juvenile placements were most beneficial. Those programs were viewed as having provided education or life skills. When youths viewed adult sanctions as being beneficial, the benefit was linked to the time and pain of prison confinement. Those youths who attributed positive impact to prison had “skipped” deep-end juvenile placements.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Altschuler, D. M. (1998). Intermediate sanctions and community treatment for serious and violent juvenile offenders. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 367-385). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bishop, D. M. , & Frazier, C. E. (2000). Consequences of waiver. In J. Fagan & F. E. Zimring (Eds.), The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court (pp. 227-276). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bishop, D. M. , Frazier, C. E. , Lanza-Kaduce, L. , & White, H. G. (1998). Juvenile transfers to criminal court study: Phase 1 final report. Submitted for publication.

Bishop, D. M. , Frazier, C. E. , Lanza-Kaduce, L. , & Winner, L. (1996). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Does it make a difference? Crime & Delinquency, 42, 171-191.

Fagan, J. (1991). The comparative impacts of juvenile and criminal court sanctions on adolescent felony offenders. Final report. Submitted for publication.

Fagan, J. (1995). Separating the men from the boys: The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. In J. C. Howell , B. Krisberg , J. D. Hawkins , & J. J. Wilson (Eds.). Serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders: A sourcebook (pp. 238-260). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fagan, J. (1996). The comparative advantage of juvenile versus criminal court sanctions on recidivism among adolescent felony offenders. Law & Policy, 18, 77-114.

Fisher, L. (2000, June 28). Cuts leave few options for judges. The Gainesville Sun, pp. 1A-1A, 4A-4A.

10.

Forst, M. , Fagan, J. , & Vivona, S. (1989). Youth in prisons and training schools: Perceptions and consequences of the treatment custody dichotomy. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 39, 1-14.

11.

Frazier, C. E. , Bishop, D. M , & Lanza-Kaduce, L. (1999). Get-tough juvenile justice reforms: The Florida experience. ANNALS, 564, 167-184.

12.

Jensen, E. L. , & Metsger, L. K (1994). A test of the deterrent effect of legislative waiver on violent juvenile crime. Crime & Delinquency, 40, 96-104.

13.

Juvenile Justice Advisory Board . (1998). 1998 outcome evaluation report (Vol. 1, Document #98-001-OE). Tallahassee, FL: Juvenile Justice Advisory Board.

14.

Mays, G. L. , & Gregware, P. R. (1996). The children’s code reform movement in New Mexico: The politics of expediency. Law & Policy, 18, 179-193.

15.

Sanchez, R. , & Booth, W. (2000, March 13). California toughens juvenile crime laws: Rules to treat young offenders more like adults. Washington Post, p. A03-A03.

16.

Singer, S. I. (1996). Recriminalizing delinquency: Violent juvenile crime and juvenile justice reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Singer, S. I. , & McDowall, D. (1988). Criminalizing delinquency: The deterrent effects of the New York juvenile offender law. Law & Society Review, 22, 521-535.

18.

Snyder, H. N. , & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 national report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

19.

Torbet, P. , Gable, R. , Hurst, H., IV , Montgomery, I. , Szymanski, L. , &, Thomas, D. (1996). State responses to serious and violent juvenile crime. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

20.

Travis, J. (2000). But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

21.

Tunnell, K. D. (1990). Choosing crime: Close your eyes and take your chances. Justice Quarterly, 7, 673-690.

22.

White, H. G. , Frazier, C. E. , Lanza-Kaduce, L. , & Bishop, D. M. (1999). A socio-legal history of Florida’s juvenile transfer reforms. University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy, 10, 249-275.

23.

Winner, L. , Lanza-Kaduce, L. , Bishop, D. M. , & Frazier, C. E. (1997). The transfer of juveniles to criminal court: Reexamining recidivism over the long term. Crime & Delinquency, 43, 548-563.