Can the same risk classification instrument be used for both female and male prisoners? The authors answer this question using data for federal prisoners by comparing female and male prison violence rates and by comparing the predictive validity of a risk classification instrument used to predict female and male violence. The authors find women commit less violence and less serious violence than men. However, despite these gender differences, they find the same classification instrument predicts violent behavior equally well for women and men. Taken together, these results lead the authors to argue for correctional policies requiring separate classification systems for women and men.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrews, D. A.
, & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
2.
Andrews, D. A.
, Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.
3.
Berk, R. A.
, & de Leeuw, J. (1999). An evaluation of California's inmate classification system using a generalized regression discontinuity design. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 1045-1052.
4.
Blume, S. B.
(1990). Chemical dependency in women: Important issues. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 16, 297-307.
5.
Brame, R.
, Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14, 245-261.
6.
Brennan, T.
(1987). Classification for control in jails and prisons. In D. M. Gottfredson & M. Tonry (Eds.), Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision making (pp. 323-366). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Brennan, T.
(1998). Institutional classification of females: Problems and some proposals for reform. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 179-204). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
8.
Burke, P.
, & Adams, L. (1991). Classification for women offenders in state correctional facilities: A handbook for practitioners. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
9.
Camp, C. G.
, & Camp, G. M. (1999). The corrections yearbook: Adult corrections. Middletown, CT: Criminal Justice Institute.
10.
Chesney-Lind, M.
(1997). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11.
Clogg, C. C.
, Petkova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1261-1293.
12.
Covington, S. S.
(1998). The relational theory of women's psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 113-131). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
13.
Durkheim, E.
(1986). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York: Free Press.
14.
Farr, K. A.
(2000). Classification for female inmates: Moving forward. Crime & Delinquency, 46, 3-17.
15.
Forcier, M. W.
(1995). Massachusetts Department of Corrections female offender objective classification technical assistance project. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.
16.
Fowler, L. T.
(1993). What classification for women? Classification: A tool for managing today's offenders. Laurel, MD: American Correctional Association.
17.
Greenfeld, L. A.
, & Snell, T. L. (1999). Women offenders. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
Harer, M. D.
(1994). Recidivism of federal prison releasees in 1987: A preliminary report. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
19.
Harer, M. D.
(1995). Prison education program participation and recidivism: A test of the normalization hypothesis. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
20.
Harer, M. D.
(1999). Money, organization, and leadership: Escape risk of high level drug offenders in federal prisons. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
21.
Harer, M. D.
, & Steffensmeier, D. J. (1996). Race and prison violence. Criminology, 34(3), 323-351.
22.
Hirschi, T.
(1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Kane, T. R.
(1986). The validity of prison classification: An introduction to practical considerations and research issues. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 367-390.
24.
Kane, T. R.
, & Saylor, W. G. (1983). Security designation: A validation study. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
25.
Karacki, L.
, & Harer, M. D. (1997). Is there a new offender?Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons.
26.
Lewis, L. (1999). Dimensions of crime among female prisoners: A multi-theoretical analysis. Unpublished master's thesis, Portland State University, Portland, OR.
27.
Mondanaro, J.
(1989). Chemically dependent women: Assessment and treatment. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28.
Morash, M.
, Bynum, T. S., & Koons, B. A. (1998). Women offenders: Programming needs and promising approaches. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
29.
Owen, B.
(1998). In the mix: Struggle and survival in a women's prison. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
Proctor, J. L.
(1994). Evaluating a modified version of the federal prison system's inmate classification modes: An assessment of objectivity and predictive validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21(2), 256-272.
31.
Quinsey, V. L.
, Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
Rice, M. E.
, & Harris, G. T. (1995). Violent recidivism: Assessing predictive validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 737-748.
33.
Richie, B. E.
(1996). Compelled to crime: The gender entrapment of battered Black women. New York: Routledge.
34.
Steffensmeier, D.
(1983). Sex-segregation in the underworld: Building a sociological explanation of sex differences in crime. Social Forces, 61, 1010-1032.
35.
Steffensmeier, D.
, & Allen, E. (1998). The nature of female offending: Patterns and explanation. In R. T. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 5-29). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
36.
Steffensmeier, D. J.
, & Allen, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
37.
Sutherland, E. H.
, & Cressey, D. R. (1978). Criminology (10th ed.). New York: Lippincott.
38.
Swets, J. A.
, Dawes, R. M., & Monahan, J. (2000, October). Better decisions through science. Scientific American, 283(4), 82-87.
39.
Toby, J.
(1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 48, 12-17.
