Prisoner Reentry: Current Trends,Practices,and Issues

Abstract

After three decades of passing laws and implementing policies designed to dramatically increase the nation's prison population and harden the conditions of confinement, there is a newfound interest among policy makers and criminologists in prisoner release. Using national data and a survey of eight states, this article examines the current “state of the art” of prisoner reentry. Not surprisingly, most state prison systems are ill equipped to ease the transition of inmates from prison to the community. A significant portion of released inmates pose minimal risk to public safety. Parole supervision increasingly results in ex-convicts' being reincarcerated for noncriminal behavior or misdemeanor crimes. For most inmates, reentry should be curtailed by either eliminating supervision or greatly shortening the period of supervision.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin, J. (1986). Using early release to relieve prison crowding. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 404-502.

Austin, J. (1989). Parole outcome in California: The consequences of determinate sentencing, punishment, and incapacitation on parole performance. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

Austin, J. , & Irwin, J. (2000). It's about time: America's imprisonment binge (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Wadsworth.

Austin, J. , Repko, S. , Harris, R. , McGinnis, K. , & Plant, S. (1998, May). Evaluation of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice administrative segregation population. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections.

Blumstein, A. , Cohen, J. , Roth, J. , & Visher, C. A. (Eds.). (1986). Career criminals and “career criminals” (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Criminal Justice Institute . (1999). Corrections Yearbook 1998. Middleton, CN: Author.

Hanson, K. R. 1997. The development of a Brief Actuarial Risk Scale for sexual offense recidivism. Ottawa, Canada: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Public Works and Government Services Canada.

Horn, M. F. (1999, August 24). Rethinking sentencing. Paper prepared for the National Institute of Justice Executive Sessions on Sentencing and Corrections. (Revised February 1, 2000)

McGinnis, K. , & Austin, J. (2001). Texas board parole and pardon guidelines project. Phase II. Austin, TX: Texas Board Parole and Pardons.

10.

Petersilia, J. (1998). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? In National Institute of Justice (Ed.), Perspectives on crime and justice. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

11.

Petersilia, J. (1999a). Parole and prison reentry in the United States. In M. Tonry & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Prisons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

12.

Petersilia, J. (1999b). Prisoner reentry. In J. Travis (Ed.), But they all come back: Rethinking prisoner reentry (Research in Brief). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.

13.

Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council . (2000). Bi-annual report. Austin, TX: Author.

14.

U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics . (1989, April). Recidivism of prisoners released in 1983. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

15.

U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics . (1999, January). Special report. Truth in sentencing in state prisons. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.