This article considers the ethical problems engendered by random assignment and privacy concerns in randomized field experiments. The particular focus is on procedural, legislative, and technical approaches to reducing or avoiding the problems. Examples are given from a variety of disciplines, although the main emphasis is on research in crime and delinquency.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Boruch, R. F.
(1997). Randomized experiments for planning and evaluation: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Boruch, R. F.
, & Cecil, J. S. (1979). Assuring the confidentiality of social research data. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
3.
Boruch, R. F.
, & Foley, E. (2000). The honestly experimental society: Using organization and other entities as units in randomized experiments. In L. Bickman (Ed.), Donald F. Campbell's legacy (pp. 193-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Boruch, R. F.
, & Terhanian, G. (1998). Cross design synthesis. In A. J. Reynolds and H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Advances in educational productivity (Vol. 7, pp. 59-86). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
5.
Breger, M. J.
(1983). Randomized experiments and the law. In R. F. Boruch & J. J. Cecil (Eds.), Solutions to ethical and legal problems in social research (pp. 97-144). New York: Academic Press.
6.
Britt, C. L.
, Gottfredson, M. R., & Goldkamp, J. S. (1992). Drug testing and pretrial misconduct: An experiment on the specific deterrent effects of drug monitoring defendants on pretrial release. Journal of Crime and Delinquency, 29(1), 62-78.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. (1992). Survey of criminal history information systems. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
Cecil, J. S., & Wetherington, G. T. (Eds.). (1996). Court ordered disclosure of academic research: A clash of values of science and law [Special issue]. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(3).
9.
Conner, R. F.
(1977). Selecting a control group: An analysis of the randomization process in twelve social reform programs. Evaluation Quarterly, 1(2), 195-243.
10.
Federal Judicial Center
. (1981). Social experimentation and the law. Washington, DC: Author.
11.
Fellegi, I. P.
, & Sunter, A. B. (1969). A theory for record linkage. Journal of American Statistical Association, 40, 1183-1120.
12.
Garner, J.
, Fagin, J., & Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spouse assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11(10), 3-28.
13.
Hammick, P. A.
, & Gastwirth, J. L. (1994). Group testing for sensitive characteristics: Extension to higher prevalence levels. International Statistical Review, 62(3), 319-331.
14.
Horn, J.
(1999, October). National Center for Health Statistics approaches to the release of micro-data: Perturbation and the research data center. Paper presented at the Workshop on Confidentiality of and Access to Research Data Files, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
15.
International Statistical Institute
. (2000). Declaration of professional ethics. Available: http://www.cbs.nl.isi.ethics.htm
16.
Jaro, M. A.
(1989). Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 414-420.
17.
Kaye, D. H.
, & Freedman, D. A. (1994). Reference guide on statistics. In Federal Judicial Center (Ed.), Reference manual on scientific evidence (pp. 331-414). Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
18.
Lind, E. A.
, Shapard, J. E., & Cecil, J. S. (1994). Methods for empirical evaluation of innovations in the justice system. In J. Monahan & L. Walker (Eds.), Social science in law: Cases and materials (pp. 57-61). Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
19.
McMillen, M.
(1999, October). National Center for Education Statistics: Data licensing agreements. Paper presented at the Workshop on Confidentiality of and Access to Research Data Files, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
20.
Murray, D. M.
(1998). Design and analysis of group randomized trials. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Office of Human Subjects Research
. (2000). Human subjects protections. Available: http://helix.nih.gov:8001.ohsr/
22.
Riccio, J. A.
(1999). Mobilizing public housing communities for work: Origins and early accomplishments of the jobs plus demonstration. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
23.
Ritter, G.
& Boruch, R. F. (1999). The political and institutional origins of Tennessee's experiment on class size. Educational Evaluation and Policy analysis, 21, 111-125.
24.
Roth, J. A.
, & Shlolz, J. T. (Eds.). (1988). Taxpayer compliance: Vol. 2. Social science perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
25.
Schwartz, R. D.
, & Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34, 282-300.
26.
Sherman, L.
, & Weisburd, D. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 635-648.
27.
Sherman, L. W.
, Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.
28.
Spencer, M.
(1997). Proposal for a randomized experiment on the effects of scholarships awards to high achieving students from law income families. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, CHANGES.
29.
Staines, G. L.
, McKendrick, K., Perlis, T., Sacks, S., & DeLeon, G. (1999). Sequential assignment and treatment on usual alternatives to standard experimental designs in field studies of treatment efficacy. Evaluation Review, 23(1), 47-76.
30.
U.S. General Accounting Office
. (1998). Immigration statistics: Information gaps, quality issues limit utility of federal data to policy makers (Report No. GAO.GGD-98-164). Washington, DC: Author.
31.
U.S. General Accounting Office
. (1999). Survey methodology: An innovative method for estimating sensitive survey items (Report No. GAO/GGD-00-30). Washington, DC: Author.
32.
Winick, B.
(1981). A preliminary analysis of legal limitations on rehabilitative alternatives in corrections and correctional research. In S. Martin, L. Sechrest, & R. Redner (Eds.), New directions in the rehabilitation of criminal offenders. Washington, DC: National Academy.
33.
Zhu, S.
(1999). A method to obtain a randomized control group where it seems impossible. Evaluation Review, 23(4), 363-377.
