Legal Issues of Randomized Experiments on Sanctioning

Abstract

In 1981, the Federal Judicial Center proposed guidelines for balancing risks of experimentation against their supposed benefits. The ethical rules were supposed to be within the scope of American legal and constitutional justification. These guidelines would not fulfill the same criterion in Germany, especially if risks to the individual are weighed against benefits toward the society. Randomization in criminal law cannot be justified by the constitutional principle of freedom of research or by the need to gain empirical knowledge about the effectiveness of sanctions. Unequal treatment in randomized designs can only be justified if randomization is permitted for reasons other than experimentation and if the individuals give their free and informed consent. The principle of informed consent must be extended from a procedural to a material content, which guarantees that participants are not forced to take part in an experiment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bayer, W. (1989). Akteneinsicht zu Forschungszwecken—BverwG NJW 1986, 1277, und BverfG, NJW 1986, 1243 [The right of researchers to use official files for scientific research]. Juristische Schulung, 3, 191-194.

Bock, M. (1994). Prävention und Empirie—Über das Verhältnis von Strafzwecken und Erfahrungswissen [Prevention and empirical knowledge: On the relation between the justification of criminal law and scientific experience]. Juristische Schulung, 2, 89-99.

Böllinger, L. (1994). Grenzenloses symbolisches Strafrecht. Zum Cannabis-Beschluβ des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [The unlimited symbolism of criminal law: The decision of the federal court on the prohibition of cannabis]. Kritische Justiz, 4, 405-420.

Boruch, R. F. (1998). Randomized controlled experiments for evaluation and planning. In L. Bickman & D.J. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 161-191). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brentjes, B. (Ed.). (1992). Wissenschaft under dem NS-Regime. Schöneiche b [Science under the regime of national socialism]. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.

Depenheuer, O. (1993). Zufall als Rechtsprinzip. Der Losentscheid im Rechtsstaat [Randomization as a legal principle]. Juristenzeitung, 4, 171-180.

Federal Judicial Center (FJC) . (1981). Experimentation in the law: Report of the Federal Judicial Center Advisory Committee on Experimentation in the Law. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Hassemer, W. (1990). Einführung in die Grundlagen des Strafrechts [Introduction into the fundamental principles of criminal law]. Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.

Jakobs, G. (1993). Strafrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. Die Grundlagen und die Zurechnungslehre. Lehrbuch (2.Aufl.) [Criminal law: General principles and the rules of attribution]. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.

10.

Joerden, J. C. (1998). Bedingungen der Akzeptanz medizinischer Versuche am Menschen [Conditions for acceptance of medical experimentation with humans]. In J. C. Joerden (Ed.), Der Mensch und seine Behandlung in der Medizin. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

11.

Klee, E. (1997). Auschwitz, die NS-Medizin und ihre Opfer [Auschwitz, the Nazi medicine, and its victims]. Frankfurt on the Main, Germany: S. Fischer.

12.

Lorenz, D. (1993). Wissenschaft darf nicht alles! Zur Bedeutung der Rechte anderer als Grenze grundrechtlicher Gewährleistung [Science is not without restrictions! On the meaning of others' rights as a limit to the constitutional promise of a free science]. In P. Badura & R. Scholz (Eds.), Wege und Verfahren des Verfassungslebens. FS Peter Lerche zum 65. Geburtstag (pp. 267-280). Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.

13.

Marxen, K. (1985). Strafgesetzgebung als Experiment? Gesetzesexperimente in strafrechtlicher Sicht [Legislation in criminal law as experiment? Experimental laws from criminal law perspective]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 132(12), 533-584.

14.

Mitscherlich, A. , & Mielke, F. (1995). Medizin ohne Menschlichkeit. Dokumente des Nürnberger Ärzteprozesses [Medicine without humanity. Documents of the Nuremberg trial against the Nazi doctors]. Frankfurt on the Main, Germany: Fischer Taschenbuchverlag.

15.

Ortmann, R. (1994). Zur Evaluation der Sozialtherapie. Ergebnisse einer experimentellen Längsschnittstudie zu Justizvollzugsanstalten des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen [On the evaluation of social therapy in prison: Results from a longitudinal study on prisons in North Rhine-Westphalia]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 106(4) 782-821.

16.

Roxin, C. (1994). Strafrecht, Allgemeiner Teil, Band I, Grundlagen: Der Aufbau der Verbrechenslehre [Criminal laws' general principles: Vol. 1. The structure of dogmatics on crime] (2.Aufl.). Munich, Germany: C.H. Beck.

17.

Schumann, K. F. (1989). Positive Generalprävention. Ergebnisse und Chancen der Forschung [Positive general prevention: Results and chances of research]. Heidelberg, Germany: C.F. Müller.

18.

Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence. New York: Free Press.