This study used panel data from a sample of cities and counties to examine the effects of curfew laws on youth crime rates. The analysis estimated the impact of new and revised laws on juvenile homicide victimizations (1976 to 1995) and on juvenile arrests for a variety of offenses (1985 to 1996). The results show statistically significant decreases in burglary, larceny, and simple assault arrests after revised laws, but only in the county data. Homicide rates did not change in either counties or cities, and new laws were not followed by reductions in crime. Any preventive effects of curfews appear to be small.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, Kenneth
. 1997. “Juvenile Curfews as Crime Prevention.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, November, San Diego, CA.
2.
Baumer, Eric
, Janet L. Lauritsen, Richard Rosenfeld, and Richard Wright. 1998. “The Influence of Crack Cocaine on Robbery, Burglary, and Homicide Rates: A Cross-City Longitudinal Analysis.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency35:316-340.
3.
Blumstein, Alfred
. 1995. “Youth Violence, Guns, and the Illicit-Drug Industry.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology86:10-36.
4.
Cameron, A. Colin
and Pravin K. Trivedi. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cook, Philip J.
and John H. Laub. 1998. “The Unprecedented Epidemic of Youth Violence.” Pp. 27-64 in Youth Violence (Crime and Justice, Vol. 24), edited by M. H. Moore and M. Tonry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
Crowell, Anthony
. 1996. “Minor Restrictions: The Challenge of Juvenile Curfews.”Public Management78(8):4-9.
7.
Davidson, Russell
and James G. MacKinnon. 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Diggle, Peter J.
, Kung-Yee Liang, and Scott Zeger. 1994. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
Fritsch, Eric J.
, Tory J. Caeti, and Robert W. Taylor. 1999. “Gang Suppression Through Saturation Patrol, Aggressive Curfew, and Truancy Enforcement: A Quasi-Experimental Test of the Dallas Anti-Gang Initiative.”Crime & Delinquency45:122-139.
10.
Hemmens, Craig
and Katherine Bennett. 1999. “Juvenile Curfews and the Courts: Judicial Response to a Not-So-New Crime Control Strategy.”Crime & Delinquency45:99-121.
11.
Hsaio, Cheng
. 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Hunt, A. Lee
and Ken Weiner. 1977. “The Impact of a Juvenile Curfew: Suppression and Displacement in Patterns of Juvenile Offenses.”Journal of Police Science and Administration5:407-412.
13.
Kao, Chihwa
. 1999. “Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data.”Journal of Econometrics90:1-44.
14.
Levin, Andrew
and Chien-Fu Lin. 1992. “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties.” Discussion Paper No. 92-23, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, CA.
15.
Levin, Andrew
and Chien-Fu Lin. 1993. “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: New Results.” Discussion Paper No. 93-56, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, CA.
16.
Liang, Kung-Yee
and Scott L. Zeger. 1986. “Longitudinal Data Analysis Using Generalized Linear Models.”Biometrika3:13-22.
17.
Loftin, Colin
, and Robert Nash Parker. 1985. “An Errors-In-Variable Model of the Effect of Poverty on Urban Homicide Rates.”Criminology23:269-285.
18.
McDowall, David
. 1986. “Poverty and Homicide in Detroit, 1928-1976.”Violence and Victims1:23-34.
19.
Maguire, Kathleen
and Ann L. Pastore, eds. 1997. Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1996. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
20.
Males, Mike A.
and Dan Macallair. 1999. “An Analysis of Curfew Enforcement and Juvenile Crime in California.”Western Criminology Review1 [On-line]. Available: http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n2/males.html.
21.
Markides, Kyriakos S.
and Connie McFarland. 1982. “A Note on Recent Trends in the Infant Mortality-Socioeconomic Status Relationship.”Social Forces61:268-276.
22.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP)
. 1996. Curfew: An Answer to Juvenile Delinquency and Victimization?OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
23.
Ruefle, William
and Kenneth Mike Reynolds. 1995. “Curfews and Delinquency in Major American Cities.”Crime & Delinquency41:347-363.
24.
Ruefle, William
and Kenneth Mike Reynolds. 1996. “Keep Them At Home: Juvenile Curfew Ordinances in 200 American Cities.”American Journal of Police15:63-84.
25.
Sherman, Lawrence W.
, Denise C. Gottfredson, Doris L. MacKenzie, John Eck, Peter Reuter, and Shawn D. Bushway. 1998. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Research in Brief. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
26.
Sickmund, Melissa
, Howard N. Snyder, and Eileen Poe-Yamagata. 1997. Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1997 Update on Violence. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
27.
U.S. Conference of Mayors
. 1998. A Status Report on Youth Curfews in America's Cities: A 347-City Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Conference of Mayors.
28.
Wilson, James Q.
1995. “Crime and Public Policy.” Pp. 489-507 in Crime, edited by James Q. Wilson and Joan Petersilia. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
