The effects of demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables on the domestic violence arrest decision were investigated using official data and officer attitudinal data. We examined some variables never before studied in this context (e.g., the demographic characteristics of officers) and improved on the measurement of many variables (e.g., victim cooperativeness, victim injury, and time of shift). Logit analyses clarified those factors that significantly impacted the arrest decision and identified how officers arrived at a determination of a victim's cooperativeness. The findings supported previous research that has highlighted the importance of situational variables in the arrest decision.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, John
and Forrest D. Nelson. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2.
Belknap, Joanne
. 1995. “Law Enforcement Officers' Attitudes About the Appropriate Response to Woman Battering.”International Review of Victimology4:47-62.
3.
Berk, Sarah F.
and Donileen R. Loseke. 1981. “ `Handling' Family Violence: Situational Determinants of Police Arrest in Domestic Disturbances.”Law and Society Review15:317-346.
4.
Bittner, Egon
. 1990. Aspects of Police Work. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
5.
Black, Donald J.1971. “The Social Organization of Arrest.”Stanford Law Review23:1087-1111.
6.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1996. Female Victims of Violent Crime. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
7.
Bureau of Justice Statistics
. 1997. Sex Differences in Violent Victimization, 1994. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
8.
Buzawa, Eve S.
and Thomas Austin. 1993. “Determining Police Response to Domestic Violence Victims: The Role of Victim Preference.”American Behavioral Scientist36:610-623.
9.
Buzawa, Eve S.
and Carl G. Buzawa. 1993. “Opening the Doors: The Changing Police Response to Domestic Violence.” Pp. 551-567 in Critical Issues in Policing, edited by R. G. Dunham and G. P. Alpert. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
10.
Davis, Phillip W.1983. “Restoring the Semblance of Order: Police Strategies in the Domestic Disturbance.”Symbolic Interaction6:261-278.
11.
Eigenberg, Helen M.
, Kathryn E. Scarborough, and Victor E. Kappeler. 1996. “Contributory Factors Affecting Arrest in Domestic and Non-Domestic Assaults.”American Journal of Police15:27-54.
12.
Feder, Lynette
. 1996. “Police Handling of Domestic Calls: The Importance of Offender's Presence in the Arrest Decision.”Journal of Criminal Justice24:481-490.
Hendricks, James E.
1992. “Domestic Violence Legislation in the United States: A Survey of the States.” Pp. 213-226 in Intimate Violence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by E. C. Viano. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
15.
Holmes, William M.1993. “Police Arrests for Domestic Violence.”American Journal of Police12:101-125.
16.
Homant, Robert J.
and Daniel B. Kennedy. 1985. “Police Perceptions of Spouse Abuse: A Comparison of Male and Female Officers.”Journal of Criminal Justice13:29-47.
17.
Klinger, David A.1995. “Policing Spousal Assault.”Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency32:308-324.
18.
Klinger, David A.1996. “More on Demeanor and Arrest in Dade County.”Criminology34:61-79.
19.
Long, J. Scott
. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Manning, Peter K.1993. “The Preventive Conceit: The Black Box in Market Context.”American Behavioral Scientist36:639-650.
21.
Martin, Susan E.
1993. “Female Officers on the Move? A Status Report on Women in Policing.” Pp. 327-347 in Critical Issues in Policing, 2nd ed., edited by R. G. Dunham and G. P. Alpert. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
22.
Maxfield, Michael G.
and Earl Babbie. 1995. Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
23.
Morash, Merry
and Jack Greene. 1986. “Evaluating Women on Patrol: A Critique of Contemporary Wisdom.”Evaluation Review10:230-255.
24.
Muir, William K. Jr.
1977. Police: Streetcorner Politicians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Niederhoffer, Arthur
. 1967. Behind the Shield: The Police in Urban Society. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
26.
Robinson, Amanda L.
and Meghan S. Chandek. 1998. “Investigating the Impact of Community Policing on Domestic Violence at Two Levels: Responding Officers and Detectives.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, November 11-14, Washington, DC.
27.
Saunders, Daniel G.1995. “The Tendency to Arrest Victims of Domestic Violence: A Preliminary Analysis of Officer Characteristics.”Journal of Interpersonal Violence10:147-158.
28.
Smith, Douglas A.1987. “Police Response to Interpersonal Violence: Defining the Parameters of Legal Control.”Social Forces65:767-782.
29.
Stalans, Loretta J.
and Mary A. Finn. 1995. “How Novice and Experienced Officers Interpret Wife Assaults: Normative and Efficiency Frames.”Law and Society Review29:287-321.
30.
Stark, Evan
. 1993. “Mandatory Arrest of Batterers: A Reply to Its Critics.”American Behavioral Scientist36:651-680.
31.
U.S. Bureau of the Census
. 1990. 1990 Census: Detailed Population Characteristics. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
32.
Van Maanen, John
. 1978. “Observations on the Making of Policemen.” Pp. 292-308 in Policing: A View From the Street, edited by P. K. Manning and J. Van Maanen. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
33.
Walker, Samuel
, Cassia Spohn, and Miriam DeLone. 1996. The Color of Justice: Race, Ethnicity, and Crime in America. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
Worden, Alissa Pollitz
. 1993. “The Attitudes of Women and Men in Policing: Testing Conventional and Contemporary Wisdom.”Criminology31:203-237.
35.
Worden, Robert E.1989. “Situational and Attitudinal Explanations of Police Behavior: A Theoretical Reappraisal and Empirical Assessment.”Law and Society Review23:677-711.
36.
Worden, Robert E.
and Alissa A. Pollitz. 1984. “Police Arrests in Domestic Disturbances: A Further Look.”Law and Society Review18:105-119.
