Science and practice cannot continue together without a major attitudinal
shiA a broadening perspective of science and practice and how these two activities
can be integrated to strengthen each other. This article represents the
culmination of a 2-year project that examined the roles of science and practice
within counseling psychology. The central goal of the article is to present (a)
specific recommendations for promoting the integration of science and practice
within Division 17 and (b) suggest specific strategies for implementing the
recommendations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barlow, D. H. , Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1984). The scientist-practitioner: Research and
accountability in clinical and educational settings. New
York: Pergamon.
2.
Barrom, C. P. , Shadish, W. R., Jr., Montgomery, L. M. (1988). Ph.D.'s Psy.D.'s & real-world
constraints on scholar activities: Another look at the Boulder
model. Professional Psychology: Research &
Practice, 19,
93-101.
3.
Brotemarkle, R. A. (1947). Fifty years of clinical psychology,
1896-1946. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
11, 1-4.
4.
Calhoun, J. F. , & Green, C. (1984). Perspectives of psychology training
clinics from training and clinic directors. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 15,
371-378.
5.
Carter, J. A. , & Fassinger, R. E. (1990, August). Can this marriage be saved? Renewed commitment
to science and practice. In P. P. Heppner (Chair),
Promoting science within counseling: Implications for the
scientist-practitioner model.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Boston.
6.
Claibom, C. D. , Gelso, C. J., & Stone, G. L. (1990, August). What should our journals be?
In P. Paul Heppner (Chair),Promoting science within counseling:
Implications for the scientist-practitioner model.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Boston.
7.
Conway, J. B. (1988). Differences among clinical psychologists:
Scientists, practitioners, and scientist-practitioners.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,
19, 642-655.
8.
Galassi, J. P. , & Brooks, L. (1990, August). Improving training models in counseling
psychology: Practicum is the key. In P. P. Heppner (Chair),
Promoting science within counseling: Implications for the
scientist-practitioner model.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Boston.
9.
Harmon, L. (1982). Scientific affairs-the next
decade. The Counseling Psychologist10(2),
31-37.
10.
Harmon, L. (1990, August). Discussant. In P. P. Heppner
(Chair), Promoting science within counseling: Implications for the
scientist-practitioner model.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Boston.
11.
Haynes, S. N. , Lemsky, C., & Sexton-Radek, K. (1987). Why clinicians infrequently do
research?Professional Psychology: Research & Practice,
18, 515-519.
12.
Heppner, P. P. , & Anderson, W. P. (1985). On the perceived non-utility of research
in counseling. Journal of Counseling and
Development, 63,
545-547.
13.
Holloway, E. L. , & Wampold, B. E. (1990, August). The divorce of the scientist-practitioner:
Irreconcilable differences, mental anguish, or adultery. In P. P.
Heppner (Chair), Promoting science within counseling: Implications for
the scientist-practitioner model.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Boston.
14.
Jarmon, H. , & Halgin, R. P. (1987). The role of the psychology department
clinic in training scientist-professions. Professional
Psychology: Research and Practice, 18,
509-514.
15.
Korman, M. (1976). Levels and patterns of professional training in
psychology: Conference proceedings, Vail, Colorado, July
25-30, 1973.Washington, DC: American Psychological
Association.
16.
Raimy, V. C. (Ed.). (1950). Training in clinical psychology (Boulder
Conference).New York: Prentice-Hall.
17.
Simon, N. (1990, August). Discussant. In P. P. Heppner
(Chair), Promoting science within counseling: Implications for the
scientist-practitioner model.Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Association, Boston.
