A method is described that permits answering research questions of general importance by examining individuals in a comprehensive, whole-person manner. The method requires that research questions be formulated in advance and that the person studied be carefully selected for suitability. It also requires the acquisition and analysis of data on symbolic structures, which are systems of meaning and action that define personal identity. Q-technique and the role repertory test are valuable techniques for use in research with individuals. Their use in two studies of persons with spinal cord injuries is described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bannister, D. , & Mair, J. (1968). The evaluation of personal constructs. New York: Academic.
2.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. Leeds, England: Leeds Books.
3.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Elstein, A. S. , & Bordage, G. (1979). Psychology of clinical reasoning. In G. C. Stone, F. Cohen, & N. E. Adler (Eds.), Health psychology (pp. 335-367). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Epting, F. (1984). Personal construct counseling and psychotherapy. New York: John Wiley.
6.
Fink, S. (1967). Crisis and motivation: A theoretical model. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 48, 592-597.
7.
Flanagan, J. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
8.
Fransella, F. , & Bannister, D. (1977). A manual for the repertory grid technique. New York: Academic.
9.
Goldman, L. (1979). Research is more than technology. The Counseling Psychologist, 8, 41-44.
10.
Goldman, L. (1983). Reaction: Defining non-traditional research. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 87-89.
11.
Harmon, L. (1983). Scientific affairs: The next decade. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 31-37.
12.
Heinemann, A. , & Shontz, F. (1984). Adjustment following disability: Representative cases. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 28, 3-14.
13.
Kelly, G. (1955). A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
14.
Langer, S. K. (1967). Mind: An essay on human feeling (Vol. 1). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
Langer, S. K. (1972). Mind: An essay on human feeling (Vol. 2). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
Mages, N. L. , & Mendelsohn, G. A. (1979). Effects of cancer on patients' lives: A personological approach. In G. C. Stone, F. Cohen, & N. E. Adler (Eds.), Health psychology (pp. 255-284). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Manicas, P. , & Secord, P. (1983). Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science. American Psychologist, 38, 399-413.
18.
Neimeyer, G. , & Resnikoff, A. (1983). Qualitative strategies in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 75-85.
19.
Ogilvy, J. (1977). Many dimensional man: Decentralizing self, society, and the sacred. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Palmer, R. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
21.
Ricoeur, P. (1969). The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (D. Ihde, Ed.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
22.
Shontz, F. (1983). To study persons: Reactions to "Qualitative strategies in counseling research."The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 91-93.
23.
Stephenson, W. (1953). The study of behavior: Q-techniques and its methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Thoresen, C. (1980). Reflections on chronic health, self-control, and human ecology. The Counseling Psychologist, 8(4), 48-58.
