Bordin, E. S.Simplification as a strategy for research in psychotherapy . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 493-503.
2.
Bordin, E. S.Research strategies in psychotherapy. New York: Wiley, 1974.
3.
Bordin, E. S.The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance . Psychotherapy: theory, research, and practice, 1979, 16, 252-260.
4.
Doehrman, M. J.Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy . Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 1976, 40(1).
5.
Ekstein, R. , & Wallerstein, R. S.The teaching and learning of psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books, 1958.
6.
Forsyth, D. R. , & Ivey, A. E.Microtraining: An approach to differential supervision. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley, 1980, pp. 242-261.
7.
Gelso, C. J.Research in counseling: methodological and professional issues . The Counseling Psychologist, 1979, 8(3), 7-35.
8.
Hartley, D. E. Therapeutic alliance and success of brief individual therapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, 1978.
9.
Hess, A. K.Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley, 1980.
10.
Hester, L. R. , Weitz, L. J.Anchor, K. N., & Roback, H. B.Supervisor's attraction as a function of level of supervisor skillfulness and supervisee's perceived similarity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1976, 23, 254-258.
11.
Horwitz, L.Clinical prediction in psychotherapy. New York: Jason-Aronson, 1974.
12.
Kagan, N.Influencing human interaction-eighteen years with IPR. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley, 1980, pp. 262-286.
13.
Kell, B. L. , & Mueller, W.J. Impact and change. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966.
14.
Lambert, M. J.Research and the supervisory process. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley, 1980, pp. 423-352.
15.
Lehrke, S. A. Working alliance development early in psychotherapy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 1978.
16.
Luborsky, L. , Chandler, M., Auerbach, A., Cohen, J., & Bachrach, H.Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research. Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 75, 145-185.
17.
Luborsky, L.Helping alliances in psychotherapy. In J. L. Claghord (Ed.), Successful psychotherapy. New York: Brunner-Mazel, 1976.
18.
Mueller, W. J. , & Kell, B. J.Coping with conflict: Supervising counselors and psychotherapists. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
19.
Muslin, H. L. , Burstein, A. G., Gedo, J. E., & Sandow, L.Research on the supervisory process. 1. Supervisor's appraisal of the interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1967, 16, 427-431.
20.
Parloff, M.B. Can psychotherapy research guide the policy maker? A little knowledge may be a dangerous thing . American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 296-306.
21.
Rioch, M.J. The dilemma of supervision in dynamic psychotherapy. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Wiley, 1980, pp. 66-67.
22.
Ryan, E. R. The capacity of the patient to enter an elementary therapeutic relationship in the initial psychotherapy interview. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1973.
23.
Sarnat, J. E. A comparison of psychoanalytic and client centered measures of initial in-therapy patient participation. Un- published doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1975.
