Rogers, C.R.Interpersonal relations: U.S.A. 2000 . The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4, p. 269.
2.
Coulson, W.Inside a basic encounter group . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), p. 6.
3.
Gibb, J.R. & Gibb, L.M.Emergence therapy. The TORI process in an emergent group. In G.M. Gazda (Ed.) Innovations to group psychotherapy. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1968a. p. 121.
4.
Association of Counseling Service Directors Preliminary statement of group processes . 18th Annual Conference, 1969. p. 2.
5.
Egan, G.Encounter: Group processes for interpersonal growth. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1970.
6.
Naranjo, C.Contributions of Gestalt therapy. In H.A. Otto & J. Mann (Eds.) Ways of growth: Approaches to expanding human awareness. New York: Viking Press, 1968. p. 130.
7.
O'Banion, T. & O'Connell, A.The shared journey, an introduction to encounter. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970. p. 159.
8.
Schutz, W.C.Here comes everybody. New York: Harper and Row, 1971. p. 156.
9.
Egan, G.Encounter: Group processes for interpersonal growth. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1970.p.135.
10.
Corsini, R.J.Issues in encounter groups. Comments on Coulson's article . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2). p. 29.
11.
Hills, C. & Stone, R.B.Conduct your own awareness sessions. New York: Signet, 1970.
12.
Schutz, W.C.Here comes everybody. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
13.
Birnbaum, M.Sense about sensitivity training . Saturday Feview, November 15, 1969. p. 82.
14.
NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science . Standards for the use of laboratory method. Washington, D.C.: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1969. p. 11.
15.
Rarick, J.R.Sensitivity training . The Congressional Record, June 10, 1969. p. 15323.
16.
Ibid., p. 15323.
17.
Hills, C. & Stone, R.B.Conduct your own awareness sessions. New York: Signet, 1970.
18.
Rogers, C.Carl Rogers on encounter groups. New York: Harper and Row, 1970. p. 119.
19.
Gibb, J.R.The effects of human relations training. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971. p. 857.
20.
Ellis, A.The rational-emotive encounter group. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969, pp. 122-123.
21.
Bach, G.R.The marathon group: Intensive practice of intimate interaction. In R.W. Siroka, E.K. Siroka, & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971b. p. 135.
22.
Gibb, J.R.The effects of human relations training. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971. p. 857.
23.
Coulson, W.Inside a basic encounter group . The Counseling Psychologist1 970, 2 (2). p. 11.
24.
Argyris, C.On the future of laboratory education. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970b. p. 264.
25.
Ibid. p. 268.
26.
NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science . Standards for the use of laboratory method. Washington, D.C.: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1969. p. 6.
27.
Thomas, H.F.Encounter -The game of no game. In A. Burton Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. p.79.
28.
Gibb, J.R. & Gibb, L.M.Role freedom in a TORI group. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1969. p. 56.
29.
Ibid. p. 43.
30.
Coulson, W.Inside a basic encounter group . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), p. 9.
31.
Corsini, R.J.Issues in encounter groups. Comments on Coulson's article . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2). p. 30.
32.
Egan, G.Encounter: Group processes for interpersonal growth. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1970. pp. 51-60.
33.
Bindrim, P.A report on a nude marathon . Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 1968b, 5. p. 161.
34.
Ellis, A.The rational-emotive encounter group. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. p. 126.
35.
Schutz, W.C.Here comes everybody. New York: Harper and Row, 1971. p. 118.
36.
Ibid. p. 110.
37.
Gibb, J.R.The effects of human relations training. In A.E. Bergin & S.L. Garfield (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971. p. 855.
38.
Shepard, M. & Lee, M.Marathon 16. New York: Pocket Books, 1971. p. 166.
39.
Bach, G.R.The marathon group: Intensive practice of intimate interaction. In R.W. Siroka, E.K. Siroka, & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971b. p. 136.
40.
Lowen, A.Bio-energetic group therapy. In H.M. Ruitenbeck (Ed.) Group therapy today. New York: Atherton Press, 1969, p. 289.
41.
Argyris, C.Conditions for competence acquisition and therapy. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970a. p. 228.
42.
Bach, G.R.Marathon group dynamics: I. Some functions of the professional group facilitator. In R.W. Siroka, F.K. Siroka, & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971 a. p. 139.
43.
Stoller, F.H.Marathon group therapy. In G.M. Gazda (Ed.) Innovations to group psychotherapy. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1968. p. 92.
44.
Skousen, W.C.Chief, Watch out for those T-group promoters! In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970. p. 253.
45.
NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science . Standards for the use of laboratory method. Washington, D.C.: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1969. p. 5.
46.
Rogers, C.Carl Rogers on encounter groups. New York: Harper and Row, 1970. p. 50.
47.
Ibid. p. 58.
48.
Egan, G.Encounter: Group processes for interpersonal growth. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1970. p. 371.
49.
Burton, A. (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
50.
Verplanck, W.S.Trainers, trainees, and ethics . The Counseling Psychologist1970, 2 (2), 72.
51.
Corsini, R.J.Issues in encounter groups. Comments on Coulson's article . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), p. 32.
52.
Ibid. p. 33.
53.
Strassburger, F.Ethical guidelines for encounter groups . APA Monitor, 1971, 2(7), p. 3.
54.
Ibid. p. 32.
55.
NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science . Standards for the use of laboratory method. Washington, D.C.: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1969. p. 9.
56.
Ibid. p. 10.
57.
American Psychiatric AssociationTask force report 1: Encounter groups and psychiatry. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1970. p. 25.
58.
American Personnel and Guidance Association . Ethical Standards. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1961, 40, 206-209.
59.
American Psychiatric AssociationTask force report 1: Encounter groups and psychiatry. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1970.
60.
Argyris, C.Conditions for competence acquisition and therapy. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970a. pp. 220-245.
61.
Argyris, C.On the future of laboratory education. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970b. pp. 257-273.
62.
Association of Counseling Service Directors . Preliminary statement of group processes. 18th Annual Conference, 1969.
63.
Bach, G.R.Marathon group dynamics: 1. Some functions of the professional group facilitator. In R.W. Siroka, F.K. Siroka, & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971 a. pp. 200-204.
64.
Bach, G.R.The marathon group: Intensive practice of intimate interaction. In R.W. Siroka, F.K. Siroka, & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971b. pp. 132-140.
65.
Bennis, W.G.Patterns and vicissitudes in T-group development. In L.P. Bradford, J.R. Gibb, & K.D. Benne (Eds.) T-group theory and laboratory method. New York: Wiley, 1964. pp. 80-135.
66.
Bindrim, P.Facilitating peak experiences. In H.A. Otto and J. Mann (Eds.) Ways of growth: Approaches to expanding human awareness. New York: Viking Press, 1968a. pp. 115-127.
67.
Bindrim, P.A report on a nude marathon . Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 1968b, 5, 180-188.
68.
Bindrim, P.Nudity as a quick grab for intimacy in group therapy . Psychology Today, June, 1969, 25-28.
69.
Birnbaum, M.Sense about sensitivity training . Saturday Review, November 15, 1969, 82, 83, 96-98.
70.
Burton, A. (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
71.
Campbell, J.P. & Dunnette, M.D.Effectiveness of T-group experiences in managerial training and development. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 73-104.
Casriel, D.The dynamics of Synanon (IV). In R.W. Siroka, E.K. Siroka, & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter, New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971. pp. 84-94.
74.
Corsini, R.J.Immediate therapy in groups. In G.M. Gazda (Ed.) Innovations to group psychotherapy. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1968. pp. 15-41.
75.
Corsini, R.J.Issues in encounter groups. Comments on Coulson's article . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), 28-34.
76.
Coulson, W.Inside a basic encounter group . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), 1-27.
77.
Courtney, P.Beware sensitivity training. New Orleans: Free Men Speak, Inc., 1969.
78.
Drake, G.V.Sensitivity training - attack on Christian values and American culture. Tulsa: Christian Crusade Publications, 1969.
79.
Eddy, W.B. & Lubin, B.Laboratory training and encounter groups. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1971, 49, 625-635.
80.
Egan, G.Encounter: Group processes for interpersonal growth. Belmont, Cal.: Wadsworth, 1970.
81.
Ellis, A.The rational-emotive encounter group. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. pp. 112-127.
82.
Gazda, G.M. (Ed.) Innovations to group psychotherapy. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1968.
83.
Gazda, G.M. (Ed.) Special issue: Groups in guidance. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1971, 49, 589-684.
84.
Gazda, G.M. , Duncan, J.A. & Sisson, P.J.Professional issues in group work. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1971, 49, 637-643.
85.
Gendlin, E.T. & Beebe, J.Experiential groups. Instructions for groups. In G.M. Gazda (Ed.) Innovations to group psychotherapy. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1968. pp. 190-206.
86.
Gibb, J.R.The effects of human relations training. In A.E. Bergin and S.L. Garfield (Eds.) Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1971. pp. 839-862.
87.
Gibb, J.R. & Gibb, L.M.Role freedom in a TORI group. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. pp. 42-57.
88.
Golumbiewski, R.T. & Blumberg, A. (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970.
89.
Goodstein, L.D.Some issues involved in intensive group experiences . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), 50-55.
90.
The group: Joy on Thursday , Newsweek, May 12, 1969, 104-108.
91.
Hills, C. & Stone, R.B.Conduct your own awareness sessions. New York: Signet, 1970.
92.
House, R.J.T-group education and leadership effectiveness: A review of the empiric literature and a critical evaluation. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970. pp. 435-462.
93.
Howard, J.Please touch. New York: Dell, 1970.
94.
Kagan, N.Issues in encounter . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), 43-50.
95.
Lakin, M.Group sensitivity training and encounter . Uses and abuses of a method. The Counseling Psychologist, 1970a, 2 (2), 66-70.
96.
Lakin, M.Response to Coulson . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970b, 2(2), 34-38.
97.
Lippitt, G.L. & This, L.E.Leaders for laboratory training: Selected guidelines for group trainers utilizing the laboratory method. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. I tasca, III.: F. E. Peacock, 1970. pp. 167-179.
98.
Lowen, A.Bio-energetic group therapy. In H.M. Ruitenbeck (Ed.) Group therapy today. New York: Atherton Press, 1969. pp. 279-290.
99.
Luke, B. & Seashore, C.Generalizations on research and speculations from experience related to laboratory training design. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970. pp. 430-435.
100.
Maliver, B.L.Encounter groupers up against the wall . New York Times Magazine, Jan. 3, 1971, 4, 5+.
101.
Mann, J.Encounter. A weekend with intimate strangers. New York: Grossman, 1969.
102.
Maslow, A.H.Motivation and personality. New York: Harper, 1954.
103.
McGowan, J.F. & Schmidt, L.D.Counseling: Readings in theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1962.
104.
Mintz, E.E.Time-extended marathon groups. In R.W. Siroka, E.K. Siroka & G.A. Schloss (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971. pp. 140-149.
105.
Moustakas, C.Individuality and encounter. Cambridge, Mass.: Howard A. Doyle, 1968.
106.
Naranjo, C.Contributions of Gestalt therapy. In H.A. Otto & J. Mann (Eds.) Ways of growth: Approaches to expanding human awareness. New York: Viking Press, 1968. pp. 128-146.
107.
NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science . Standards for the use of laboratory method. Washington, D.C.: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science, 1969.
108.
O'Banion, T. & O'Connell, A.The shared journey, an introduction to encounter. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
109.
Odiorne, G.S.The trouble with sensitivity training. In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970. pp. 273-287.
110.
OhIsen, M.M.Reaction to Coulson's paper . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2),-38-42.
111.
Olch, D. & Snow, D.L.Personality characteristics of sensitivity group volunteers. The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1970, 48, 848-850.
112.
Otto, H.A. & Mann, J. (Eds.) Ways of growth: Approaches to expanding human awareness. New York: Viking Press, 1968.
113.
Rarick, J.R.Sensitivity training . The Congressional Record, June 10, 1969, 15322-15335.
114.
Rogers, C.R.Interpersonal relations: U.S.A. 2000 . The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968, 4, 265-280.
115.
Rogers, C.R.The group comes of age . Psychology Today, 1969, 3(7), 27-31, 58-61.
116.
Rogers, C.Carl Rogers on encounter groups. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
117.
Ruitenbeck, H.M. (Ed.) Group therapy today. New York: Atherton Press, 1969.
118.
Ruitenbeck, H.M.The new group therapies. New York: Avon, 1970.
119.
Schutz, W.C.Joy: Expanding human awareness. New York: Grove Press, 1967.
120.
Schutz, W.C.Here comes everybody. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
121.
Seashore, C.What is sensitivity training? In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F .E. Peacock, 1970, pp. 14-17.
122.
Shelly, J.A. & Bassin, A.Daytop lodge - A new treatment approach for drug addicts. Corrective Psychiatry and Journal of Social Therapy, 1965, 1 1,186-195.
123.
Shepard, M. & Lee, M.Marathon 16. New York: Pocket Books, 1971.
124.
Shostrom, E.L.Group therapy: Let the buyer beware . Psychology Today, May, 1969, 36-40.
125.
Siroka, R.W. , Siroka, E.K. & Schloss, G.A. (Eds.) Sensitivity training and group encounter. New York: Grossett & Dunlap, 1971.
126.
Skousen, W.C.Chief, Watch out for those T-group promoters! In R.T. Golumbiewski & A. Blumberg (Eds.) Sensitivity training and the laboratory approach. Itasca, III.: F.E. Peacock, 1970. pp. 252-256.
127.
Solomon, L.N. & Berzon, B.The self-directed group: A new direction in personal growth learning. In J.T. Hart & T.M. Tomlinson (Eds.) New directions in client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970. pp. 314-347.
128.
Stoller, F.H.Marathon group therapy. In G.M. Gazda (Ed.) Innovations to group psychotherapy. Springfield, III.: Charles C. Thomas, 1968. pp. 42-95.
129.
Stoller, F.H.A stage for trust. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. pp. 81-96.
130.
Strassburger, F.Ethical guidelines for encounter groups . APA Monitor, 1971, 2(7), 3, 34.
131.
Thomas, H.F.Encounter -The game of no game. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. pp. 69-80.
132.
Verplanck, W.S.Trainers, trainees, and ethics . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), 71-75.
133.
Warkentin, J.Intensity in group encounter. In A. Burton (Ed.) Encounter: Theory and practice of encounter groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969. pp. 162-170.
134.
Whiteley, J.M.Introduction . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), i-ii.
135.
Whiteley, J.M.Editorial . The Counseling Psychologist, 1970, 2(2), 62-65.
136.
Yalom, I.D. & Lieberman, M.A.A study of encounter group casualties. Archives of General Psychiatry, July, 1971, 25, 16-30.
137.
Zweben, J.E. & Hamman, K.Prescribed games: A theoretical perspective on the use of group techniques. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1970, 7(1), 22-27.