Despite its widespread therapeutic use, the evaluation of self-compassion remains controversial. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) was proposed with three components on a bipolar continuum, ranging from compassionate self-responding (CS), including self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness, to uncompassionate self-responding (UCS), including self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification. However, recent evidence conflicts with this 6-factor structure, particularly when considering cultural differences. We tested the cultural validity of the SCS in a South Korean sample by comparing 12 models of different factor structures using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). The results support a 4-factor ESEM model (three CS factors and one UCS factor; all items were negatively valenced), consistent with previous findings in Northeast Asian populations. Incremental and criterion validity were confirmed. These findings suggest that the operationalization of self-compassion and its measurement should be culturally contextualized.
AlamerA. (2022). Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor ESEM for construct validation purposes: Guidelines and applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100005
2.
ArchJ. J.BrownK. W.DeanD. J.LandyL. N.BrownK. D.LaudenslagerM. L. (2014). Self-compassion training modulates alpha-amylase, heart rate variability, and subjective responses to social evaluative threat in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 42, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.12.018
3.
ArimitsuK. (2023). Self-compassion across cultures. In Finlay-JonesA.BluthK.NeffK. (Eds.), Handbook of self-compassion (pp. 129–141). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22348-8_8
BaeM. (2008). The effect of adolescents’ self-differentiation on self-control, depression, anxiety, and a problem of interpersonal relation [Master’s thesis, Kyungnam University].
6.
BandalosD. L. (2014). Relative performance of categorical diagonally weighted least squares and robust maximum likelihood estimation. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.859510
7.
BoucherH. C. (2010). Understanding Western‐East Asian differences and similarities in self‐enhancement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00266.x
8.
BrennerR. E.HeathP. J.VogelD. L.CredéM. (2017). Two is more valid than one: Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(6), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000211
9.
CastilhoP.Pinto-GouveiaJ.DuarteJ. (2015). Evaluating the multifactor structure of the long and short versions of the Self-Compassion Scale in a clinical sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 71(9), 856–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22187
10.
ChioF. H. N.MakW. W. S.YuB. C. L. (2021). Meta-analytic review on the differential effects of self-compassion components on well-being and psychological distress: The moderating role of dialecticism on self-compassion. Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 101986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101986
11.
ChoK.KimH. (2023). Relationship between self-compassion and quality of life and the mediating effect of friendship and compassion for others -in early- adulthood undergraduate students. Journal of Future Society, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/m5gv.
12.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
13.
DerogatisL. R. (2001). Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18. NCS Pearson.
14.
EwertC.GaubeB.GeislerF. C. M. (2018). Dispositional self-compassion impacts immediate and delayed reactions to social evaluation. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.037
15.
FinneyS. J.DiStefanoC. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR. O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.
16.
GilbertP. (2019). Psychotherapy for the 21st century: An integrative, evolutionary, contextual, biopsychosocial approach. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 92(2), 164–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12226
17.
GuH.WenZ.HauK.-T. (2023). Bifactor exploratory structural equation models versus traditional approaches in predicting external criteria. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(5), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2023.2165496
18.
HalamováJ.KanovskýM.PetrocchiN.MoreiraH.LópezA.BarnettM. D.YangE.BendaJ.BrählerE.ZengX.ZengerM. (2021). Factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 11 international samples. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 54(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/grjxjx.
19.
HayesJ. A.LockardA. J.JanisR. A.LockeB. D. (2016). Construct validity of the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form among psychotherapy clients. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 29(4), 405–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2016.1138397
20.
HendriksT.WarrenM. A.Schotanus-DijkstraM.HassankhanA.GraafsmaT.BohlmeijerE.de JongJ. (2019). How WEIRD are positive psychology interventions? A bibliometric analysis of randomized controlled trials on the science of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1484941
21.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd Edition). Sage Publications.
22.
HuL.-t.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
JoengJ. R. (2017). The mediating effects of self-compassion and empathy on the relationship between fear of self-compassion and burnout in counselors. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 38(1), 1–16.
24.
JungS.KimE. (2023). Development and initial validation of the Multidimensional Empathy Scale for Adolescents. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12573
25.
KangJ.JangJ. (2017). The effectiveness of a Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) group program: A study on self-critical university students. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 29(2), 335–356. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2017.05.29.2.335
26.
KarlJ. A.PradoS. M. M.GračaninA.VerhaeghenP.RamosA.MandalS. P.MichalakJ.ZhangC.-Q.SchmidtC.SchmidtU. S.DruciaE.SolemS.AstaniA.LiuX.LucianoJ. V.TkalčićM.LiljaJ. L.DundasI.WongS. Y. S.Fischer, R. (2020). The cross-cultural validity of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire across 16 countries. Mindfulness, 11, 1226–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01333-6
27.
KimY.ChangM. (2016). The effect of self-compassion writing on rumination, and emotional regulation among university students with depressive tendency. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 21(2), 299–316.
28.
KimA.-k.HaS.-S. (2020). Impact of covert narcissism on depression: The moderated mediation effect of internalized shame and self-compassion. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 25(6), 1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2020.25.6.007
29.
KimJ.JinM. (2014). The mediating effects of perfectionism on the relationships between covert narcissism and the interpersonal problems of university students. Asian Journal of Child Welfare and Development, 12(3), 1–16.
KimK.YiG.ChoY.ChaiS.LeeW. (2008). The validation study of the Korean version of the Self-Compassion Scale. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 13(4), 1023–1044. https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2008.13.4.012
32.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R.MatsumotoH.NorasakkunkitV. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245–1267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1245
33.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (6th ed.). Guilford Publications.
34.
LathrenC. R.RaoS. S.ParkJ.BluthK. (2021). Self-compassion and current close interpersonal relationships: A scoping literature review. Mindfulness, 12(5), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01566-5
35.
LauriolaM.DonatiM. A.TrentiniC.TomaiM.PontoneS.BakerR. (2021). The structure of the Emotional Processing Scale (EPS-25). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(6), 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000632
36.
LeungS. O.XuM. L. (2013). Single-item measures for subjective academic performance, self-esteem, and socioeconomic status. Journal of Social Service Research, 39(4), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2013.794757
37.
LiC.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
38.
LongP.NeffK. D. (2018). Self-compassion is associated with reduced self-presentation concerns and increased student communication behavior. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.09.003
39.
LópezA.SandermanR.SchroeversM. J. (2018). A close examination of the relationship between self-compassion and depressive symptoms. Mindfulness, 9(5), 1470–1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0891-6
40.
MaiY.ZhangZ.WenZ. (2018). Comparing exploratory structural equation modeling and existing approaches for multiple regression with latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(5), 737–749. https://doi.org/gc7qsz.
41.
MarshH. W.FraserM. I.RakhimovA.CiarrochiJ.GuoJ. (2023). The bifactor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale: Bayesian approaches to overcome exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) limitations. Psychological Assessment, 35(8), 674–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001247
42.
MarshH. W.GuoJ.DickeT.ParkerP. D.CravenR. G. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and set-ESEM: Optimal balance between goodness of fit and parsimony. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 55(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1602503
43.
MarshH. W.HauK.-T.GraysonD. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In Maydeu-OlivaresA.McArdleJ. J. (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.WenZ. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
45.
MarshH. W.LiemG. A. D.MartinA. J.MorinA. J. S.NagengastB. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406657
46.
MarshH. W.MorinA. J. S.ParkerP. D.KaurG. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
47.
MinkovM.DuttP.SchachnerM.MoralesO.SanchezC.JandosovaJ.KhassenbekovY.MuddB. (2017). A revision of Hofstede’s individualism-collectivism dimension: A new national index from a 56-country study. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 24(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-11-2016-0197
48.
Montero-MarinJ.KuykenW.CraneC.GuJ.BaerR.Al-AwamlehA. A.AkutsuS.Araya-VélizC.GhorbaniN.ChenZ. J.KimM.-S.MantziosM.Rolim dos SantosD. N.Serramo LópezL. C.TelebA. A.WatsonP. J.YamaguchiA.YangE.García-CampayoJ. (2018). Self-compassion and cultural values: A cross-cultural study of self-compassion using a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) analytical procedure. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02638
49.
MorinA. J. S. (2023). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (2nd ed, pp. 503–524). Guilford Press.
50.
MorinA. J. S.MarshH. W.NagengastB. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In HancockG. R.MuellerR.O. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). IAP Information Age Publishing.
51.
MurisP.PetrocchiN. (2017). Protection or vulnerability? A meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(2), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2005
52.
MurisP.van den BroekM.OtgaarH.OudenhovenI.LennartzJ. (2018). Good and bad sides of self-compassion: A face validity check of the Self-Compassion Scale and an investigation of its relations to coping and emotional symptoms in non-clinical adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(8), 2411–2421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1099-z
NeffK. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
55.
NeffK. D. (2009). Self-compassion. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of Individual Differences in Social Behavior (pp. 561–573). Guilford Press.
NeffK. D. (2016). The self-compassion scale is a valid and theoretically coherent measure of self-compassion. Mindfulness, 7, 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0479-3
58.
NeffK. D. (2022). The differential effects fallacy in the study of self-compassion: Misunderstanding the nature of bipolar continuums. Mindfulness, 13(3), 572–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01832-8
59.
NeffK. D. (2023). Self-compassion: Theory, method, research, and intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 193–218. https://doi.org/gq9m7r.
60.
NeffK. D.KnoxM. C.LongP.GregoryK. (2020). Caring for others without losing yourself: An adaptation of the mindful self-compassion program for healthcare communities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 76(9), 1543–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23007
61.
NeffK. D.Tóth-KirályI.YarnellL. M.ArimitsuK.CastilhoP.GhorbaniN.GuoH. X.HirschJ. K.HupfeldJ.HutzC. S.KotsouI.LeeW. K.Montero-MarinJ.SiroisF. M.de SouzaL. K.SvendsenJ. L.WilkinsonR. B.MantziosM. (2019). Examining the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale in 20 diverse samples: Support for use of a total score and six subscale scores. Psychological Assessment, 31(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000629
62.
NeffK. D.VonkR. (2009). Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: Two different ways of relating to oneself. Journal of Personality, 77(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/btjzth.
63.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
64.
ParkH.KimE.ShinH. (2020). Examining factor structure of the Korean version of the Self-Compassion Scale: Distinctive effect of self-compassion and self-coldness. Korean Journal of Counseling, 21(3), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.21.3.202006.227
65.
ParkK.WooS.ChangM. (2012). Validational study of Brief Symptoms Inventory-18 (BSI-18) in college students. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology,31(2), 507–521. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2012.31.2.006
66.
ParkS.KimK. (2013). The relationship among perceived stress, bullying and depression of solders: Moderating effects of self compassion. Korean Journal of Counseling, 14(6), 3691–3707. https://doi.org/10.15703/kjc.14.6.201312.3691
PetrocchiN.OttavianiC.CouyoumdjianA. (2014). Dimensionality of self-compassion: Translation and construct validation of the self-compassion scale in an Italian sample. Journal of Mental Health, 23(2), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2013.841869
69.
RakhimovA.RealoA.TangN. K. Y. (2022). The self-compassion scale: Validation and psychometric properties within the exploratory structural equation modeling framework. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/grk6nm.
70.
RobinsR. W.HendinH. M.TrzesniewskiK. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201272002
71.
ShinL. J.LayousK.ChoiI.NaS.LyubomirskyS. (2020). Good for self or good for others? The well-being benefits of kindness in two cultures depend on how the kindness is framed. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1651894
72.
ShinN. Y. (2018). The factor structure of the Korean Self-Compassion Scale (K-SCS): A study of university students. Journal of Human Understanding and Counseling, 39(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.30593/JHUC.39.2.4
73.
SingelisT. M.TriandisH. C.BhawukD. P. S.GelfandM. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302
74.
SoldzS.BudmanS.DembyA.MerryJ. (1995). A short form of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex scales. Assessment, 2(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191195002001006
75.
StraussC.Lever TaylorB.GuJ.KuykenW.BaerR.JonesF.CavanaghK. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004
76.
TriandisH. C.GelfandM. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118
77.
WangH.LouX. (2022). A meta-analysis on the social relationship outcome of being compassionate towards oneself: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 184, 111162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111162
78.
WernerK. H.JazaieriH.GoldinP. R.ZivM.HeimbergR. G.GrossJ. J. (2012). Self-compassion and social anxiety disorder. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 25(5), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.608842
79.
WhiteK.LehmanD. R. (2005). Culture and social comparison seeking: The role of self-motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271326
80.
WilliamsM. J.DalgleishT.KarlA.KuykenW. (2014). Examining the factor structures of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire and the Self-Compassion Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035566
81.
ZengX.WeiJ.OeiT. P. S.LiuX. (2016). The Self-Compassion Scale is not validated in a Buddhist sample. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(6), 1996–2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0205-z
82.
ZhangY. B.LinM.-C.NonakaA.BeomK. (2005). Harmony, hierarchy and conservatism: A cross-cultural comparison of Confucian values in China, Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Communication Research Reports, 22(2), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036810500130539
83.
ZhaoM.FordT.SmithsonJ.WangP.KarlA. (2023). Self-compassion in Chinese young adults: Its measurement and measurement construct. Assessment, 30(7), 2074–2089. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221137540
84.
ZhaoM.SmithsonJ.FordT.WangP.WongN. Y. B.KarlA. (2021). Self-compassion in Chinese young adults: Specific features of the construct from a cultural perspective. Mindfulness, 12, 2718–2728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01734-1
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
