Using data from 473 first-generation college students (FGCS) in engineering, the study tested a social cognitive career theory (SCCT) model of persistence and examines model invariance by participation in college science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs. Data from two survey waves collected 1 year apart were analyzed with structural equation modeling. Results supported a temporal pathway from engineering self-efficacy to lower negative outcome expectations and a cross-sectional link between persistence intention goals and observed persistence behaviors. The hypothesized temporal effect of negative outcome expectations on persistence goals was not supported. Multigroup analyses indicated that FGCS who participated in STEM support programs required lower levels of persistence intentions to persist compared with nonparticipants, suggesting such programs reduce the threshold needed to translate intentions into behavior. Findings underscore the role of self-efficacy in shaping expectations over time and highlight STEM support programs as scalable levers to promote FGCS persistence in engineering.
AzurM. J.StuartE. A.FrangakisC.LeafP. J. (2011). Multiple imputation by chained equations: What is it and how does it work?International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.329
3.
BandaR. M.FlowersA. M.III (2017). Birds of a feather do not always flock together: A critical analysis of Latina engineers and their involvement in student organizations. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education,16(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192716662966
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
5.
BettencourtG. M.ManlyC. A.KimballE.WellsR. S. (2020). STEM degree completion and first-generation college students: A cumulative disadvantage approach to the outcomes gap. The Review of Higher Education,43(3), 753–779. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2020.0006
6.
BrownT. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
7.
Byars-WinstonA.EstradaY.HowardC.DavisD.ZalapaJ. (2010). Influence of social cognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science and engineering: A multiple-groups analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology,57(2), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018608
8.
CanningE. A.LaCosseJ.KroeperK. M.MurphyM. C. (2020). Feeling like an imposter: The effect of perceived classroom competition on the daily psychological experiences of first-generation college students. Social Psychological and Personality Science,11(5), 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619882032
9.
ChenF.BollenK. A.PaxtonP.CurranP. J.KirbyJ. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods & Research,29(4), 468–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101029004003
10.
ChenX.SoldnerM. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields (NCES 2014-001). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014001rev.pdf
ColeD. A.MaxwellS. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.112.4.558
13.
DeRosaE.DolbyN. (2014). “I don’t think the university knows me.”: Institutional culture and lower-income, first-generation college students. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies,10(2). https://doi.org/10.5070/D4102019237
14.
FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.LeeB. H.HuX.DiazD.MartinezL. D. (2021). Social cognitive predictors of Latiné and White engineering students’ academic satisfaction and persistence intentions: Exploring intersections among social identities and institutional context. Journal of Vocational Behavior,127, 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103580
15.
FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.LeeH. S.AddaeD. A.GonzalezR.LunaL. L.JacquezR.CooperS.MitchellM. (2014). Academic satisfaction among Latino/a and White men and women engineering students. Journal of Counseling Psychology,61(1), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034577
16.
FouadN. A.Byars-WinstonA. M. (2005). Cultural context of career choice: Meta-analysis of race/ethnicity differences. The Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2005.tb00992.x
GarriottP. O.FloresL. Y.MartensM. P. (2013). Predicting the math/science career goals of low-income prospective first-generation college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(2), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032074
19.
GarriottP. O.HudymaA.KeeneC.SantiagoD. (2015). Social cognitive predictors of first- and non-first-generation college students’ academic and life satisfaction. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000066
20.
GarriottP. O.NavarroR. L.FloresL. Y. (2017). First-generation college students’ persistence intentions in engineering majors. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716657533
21.
GarriottP. O.NisleS. (2018). Stress, coping, and perceived academic goal progress in first-generation college students: The role of institutional supports. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 11(4), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000068
22.
GibbonsM. M.BordersL. D. (2010). Prospective first-generation college students: A social-cognitive perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 58(3), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00186.x
23.
GibbonsM. M.RhinehartA.HardinE. (2019). How first-generation college students adjust to college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(4), 488–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116682035
24.
HausmannL. R.SchofieldJ. W.WoodsR. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education,48(7),803–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9052-9
25.
HowardW. J.RhemtullaM.LittleT. D. (2015) Using principal components as auxiliary variables in missing data estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research,50(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.999267
26.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
27.
KimY. K.SaxL. J. (2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education,50, 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x
28.
KolbeL.JorgensenT. D. (2019). Using restricted factor analysis to select anchor items and detect differential item functioning. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1151-3
29.
KolbeL.JorgensenT. D.MolenaarD. (2021). The impact of unmodeled heteroskedasticity on assessing measurement invariance in single-group models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 28(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1766357
30.
KolenikovS.BollenK. A. (2012). Testing negative error variances: Is a Heywood case a symptom of misspecification?Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 124–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112442138
31.
LangK. M.CurtisJ.BotntempoD. E. (2017). PCAux Field Guide. Why Git Hub?.
32.
LeeH. S.FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.SuhH. N. (2018). Development and validation of the negative outcome expectations scale in engineering (NOES-E). Journal of Career Assessment,26(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679923
33.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior,45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
34.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology,47(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.47.1.36
35.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.SchmidtJ.BrennerB. R.LyonsH.TreistmanD. (2003). Relation of contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive models. Journal of Counseling Psychology,50(4),458–465. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.4.458
36.
LentR. W.MillerM. J.SmithP. E.WatfordB. A.LimH. M.HuiK.MorrisonM. A.WilkinsG.WilliamsK. (2013). Social cognitive predictors of adjustment to engineering majors across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior,83(1),22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.006
37.
LentR. W.MillerM. J.SmithP. E.WatfordB. A.LimR. H.HuiK. (2016). Social cognitive predictors of academic persistence and performance in engineering: Applicability across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.012
38.
LentR. W.SheuH.-B.MillerM. J.CusickM. E.PennL. T.TruongN. N. (2018). Predictors of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics choice options: A meta-analytic path analysis of the social-cognitive choice model by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000243
39.
LentR. W.SingleyD.SheuH.-B.GainorK. A.BrennerB. R.TreistmanD.AdesL. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of domain and life satisfaction: Exploring the theoretical precursors of subjective well-being. Journal of Counseling Psychology,52(3) 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.429
40.
LiC. H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
41.
LittleR. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association,83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157
42.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling,9(2), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
43.
LohfinkM. M.PaulsenM. B. (2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first-generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Development,46(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0040
44.
MaP. W.SheaM. (2021). First-generation college students’ perceived barriers and career outcome expectations: Exploring contextual and cognitive factors. Journal of Career Development, 48(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319827650
45.
MartinJ. P.SteflS. K.CainL. W.PfirmanA. L. (2020). Understanding first-generation undergraduate engineering students’ entry and persistence through social capital theory. International Journal of STEM Education,7(37). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00237-0
46.
MaslowskyJ.JagerJ.HemkenD. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development,39(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025414552301
47.
MaxwellS. E.ColeD. A.MitchellM. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606716
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2023). Advancing antiracism, diversity, equity, and inclusion in STEMM organizations: Beyond broadening participation. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/26803
NavarroR. L.FloresL. Y.LeeH. S.GonzalezR. (2014). Testing a longitudinal social cognitive model of intended persistence with engineering students across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior,85(1),146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.007
55.
NixS.RobertsK. L.HughesR. M. (2017). Female undergraduate STEM persistence: A focus on the role of living and learning communities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22(4), 349–374. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2016016349
PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
58.
PearsonJ.GiacumoL. A.FaridA.SadeghM. (2022). A systematic multiple studies review of low-income, first-generation, and underrepresented, STEM-degree support programs: Emerging evidence-based models and recommendations. Educational Science,12(5), 333. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050333
59.
PituchK. A.StevensJ. (2016). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences: Analyses with SAS and IBM’s SPSS. Routledge.
ReveloR. A.BaberL. D. (2018). Engineering resistors: Engineering Latina/o students and emerging resistant capital. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education,17(3) 249–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717719132
62.
RiscoC. M.O’BrienK. M.GrivelM. M.CastroJ. E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the correlates of educational and vocational goals for Latina/o students. Journal of Career Assessment,27(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072717723091
63.
RoseR. A.FraserM. W. (2008). A simplified framework for using multiple imputation in social work research. Social Work Research, 32(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/32.3.171
SatorraA.BentlerP. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika,75(2), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
66.
SavaleiV. (2014). Understanding robust corrections in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824793
67.
SmithJ. M.LucenaJ. C. (2016). Invisible innovators: How low-income, first-generation students use their funds of knowledge to belong in engineering. Engineering Studies,8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2016.1155593
68.
SyedM.ZurbriggenE. L.ChemersM. M.GozaB. K.BearmanS.CrosbyF. J.ShawJ. M.HunterL.MorganE. M. (2018). The role of self‐efficacy and identity in mediating the effects of STEM support experiences. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP),9(1), 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12170
69.
SzelényiK.DensonN.InkelasK. K. (2013). Women in STEM majors and professional outcome expectations: The role of living-learning programs and other college environments. Research in Higher Education,54(8) 851–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9299-2
70.
TateK. A.CapertonW.KaiserD.PruittN. T.WhiteH.HallE. (2015). An exploration of first-generation college students’ career development beliefs and experiences. Journal of Career Development, 42(4), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845314565025
ThompsonM. E. (2021). Grade expectations: The role of first-year grades in predicting the pursuit of STEM majors for first-and continuing-generation students. The Journal of Higher Education,92(6), 961–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1907169
73.
ToutkoushianR. K.StollbergR. A.SlatonK. A. (2018). Talking 'bout my generation: Defining “first-generation college students” in higher education research. Teachers College Record,120(4), Article n4. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000407
74.
VerdínD.GodwinA. (2018). Exploring Latina first-generation college students’ multiple identities, self-efficacy, and institutional integration to inform achievement in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 24(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2018018667
