A-Methodological Saturation: A Grounded Theory Analysis

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to develop an abstracted theoretical model concerning how counseling and counselor education researchers utilize saturation in their qualitative research. Given the importance of rigor and trustworthiness in qualitative research, this study addresses saturation, a method for ensuring methodological rigor and trustworthiness. The qualitative study included 23 participants from a range of social locations, methodological expertise, and research agendas. The findings from this qualitative study were analyzed and presented using Straussian grounded theory and resulted in the development of an abstracted theoretical model, which included the following: causal conditions, contextual factors, intervening conditions, actions, consequences, and a core category. The abstracted theoretical model can aid researchers in the process and practice of saturation. Advances in saturation can support the development of rigorous qualitative research design and methodological integrity. Discussion and implications are discussed across the areas of practice, education, advocacy, and research.

Keywords

rigor methodological integrity trustworthiness qualitative methodology qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldiabat

K. M.

Le Navenec

(2018). Data saturation: The mysterious step in grounded theory methodology. Qualitative Report, 23(1), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.2994

Arczynski

A. V.

Christensen

M. C.

Hoover

S. M.

(2018). Fostering critical feminist multicultural qualitative research mentoring. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(8), 954–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018823782

Bowen

G. A.

(2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107085301

Braun

Clarke

(2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

Caelli

Ray

Mill

(2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200201

Charmaz

(2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.),The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Sage Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-07735-000

Charmaz

Henwood

(2017). Grounded theory methods for qualitative psychology. In Willig

I. C.

Rogers

W. S.

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 238–256). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555.n14

Conlon

Timonen

Elliott-O’Dare

O’Keeffe

Foley

(2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research, 30(6), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139

Corbin

Strauss

(2015). Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications.

10.

Francis

J. J.

Johnston

Robertson

Glidewell

Entwistle

Eccles

M. P.

Grimshaw

J. M.

(2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology & Health, 25(10), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015

11.

Flynn

S. V.

Korcuska

J. S.

(2018). Grounded theory research design: An investigation into practices and procedures. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849

12.

Flynn

S. V.

Korcuska

J. S.

Brady

N. V.

Hays

D. G.

(2019). A 15‐Year content analysis of three qualitative research traditions. Counselor Education and Supervision, 58(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12123

13.

Fusch

Ness

(2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2015.2281

14.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

(1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter.

15.

Guest

Bunce

Johnson

(2006). How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

16.

Hays

D. G.

Crockett

S. A.

Michel

(2021). A grounded theory of counselor educators' academic leadership development. Counselor Education and Supervision, 60(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12196

17.

Hays

D. G.

Singh

A. A.

(2023). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings (2nd ed.). Cognella.

18.

Hays

D. G.

Wood

Dahl

Kirk-Jenkins

(2016). Methodological rigor in Journal of Counseling & Development qualitative research articles: A 15-year review. Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12074

19.

Hennink

M. M.

Kaiser

B. N.

Marconi

V. C.

(2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

20.

Johnson

J. L.

Adkins

Chauvin

(2020). A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84(1), 7120–7146. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7120

21.

Killian

Peters

H. C.

Floren

(2023). Development and validation of the multicultural and social justice counseling competencies-inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2022.2160357

22.

King

J. H.

Stretch

L. S.

, (2013). A critical analysis of counseling’s professional identity crisis. Vistas Online, 8, 1–17. https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/vistas/a-critical-analysis-of-counseling-s-professional-identity-crisis.pdf?sfvrsn=30f7274c_10

23.

Kornbluh

(2015). Combatting challenges to establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1021941

24.

LaDonna

K. A.

Artino

A. R.

Jr. Balmer

D. F.

(2021). Beyond the guise of saturation: Rigor and qualitative interview data. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(5), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-21-00752.1

25.

Levitt

H. M

. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000184

26.

Levitt

H. M.

Bamberg

Creswell

J. W.

Frost

D. M.

Josselson

Suárez-Orozco

(2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. The American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

27.

Levitt

H. M.

Kannan

Ippolito

M. R.

(2013). Teaching qualitative methods using a research team approach: Publishing grounded theory projects with your class. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 10(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2011.586101

28.

Levitt

H. M.

Morrill

Collins

K. M.

Rizo

J. L.

(2021). The methodological integrity of critical qualitative research: Principles to support design and research review. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000523

29.

Levitt

H. M.

Motulsky

S. L.

Wertz

F. J.

Morrow

S. L.

Ponterotto

J. G.

(2017). Recommendations for designing and reviewing qualitative research in psychology: Promoting methodological integrity. Qualitative Psychology, 4(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000082

30.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

(1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Sage Publications.

31.

Lowe

Norris

A. C.

Farris

A. J.

Babbage

D. R.

(2018). Quantifying thematic saturation in qualitative data analysis. Field Methods, 30(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X17749386

32.

Malterud

Siersma

V. D.

Guassora

A. D.

(2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

33.

Mason

(2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1428/3027

34.

Morrow

S. L.

(2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250

35.

Morse

J. M.

(2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501

36.

Motulsky

S. L.

(2021). Is member checking the gold standard of quality in qualitative research? (2021). Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000215

37.

Nelson

(2017). Using conceptual depth criteria: Addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 17(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116679873

38.

O’Reilly

Parker

(2013). ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112446106

39.

Peters

H. C.

Das

Attia

Parker

M. M.

(2022). COVID‐19 and pre‐tenure counseling faculty: A collaborative autoethnographic investigation. Journal of Employment Counseling. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12200

40.

Peters

H. C.

Luke

(2022). Principles of anti‐oppression: A critical analytic synthesis. Counselor Education and Supervision, 61(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12251

41.

Peters

H. C.

Luke

Bernard

Trepal

(2020). Socially just and culturally responsive leadership within counseling and counseling psychology: A grounded theory investigation. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(7), 953–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000020937431

42.

Rawhani

(2023). Relational coding: Enhancing the transparency and trustworthiness of grounded theory research. Methodological Innovations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221144566

43.

Rieger

K. L.

(2019). Discriminating among grounded theory approaches. Nursing Inquiry, 26(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12261

44.

Saldaña

(2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

45.

Saunders

Sim

Kingstone

Baker

Waterfield

Bartlam

Burroughs

Jinks

(2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

46.

Shaw

R. M.

Howe

Beazer

Carr

(2020). Ethics and positionality in qualitative research with vulnerable and marginal groups. Qualitative Research, 20(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794119841839

47.

Smith

E. B.

Luke

M. M.

(2021). A call for radical reflexivity in counseling qualitative research. Counselor Education and Supervision, 60(2), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12201

48.

Smith

E. B.

Luke

M. M.

(2023). Re-engaging tensions within narrative threads: Ethical obligations, researcher identity, and methodological meaning making. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720537.2023.2170502

49.

Tracy

S. J.

(2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121