The heterosexism erasure construct captures attitudes, which deny or minimize the systemic oppression of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) persons in the United States. Heterosexism erasure expands the interrogation of denying or minimizing discrimination (Neville at al., 2006) beyond the realm of White supremacy and into the domain of heteronormativity. The purpose of this project was to develop a psychometrically sound measure of heterosexism erasure. Two independent samples were gathered to conduct exploratory (n = 425) and confirmatory (n = 367) factor analyses to assess for initial reliability and validity evidence of the Heterosexism Erasure Scale (HES). Results suggest that the final 13-item HES provides a general index of heterosexism erasure as well as assesses two related, but distinct factors named Heterosexism Denial and Heterosexism Minimization. Results support the internal consistency and factor structure of the measure. Expected relationships between the HES and existing measures provide validity evidence for the instrument.
AkramiN.EkehammarB.ClaessonM.SonnanderK. (2006). Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27(6), 605–617. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.07.003
2.
American Psychological Association Task Force on Psychological Practice with Sexual Minority Persons. (2021). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Sexual Minority Persons. American Psychological Association.
3.
BaileyC. W.ZahrenA. J. (2016). Post-homophobia comes out: The rise of Mormon polygamy in US popular culture. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 1(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1386/qsmpc.1.2.159_1
4.
BandermannK. M.SzymanskiD. M. (2014). Exploring coping mediators between heterosexist oppression and posttraumatic stress symptoms among lesbian, gay, and bisexual persons. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000044
5.
BarefootK. N.SmalleyK. B.WarrenJ. C. (2015). Psychological distress and perceived barriers to care for rural lesbians. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 19(4), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2015.1041629
6.
BensonP. L.VincentS. (1980). Development and validation of the sexist attitudes toward women scale (SATWS). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00962.x
7.
BoltD. (2005). From blindness to visual impairment: Terminological typology and the social model of disability. Disability & Society, 20(5), 539–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590500156246
8.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2015). The structure of racism in color-blind, “post-racial” America. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(1), 1358–1376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764215586826
10.
BrownfieldJ. M.FloresM. J.MorganS. K.AllenL. R.MarszalekJ. M. (2018). Development and psychometric properties of the Evasive Attitudes of Sexual Orientation Scale (EASOS). Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 5(1), 44–56https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000256
11.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
12.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(2), 261–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124104268644
13.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
14.
ChildD. (2006). The essentials of factor analysis. (3rd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.
15.
CioccaG.CapuanoN.TuziakB.MollaioliD.LimoncinE.ValsecchiD.CarosaE.GravinaG. L.GianfrilliD.LenziA.JanniniE. A. (2015). Italian validation of homophobia scale (HS). Sexual Medicine, 3(3), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sm2.68
16.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
17.
CortinaL. M.Kabat-FarrD.LeskinenE. A.HuertaM.MagleyV. J. (2013). Selective incivility as modern discrimination in organizations: Evidence and impact. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1579–1605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311418835
18.
DavisC. G.ThakeJ.WeekesJ. R. (2012). Impression managers: Nice guys or serious criminals?Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.11.001
19.
DeVellisR. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Sage.
20.
EkehammarB.AkramiN.GyljeM.ZakrissonI. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right‐wing authoritarianism?European Journal of Personality, 18(6), 463–482. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.526
21.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
22.
FiliceE.MeyerS. B. (2018). Patterns, predictors, and outcomes of mental health service utilization among lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals: A scoping review. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 22(2), 162–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2017.1418468
23.
Fredriksen-GoldsenK. I.KimH.-J.BarkanS. E.MuracoA.Hoy-EllisC. P. (2013). Health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults: Results from a population-based study. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1802–1809. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.301110
24.
GinicolaM. M.SmithC.FilmoreJ. M. (Eds.). (2017). Affirmative counseling with LGBTQI+ people. American Counseling Association.
25.
GreyJ. A.RobinsonB. E.ColemanE.BocktingW. O. (2013). A systematic review of instruments that measure attitudes toward homosexual men. Journal of Sex Research, 50(3–4), 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2012.746279
26.
HelmesE.HoldenR. R. (2003). The construct of social desirability: One or two dimensions?Personality and Individual Differences, 34(6), 1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00086-7
27.
HoytW. T.WarbasseR. E.ChuE. Y. (2006). Construct validation in counseling psychology research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 769–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287389
28.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
29.
HuffC.TingleyD. (2015). “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648
30.
KiteM. E.DeauxD. (1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0702_4
31.
LehavotK.SimoniJ. M. (2011). The impact of minority stress on mental health and substance use among sexual minority women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022839
32.
MorrisonM. A.MorrisonT. G. (2002). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v43n02_02
33.
MustanskiB.AndrewsR.PuckettJ. A. (2016). The effects of cumulative victimization on mental health among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adolescents and young adults. American Journal of Public Health, e1–e7. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302976
34.
NevilleH. A.LillyR. L.DuranG.LeeR. M.BrowneL. (2000). Construction and initial validation of the color-blind racial attitudes scale (CoBRAS). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.59
35.
NevilleH.SpaniermanL.DoanB.-T. (2006). Exploring the association between color-blind racial ideology and multicultural counseling competencies. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 12(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.12.2.275
36.
NygrenK. G.ÖhmanS.OlofssonA. (2015). Doing and undoing risk: The mutual constitution of risk and heteronormativity in contemporary society. Journal of Risk Research, 20(3), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1088056
37.
O’ConnorB. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807
PaulsC. A.CrostN. W. (2004). Effects of faking on self-deception and impression management scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.11.018
40.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
RobinsonJ. L.RubinL. J. (2016). Homonegative microaggressions and posttraumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 20(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2015.1066729
43.
RosenwasserP. (2000). Tool for transformation: Cooperative inquiry as a process for healing from internalized oppression. In TITLE AERC 2000: An International Conference. Proceedings of the Annual Adult Education Research Conference (41st, (pp. 392–401). Vancouver. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED452417.pdf#page=408
44.
SchlomerG. L.BaumanS.CardN. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082
45.
ShinR. Q.SmithL. C.VernayC. N.WelchJ. C.SharmaR.EberhardtM. (2020). Accessing counseling services where the rainbow doesn’t shine: A heterosexism audit study. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(13), 2246–2265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1734377
46.
ShinR. Q.SmithL. C.WelchJ. C.EzeoforI. (2016). Is Allison more likely than Lakisha to receive a callback from counseling professionals? A racism audit study. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(8), 1187–1211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000016668814
47.
SmithL. C.ShinR. Q. (2014). Queer blindfolding: A case study on difference “blindness” towards persons who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(7), 940–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2014.870846
48.
SmithL. C.ShinR. Q. (2015). Negotiating the intersection of racial oppression and heteronormativity. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(11), 1459–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2015.1073029
49.
SueD. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender and sexual orientation. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
50.
SyzmanskiD. M.Kashubeck-WestS.MeyerJ. (2008). Internalized heterosexism: A historical and theoretical overview. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(4), 510–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000007309488
51.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
52.
TebbeE. A.MoradiB.EgeE. (2014). Revised and abbreviated forms of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale: Tools for assessing anti-trans* prejudice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(4), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000043
53.
TraceyT. J. G. (2016). A note on socially desirable responding. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000135
54.
WallsN. E. (2008). Toward a multidimensional understanding of heterosexism: The changing nature of prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 55(1), 20–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918360802129287
55.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
