How to foster the integration of science (especially empirical research) and practice has been a vexing problem since the beginnings of counseling psychology and other applied fields. We propose that the basis for this problem is the very different, even contradictory, demands of empirical research and practice, and the resulting ways of being research scientists and practitioners. Focusing on psychotherapy, we posit seven such demands/pulls and ways of being and seven tactics for strengthening integration. Clinically relevant research on the therapeutic relationship and therapist skills/interventions conducted at the Maryland Psychotherapy Clinic and Research Lab is summarized. We emphasize that for science and practice to be mutually facilitative, the field will need to pay close and ongoing attention to ways of strengthening integration.
AnvariM.HillC. E.KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2020). Therapist skills associated with client emotional expression in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 30(7), 900–911. http://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1680901
2.
BartholomewT. T.Pérez-RojasA. E.LockardA. J.LockeB. D. (2017). “Research doesn’t fit into a 50-minute hour”: The phenomenology of therapists’ involvement in research at a university counseling center. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951570.2016.1275525
3.
BeltzA. M.WrightA. G. C.SpragueB. N.MolenaarP. C. M. (2016). Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment, 23(4), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116648209
4.
BermanM. I.ChapmanN.NashB.KivlighanD. M.Jr.PaquinJ. D. (2017). Sharing wisdom: Challenge, benefit, and developmental path to becoming a successful therapist-researcher. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2017.1293612
5.
CastonguayL. G.ConstantinoM. J.BeutlerL. E. (2019). Implementing evidence-based principles of therapeutic change: A bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers. In CastonguayL. G.ConstantinoM. J.BeutlerL. E. (Eds.), Principles of change: How psychotherapists implement research in practice (pp. 3–12). Oxford University.
6.
ConoleyC. W.ScheelM. L. (2018). Goal focused positive psychotherapy: A strength-based approach. Oxford University.
7.
CuttlerE.HillC. E.KingS.KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2019). Productive silence is golden: Predicting changes in client collaboration from process during silence and client attachment style in psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 56(4), 568–576. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000260
8.
DattilioF. M.EdwardsD. J. A.FishmanD. B. (2010). Case studies within a mixed-methods paradigm: Toward a resolution of alienation between researcher and practitioner in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021181
FlückigerC.Del ReA. C.WampoldB. E.HorvathA. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172
GelsoC. J. (1997). The making of a scientist in applied psychology: An attribute by treatment conception. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(2), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097252013
13.
GelsoC. J. (2005). The practice review. Psychotherapy, 42(1), 132.
14.
GelsoC. J. (2014). A tripartite model of the therapeutic relationship: Theory, research, and practice. Psychotherapy Research, 24(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.845920
15.
GelsoC. J. (2019). The therapeutic relationship in psychotherapy practice: An integrative perspective. Routledge.
16.
GelsoC. J.PalmaB. (2011). Directions for research on self-disclosure and immediacy: Moderation, mediation, and the inverted U. Psychotherapy, 48(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025909
17.
GelsoC. J.SavelaA. (in press). Applying theories to research: The interplay of theory and research in science. In LeongF.AustinJ. (Eds.), Psychology research handbook: A primer for graduate students and research assistants. (3rd ed.)
18.
GelsoC. J.WilliamsE. N.FretzB. R. (2014). Counseling Psychology (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
19.
GreenbergL. S.GoldmanR. N. (Eds.) (2019). Clinical handbook of emotion-focused therapy. American Psychological Association.
20.
HansonW. E.CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.PletskaK. S.CreswellJ. D. (2005). Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.224
21.
HillC. E. (2020). Helping skills: Facilitating exploration, insight, and action (5th ed.). American Psychological Association.
22.
HillC. E.BaumannE.ShafranN.GuptaS.MorrisonA.Péres-RojasA. E.SpanglerP. T.GriffinS.PappaL.GelsoC. J. (2015). Is training effective? A study of counseling trainees in a psychodynamic/interpersonal training clinic. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000053
23.
HillC. E.CarterJ. A.O’FarrellM. K. (1983). A case study of the process and outcome of time-limited counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30(1), 3–18. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.30.1.3
24.
HillC. E.GelsoC. J.ChuiH.SpanglerP. T.HummelA.HuangT.JacksonJ.JonesR. A.PalmaB.BhatiaA.GuptaS.AinS. C.KlingamanB.LimR. H.LiuJ.HuiK.JezziM. M.MilesJ. R. (2014). To be or not to be immediate with clients: The use and perceived effects of immediacy in psychodynamic/interpersonal psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 24(3), 299–315. http://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2013.812262
25.
HillC. E.HelmsJ. E.TichenorV.SpiegelS. B.O’GradyK. E.PerryE. S. (1988). The effects of therapist response modes in brief psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35(3), 222–233. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.35.3.222
26.
HillC. E.KlineK. V.O’ConnorS.MoralesK.LiX.KivlighanD. M.Jr.HillmanJ. (2019). Silence is golden: A mixed methods investigation of silence in one case of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 56(4), 577–587. http://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000196
27.
HillC. E.KnoxS. (2020). Consensual qualitative research: A guide for novice researchers. American Psychological Association.
28.
HillC. E.KnoxS.Pinto-CoelhoK. G. (2019). Self-disclosure and immediacy. In NorcrossJ. C.LambertM. J. (Eds.), Psychotherapy relationships that work (3rd ed., pp. 379-420). Oxford University Press.
29.
HillC. E.Lu.Y.GerstenblithJ. A.KlineK. V.WangR. J.LuYZhuX. (2020). Facilitating client collaboration and insight through interpretations and probes for insight in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A case study of one client with three successive therapists. Psychotherapy, 57(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000242
30.
KazdinA. E. (2008). Evidence-based treatment and practice: New opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. American Psychologist, 63(3), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146
31.
KivlighanD. M.Jr.HillC. E.GelsoC. J.BaumannE. (2016). Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000134
32.
KivlighanD. M.Jr.HillC. E.RossK.KlineK.FurhmannA.SauberE. (2019). Testing a mediation model of psychotherapy process and outcome in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Previous client distress, psychodynamic techniques, dyadic working alliance, and current client distress. Psychotherapy Research, 29(5), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2017.1420923
33.
KivlighanD. M.Jr.KlineK.GelsoC. J.HillC. E. (2017). Congruence and discrepancy between working alliance and real relationship: Variance decomposition and response surface analyses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000216
34.
LambertM. J. (1992). Implications of outcome research for psychotherapy integration. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldsteinM. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 94–129). Basic Books.
35.
MarksE. C.HillC. E.KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2019). Secrets in psychotherapy: For better or worse. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 70–82. http://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000311
36.
MolenaarP. C. M.CampbellC. G. (2009). The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01619.x
37.
MoralesK.KeumB. T.KivlighanD. M.Jr.HillC. E.GelsoC. J. (2018). Therapist effects due to client racial/ethnic status when examining linear growth for client- and therapist-rated working alliance and real relationship. Psychotherapy, 55(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000135
38.
NorcrossJ. C.LambertM. J. (Eds.) (2019). Psychotherapy relationships that work. Vol. 1: Evidence-based therapist contributions (3rd ed.). Oxford.
39.
O’ConnorS.KivlighanD. M.Jr.HillC. E.GelsoC. J. (2019). Therapist–client agreement about their working alliance: Associations with attachment styles. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000303
40.
PaquinJ. (2017). Introduction to special issue on clinician-researchers: A career engaged in both therapy research and practice. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 30(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2017.1350141
41.
Pinto-CoelhoK. G.HillC. E.KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2016). Therapist self-disclosures in a psychodynamic clinic: A mixed-methods investigation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 29(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2015.1072496
42.
PrassM.EwellA.HillC. E.KivlighanD. M.Jr. (2021). Solicited and unsolicited advice-giving in psychotherapy: Is it advised?Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34(2), 253–274. http://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1723492
43.
RychlakJ. F. (1981). A philosophy of science for personality theory (2nd ed.) Houghton Mifflin.
44.
SchaubhutN. A.ThompsonR. C. (2009). MBTI Type tables international. CPP Inc.
45.
ScheelM. J.StabbS. D.CohnT. J.DuanC.SauerE. M. (2018). Counseling psychology model training program. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(1), 6–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000018755512
46.
ShafranN.KivlighanD. M.Jr.GelsoC. J.BhatiaA.HillC. E. (2017). Therapist immediacy: The association with working alliance, real relationship, session quality and time in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 27(6), 737–748. http://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2016.1158884
47.
SmithJ.NizzaI. (2021). The essentials of interpretive phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association.
48.
StollG.TrautweinU. (2017). Vocational interests as personality traits: Characteristics, development, and significance in educational and organizational environments. In J. Specht, Personal development across the lifespan (pp. 401–417). Elsevier.
49.
StrikerG.GoldfriedM. R. (2019). The gap between science and practice: A conversation. Psychotherapy, 56(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000220
50.
SullivanH. S. (1954). Basic concepts in the psychiatric interview. Pastoral Psychology, 5(48), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01564923
51.
TishbyO. E.WisemanH. E. (Eds.)(2018). Developing the therapeutic relationship: Integrating case studies, research and practice. APA.
52.
WampoldB. E.BaldwinS. A.HoltforthM. g.ImelZ. E. (2017). What characterizes effective therapists? In CastonguayL. G.HillC. E. (Eds), How and why are some therapists better than others?: Understanding therapist effects (pp.13–36). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000034-003
53.
YounS. J.XiaoH.McAleaveyA.A.ScofieldB. E.PedersenT. R.CastonguayL. G.HayesJ. A.LockeB. D. (2019). Assessing and investigating clinicians’ research interests: Lessons on expanding practices and data collection in a large practice research network. Psychotherapy, 56(1), 67–82. http://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000192
