This study explored how, and to what degree, clinical supervisors utilize and integrate strength-based and multicultural approaches. We conducted a qualitative investigation using a grounded theory paradigm and consensual qualitative research methodology and analysis. Participants included 14 licensed psychologists. We organized the data into four domains: (a) supervisory approaches, (b) multicultural content/integration of multicultural approaches, (c) strength-based content/integration of strength-based approaches, and (d) supervisor power and supervisee empowerment. Results suggested that participants were keenly aware of multiculturalism and multicultural competence, and infused these perspectives throughout their supervision. Supervisors as a group were less aware of the ways that they used strength-based approaches with their supervisees, although a subset of participants intentionally used strength-based interventions. Notably, some supervisors used multicultural and strength-based perspectives in an integrative fashion by recognizing that strengths vary depending on the cultural context. We discuss implications for supervision practice, advocacy, theory, and research.
American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for clinical supervision in health service psychology. American Psychologist, 70(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038112
AndersonK. M. (2018). Post-traumatic growth and resilience despite experiencing trauma and oppression. Journal of Family Social Work, 21(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2017.1402540
4.
ArcsynskiA. V.MorrowS. L. (2017). The complexities of power in feminist multicultural psychotherapy supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000179
5.
BernardJ. M.GoodyearR. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Pearson.
6.
BurkardA. W.JohnsonA. J.MadsonM. B.PruittN. T.Contreras-TadychD. A.KozlowskiJ. M.HessS. A.KnoxS. (2006). Supervisor cultural responsiveness and unresponsiveness in cross-cultural supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.288
7.
BurkardA. W.KnoxS.ClarkeR. D.PhelpsD. L.InmanA. G. (2014). Supervisors’ experience of providing difficult feedback in cross-ethnic/racial supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(3), 314–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012461157
8.
BurnesT. R.WoodJ. M.InmanJ. L.WeliksonG. A. (2013). An investigation of process variables in feminist group supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012442653
9.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.
10.
CoveyS. R. (2005). The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness. Running Press Miniature Editions.
11.
CharmazK. (2006). Grounded theory: Methods for the 21st century. Sage.
12.
De StefanoJ.HutmanH.GazzolaN. (2017). Putting on the face: A qualitative study of power dynamics in clinical supervision. The Clinical Supervisor, 36(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325223.2017.1295893
13.
EdwardsJ. K.YoungA.NikelsH. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of strength-based clinical practices: Finding common factors. Routledge.
14.
EllisM. V.BergerL.HanusA. E.AlayaE. E.SwordsB. A.SiemborM. (2014). Inadequate and harmful clinical supervision: Testing a revised framework and assessing occurrence. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 434–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013508656
15.
FalenderC. A.BurnesT. R.EllisM. V. (2013). Multicultural clinical supervision and benchmarks: Empirical support informing practice and supervisor training. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012438417
16.
FalenderC. A.ShafranskeE. P. (2017). Clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10806-000
17.
FredricksonB. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
GeorgesC. M.Tomlinson-ClarkeS. M. (2015). Integrating positive psychology into counseling psychology doctoral education. The Counseling Psychologist, 43, 752–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015584067
20.
HernándezP. (2008). The cultural context model of clinical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 2(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3918.2.1.10
21.
HillC. E. (Ed.). (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association.
22.
HillC. E.KnoxS.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
23.
HillC. E.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001
24.
HowardF. (2008). Managing stress or enhancing well-being? Positive psychology’s contributions to clinical supervision. Australian Psychologist, 43(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060801978647
25.
InmanA. G. (2006). Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 32(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01589.x
26.
Jones-SmithE. (2014). Strengths-based therapy: Connecting theory, practice, and skills. Sage.
LeeA.KhawajaN. G. (2013). Multicultural training experiences as predictors of psychology students’ cultural competence. Australian Psychologist, 48(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9544.2011.00063.x
29.
LopezS. J.EdwardsL. M. (2008). The interface of counseling psychology and positive psychology: Assessing and promoting strengths. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (4th ed., pp. 86–102). John Wiley & Sons.
30.
Magyar-MoeJ. L.OwensR. L.ScheelM. J. (2015). Applications of positive psychology in counseling psychology: Current status and future directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(4), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015581001
31.
PolkinghorneD. E. (2005) Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
32.
ScheelM. JDavisC. KHendersonJ. D. (2012). Therapist use of client strengths: A qualitative study of positive processes. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(3), 392–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000012439427
SinghA.ChunK. Y. S. (2010). “From the margins to the center”: Moving towards a resilience-based model of supervision for queer people of color supervisors. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017373
