This article depicts the unique integration of science and practice found in Doctor of Psychology (PsyD) programs. To dispel myths and provide accurate information about the counseling psychology PsyD degree, survey and interview data from all nine American Psychological Association (APA)–accredited counseling psychology PsyD programs are presented. We argue that embracing PsyD programs within a unified counseling psychology training structure and value system has advantages for the field, including providing a mechanism to foster counseling psychology’s reach and social justice mission. Given the newly-articulated professional competencies of the APA Standards of Accreditation, we also suggest that maintaining counseling psychology training consistency across both Doctor of Philosophy and PsyD programs has the potential to better meet counseling psychologist career trajectories and workforce needs.
American Psychological Association. (2012). Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology. Washington, DC: Author.
BellD. J.BieschkeK. J.ZlotlowS.PaterniteC. E.Illfelder-KayeJ.McCutcheonS.KnaussL.KlonoffE.WallJ. (2017). New standards of accreditation in health service psychology: Rationale, opportunities, and challenges. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 11(4), 207–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000163
12.
BlusteinD. L.GoodyearR. K.PerryJ.CypersS. (2005). The shifting sands of counseling psychology programs’ institutional contexts: An environmental scan and revitalizing strategies. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(5), 610–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005277820
13.
BrownS.LentR. (1984). Handbook of counseling psychology (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
14.
ChwaliszK. (2003). Evidence-based practice: A framework for twenty-first-century scientist-practitioner training. The Counseling Psychologist, 31(5), 497–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000003256347
15.
Executive Service Corps of Chicago. (2018, June15). Diagnostic report for the Society of Counseling Psychology.
16.
FouadN. A.GrusC. L.HatcherR. L.KaslowN. J.HutchingsP. S.MadsonM. B.CollinsF. L.Jr.CrossmanR. E. (2009). Competency benchmarks: A model for understanding and measuring competency in professional psychology across training levels. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(Suppl. 4), S5–S26. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015832
17.
GelsoC. J.WilliamsE. N.FretzB. R. (Eds.). (2014a). Counseling psychology (3rd ed.). American Psychological Association.
18.
GelsoC. J.WilliamsE. N.FretzB. R. (2014b). History of counseling psychology (3rd ed.). In GelsoC. J.WilliamsE. N.FretzB. R., Counseling psychology (pp. 24–41). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14378-002
19.
GoodyearR. K.MurdockN.LichtenbergJ. W.McPhersonR.KoettingK.PetrenS. (2008). Stability and change in counseling psychologists’ identities, roles, functions, and career satisfaction across 15 years. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(2), 220–249. https://doi.org10.1177/0011000007309481
20.
Health Service Psychology Education Collaborative. (2013). Professional psychology in health care services: A blueprint for education and training. American Psychologist, 68(6), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033265
21.
JacksonM. A.ScheelM. J. (2013). Quality of master’s education: A concern for counseling psychology?The Counseling Psychologist, 41(5), 669–699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011000011434644
22.
LewisB. L. (2010). Social justice in practicum training: Competencies and developmental implications. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 4(3), 145–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017383
23.
MallinckrodtB.MilesJ. R.LevyJ. J. (2014). The scientist-practitioner-advocate model: Addressing contemporary training needs for social justice advocacy. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 8(4), 303–31. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000045
MunleyP. H.DuncanL. E.McdonnellK. A.SauerE. M. (2004). Counseling psychology in the United States of America. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 17(3), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070412331317602
26.
NadalK. L. (2017). “Let’s get in formation”: On becoming a psychologist–activist in the 21st century. American Psychologist, 72(9), 935–946. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000212
27.
NeimeyerG. J.SafersteinJ.RiceK. G. (2005). Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis and outcomes in academic training programs in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(5), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000005277821
28.
NorcrossJ. C.EvansK. L.EllisJ. L. (2010). The model does matter II: Admissions and training in APA-accredited counseling psychology programs. The Counseling Psychologist, 38(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339342
29.
PattonM. J. (2000). Counseling psychology training: A matter of good teaching. The Counseling Psychologist, 28(5), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000000285007
30.
RostoskyS.ClementsZ.McCubbinL.RochlenA. (2018, March3). The big picture: Fun facts from the 2017 survey of counseling psychology programs. [Presentation]. Council for Counseling Psychology Training Programs Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, United States.
31.
ScheelM. J.StabbS. D.CohnT. J.DuanC.SauerE. M. (2018). Counseling psychology model training program. The Counseling Psychologist, 46(1), 6–49. https://doi:10.1177/0011000018755512
32.
SneppF. P.PetersonD. R. (1988). Evaluative comparison of PsyD and PhD students by clinical internship supervisors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 19(2), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.19.2.180
