This article explores the boundaries between clinicians and clients in light of the construct of solidarity. A universal conception of boundaries is critiqued and a culturally congruent view of boundaries is examined, rooted in the concept of solidarity. The article includes case illustrations of the connection between boundaries and solidarity and concludes with suggestions for mental health professionals.
BacklarP. (1996). The three Rs: Roles, relationships, and rules. Community Mental Health Journal,32, 505-509.
2.
BarnettJ. E. (2007). Whose boundaries are they anyway?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 401-405.
3.
BlumL. (2007). Three kinds of race-related solidarity. Journal of Social Philosophy, 38, 53-72.
4.
BordinE. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 252-260.
5.
BorysD. S. (1994). Maintaining therapeutic boundaries: The motive is therapeutic effectiveness, not defensive practice. Ethics & Behavior, 4, 267-273.
6.
CarterJ. A. (2009). Extending the frame: Managing boundaries in a culturally responsive manner. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 434-435.
7.
CookeM. (1995). Selfhood and solidarity. Constellations, 1, 337-357.
8.
CoulehanJ. (2009). Compassionate solidarity: Suffering, poetry, and medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52, 585-603.
9.
DerpmannS. (2009). Solidarity and cosmopolitanism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 12, 303-315.
10.
FreireP. (2001). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
11.
FrommE. (1990). The sane society. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
12.
FrommE. (2002). To have or to be?New York, NY: Continuum.
13.
GallardoM. E. (2009). Ethics and multiculturalism: Where the rubber meets the road. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 426-430.
14.
GelsoC. J.KellyF. A.FuertesJ. N.MarmaroshC.HomesS. E.CostaC.HancockG. R. (2005). Measuring the real relationship in psychotherapy: Initial validation of the therapist form. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 640-649.
15.
GlassL. L. (2003). The gray areas of boundary crossings and violations. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 57, 429-444.
16.
GottliebM. C.YounggrenJ. N. (2009). Is there a slippery slope? Considerations regarding multiple relationships and risk management. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 564-571.
17.
GrahamS. R.LiddleB. J. (2009). Multiple relationships encountered by lesbian and bisexual psychotherapist: How close is too close?Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 15-21.
18.
GreenspanM. (2002). Out of bounds. In LazarusA. A.ZurO. (Eds.), Dual relationships and psychotherapy (pp. 425-431). New York, NY: Springer.
19.
GutheilT. G.GabbardG. O. (1993). The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: Theoretical and risk-management dimensions. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 188-196.
20.
HughesP. C.HeumanA. N. (2006). The communication of solidarity in friendships of African American women. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 7, 33-41.
21.
JonesJ. M. (1979). Conceptual and strategic issues in the relationship of Black psychology to American social science. In BoykinA. W.FranklinA. J.YatesJ. F. (Eds.), Research directions of Black psychologists (pp. 390-432). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
22.
JonesJ. M. (2003). TRIOS: A psychological theory of the African legacy in American cultures. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 217-242.
23.
JonesJ. M.BlockC. B. (1984). Black cultural perspectives. The Clinical Psychologist, 37, 58-62.
24.
JuulS. (2010). Solidarity and social cohesion in late modernity: A question of recognition, justice and judgement in situation. European Journal of Social Theory, 13, 253-269.
25.
KertészR. (2002). Dual relationships in psychotherapy in Latin America. In LazarusA. A.ZurO. (Eds.), Dual relationships and psychotherapy (pp. 329-334). New York, NY: Springer.
26.
KesslerL. W.WaehlerC. A. (2005). Addressing multiple relationships between clients and therapists in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 66-72.
27.
KincaidM. (1969). Identity and therapy in the Black community. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 47, 884-890.
28.
LazarusA. A. (1994). How certain boundaries and ethics diminish therapeutic effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior, 4, 255-261.
29.
LazarusA. A. (2007). Restrictive Draconian views must be vigorously challenged. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(4), 405-406.
30.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.
31.
McGuireS. (1996). Ethical decision making for helping professionals: Subtle boundary dilemmas. Center City, MN: Hazleden.
32.
MinA. K. (2005). From difference to the solidarity of others: Sublating postmodernism. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 31, 823-849.
33.
MorrowS. L. (2000). First do no harm: Therapist issues n psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. In PerezR. M.DeBordK. A.BieschkeK. J. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients (pp. 137-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
NelsonG.PrilleltenskyI.MacGillivaryH. (2001). Building value-based partnerships: Toward solidarity with oppressed groups. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 649-675.
35.
OrbeM. P. (1994). “Remember, it’s always Whites’ ball”: Descriptions of African American male communication. Communication Quarterly, 42, 287-300.
36.
ParhamT. A. (2009). Ethics and multiculturalism: Synthesizing apparent opposites into responsive treatment, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 432-434.
RodgerJ. J. (2003). Social solidarity, welfare, and post emotionalism. Journal of Social Policy, 32, 403-421.
39.
SchankJ. A.SkovholtT. M. (1997). Dual relationship dilemmas of rural and small-community psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 44-49.
40.
ShelbyT. (2005). We who are Black: The philosophical foundations of Black solidarity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
SimonR. J. (1992). Treatment boundary violations: Clinical, ethical, and legal considerations. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 20, 269-288.
42.
SmithD.FitzpatrickM. (1995). Patient-therapist boundary issues: An integrative review of theory and research. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 499-506.
43.
SpeightS. L.VeraE. M.CaldwellJ.ClarkeM.WestM. (2006, August) Developing culturally competent practices: Clinicians’ reports of “what works.”Poster presented at American Psychological Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
44.
ThompsonS. V. L.BazileA.AkbarM. (2004). African American’s perceptions of psychotherapy and psychotherapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 19-26.
45.
VasquezM. J. T. (2007). Sometimes a taco is just a taco!Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38, 406-408.
46.
VeraE. M.SpeightS. L. (2003). Multicultural competence, social justice and counseling psychology: Expanding our roles. The Counseling Psychologist, 31, 253-272.
47.
WardE. C. (2005). Keeping it real: A grounded theory study of African American clients engaging in counseling at a community mental health agency. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 471-481.
48.
WelfelE. R. (2006). Ethics in counseling and psychotherapy: Standards, research, and emerging issues (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49.
WheelessL. R. (1978). A follow-up study of the relationships among trust, disclosure, and interpersonal solidarity. Human Communication Research, 4, 143-157.
50.
WildeL. (2004). Erich Fromm and the quest for solidarity. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
51.
ZurO. (2007). Boundaries in psychotherapy: Ethical and clinical explorations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
ZurO.LazarusA. (2002). Six arguments against dual relationships and their rebuttals. In LazarusA.ZurO. (Eds.), Dual relationships and psychotherapy (pp. 3-24). New York, NY: Springer.
