One of the many factors that is thought to make it possible for a state to abstain from participating in a war between two or more other states is the existence of international norms that support the concept of neutrality. According to realist theory, these norms are most likely to arise in balance-of-power systems, when alliances are flexible and military capabilities are distributed among the great powers in a pattern of approximate parity. Conversely, they are expected to decay when alliances become polarized into rigid blocs and military capabilities are highly concentrated. Based on the results of a time-series analysis of data from the 1820-1969 period, it was concluded that alliance polarization had no statistically significant impact on the salience of neutrality norms. On the other hand, the distribution of military capabilities did have a significant impact under certain conditions. During periods when ongoing warfare did not include the great powers, the salience of neutrality norms increased as military capabilities became more dispersed toward a pattern of rough equality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
af Ugglas, Margaretha
(1994) `Sweden's Security Policy in Post-Cold War Europe', NATO Review42(2): 10-15.
2.
Anabtawi, Samir N.
(1965) `Neutralists and Neutralism', Journal of Politics27(2): 351-361.
3.
Andrén, Nils
(1991) `On the Meaning and Uses of Neutrality', Cooperation and Conflict16(2): 67-83.
4.
Åström, Sverker
(1983) Sweden's Policy of Neutrality. Stockholm: Swedish Institute.
5.
Bauslaugh, Robert A.
(1991) The Concept of Neutrality in Classical Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Beveridge, William
(1945) The Price of Peace. New York: Norton.
7.
Bhattacharya, K. K.
(1982) Public International Law, 6th ed.Allahabad: Central Law Agency, Bhrigu Press.
8.
Black, Cyril E.
, Falk, Richard A., Knorr, Klaus and Young, Oran R. (1968) Neutralization and World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
Bodin, Jean
(1992) [1576]. `The State's Need of Armed Force to Protect its Interests', in Evan Luard (ed.) Basic Texts in International Relations, pp. 136-139. New York: St Martin's Press.
10.
Bonjour, Edgar
(1946) Swiss Neutrality. London: Allen & Unwin.
11.
Butterfield, Herbert
(1968) `Balance of Power', in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wright (eds) Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Relations, pp. 132-148. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
12.
Carlbom, Terry
(1989) Rethinking Swedish Neutrality. Lampeter, Wales: Saint David's University College.
13.
Churchill, Winston
(1974) `A Hideous State of Alarm and Menace', in Robert Rhodes James (ed.) Winston Churchill: His Complete Speeches, 1897-1963, Vol. 6, pp. 6199-6201. New York: Chelsea House.
14.
Coplin, William D.
(1968) `International Law and Assumptions About the State System', in Richard A. Falk and WolframF. Hanrieder (eds) International Law and Organization, pp. 15-34. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
15.
Cummings, Edward R.
(1978) `The Evolution of the Notion of Neutrality in Modern Armed Conflict', Revue de Droit Pénal Militaire et de Droit de la Guerre17(1): 37-69.
16.
De Visscher, Charles
(1968) Theory and Reality in Public International Law, trans. by P. E. Corbett. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
Elgström, Ole
and Jerneck, Magnus (1995) `Long Peace-Stable Peace 1814-1855: The Swedish Experience'. Paper presented at the Second Pan-European Conference in International Relations, Paris, France.
18.
Fenwick, Charles W.
(1948) International Law, 3rd ed.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
19.
Franck, Thomas M.
(1994) `Fairness in the International Legal and International System', Recueil des Cours3: 9-498. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
20.
Frei, Daniel
(1986) `Neutrality', in Ervin Laszlo and Jong Youl Yoo (eds) World Encyclopedia of Peace, pp. 28-35. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
21.
Frei, Daniel
(1979) Neutrality and Non-Alignment: Convergencies and Contrasts. Zurich: Kleine Studien zur Politischen Wissenschaft, no. 175.
22.
Goldmann, Kjell
(1971) International Norms and War Between States. Stockholm: Laromedelsforlagen.
23.
Grotius, Hugo
(1949) The Law of War and Peace, trans. by L. Loomis. New York: Walter J. Black.
24.
Gulick, Edward Vose
(1955) Europe's Classical Balance of Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
Hägglöf, H. Gunnar
(1970) `A Test of Neutrality: Sweden in the Second World War', in Roderick Ogley (ed.) The Theory and Practice of Neutrality in the Twentieth Century, pp. 153-172. New York: Barnes & Noble.
26.
Hakovirta, Harto
(1988) East-West Conflict and European Neutrality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Halinen, Hannu
(1991) Finland and the United Nations. Helsinki: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
28.
Hall, William
(1874) The Rights and Duties of Neutrals. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
29.
Hofer, Walther
(1957) Neutrality as the Principle of Swiss Foreign Policy, trans. by Mary Hottinger. Zurich: Guggenbühl & Huber.
30.
Holbraad, Carsten
(1971) `The Role of Middle Powers', Cooperation and Conflict1(2): 77-90.
31.
Jacobs, A. J.
(1917) Neutrality Versus Justice. London: T. Fisher Unwin.
32.
Jakobson, Max
(1987) Finland: Myth and Reality. Helsinki: Otava.
33.
Jessup, Philip C.
and Deák, Francis (1935) Neutrality: Its History, Economics and Law, Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
34.
Joenniemi, Pertti
(1989) `The Underlying Assumptions of Finnish Neutrality', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael H. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 49-60. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
35.
Kaplan, Morton A.
and Katzenbach, Nicholas deB. (1961) The Political Foundations of International Law. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
36.
Karsh, Efrain
(1988) Neutrality and Small States. London: Routledge.
37.
Kegley, Charles W., Jr.
and Raymond, Gregory A. (1990) When Trust Breaks Down: Alliance Norms and World Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
38.
Kegley, Charles W., Jr.
and Raymond, Gregory A. (1994) A Multipolar Peace? Great-Power Politics in the Twenty-first Century. New York: St Martin's.
39.
Kekkonen, Urho
(1970) Neutrality: The Finnish Position. London: Heinemann.
40.
Komarnicki, Titus
(1952) `The Place of Neutrality in the Modern System of International Law', Recueil des Cours, Vol. 1, pp. 399-510. Paris: Librarie du Recueil Sirey.
41.
Kreisky, Bruno
(1959) `Austria Draws the Balance', Foreign Affairs37(2): 269-281.
42.
Kruzel, Joseph
(1989) `The Future of European Neutrality', in Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 295-311. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
43.
Lefever, Ernest W.
(1962) `Nehru, Nasser, and Nkrumah on Neutralism', in Laurence W. Martin (ed.) Neutralism and Nonalignment: The New States in World Affairs, pp. 93-120. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
44.
Lyon, Peter
(1960) `Neutrality and the Emergence of the Concept of Neutralism', Review of Politics22 (April): 255-268.
45.
Machiavelli, Niccolò
(1950) [1513]. The Prince, trans. by Luigi Ricci. New York: Random House.
46.
Martin, Laurence W.
(1962) `Introduction: The Emergence of the New States', in Laurence W. Martin (ed.) Neutralism and Nonalignment: The New States in World Affairs, pp. xi-xxi. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
47.
Morgenthau, Hans J.
(1939) `The Resurrection of Neutrality in Europe', American Political Science Review23(3): 473-486.
48.
Neuhold, Hanspeter
(1979) `Permanent Neutrality and Non-Alignment: Similarities and Differences', Österreichische Zeitschrift für Aussenpolitik19(2): 79-99.
49.
Neuhold, Hanspeter
(1988) `The Neutral States in Europe: Similarities and Differences', in Alan T. Leonhard (ed.) Neutrality: Changing Concepts and Practices, pp. 97-144. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
50.
Ogley, Roderick
(1970) Neutrality in the Twentieth Century. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
51.
Ørvik, Nils
(1953) The Decline of Neutrality, 1914-41. Oslo: Grundt Tanum.
52.
Partem, Michael Greenfield
(1983) `The Buffer System in International Relations', Journal of Conflict Resolution27(1): 3-26.
53.
Phillipson, Coleman
(1911) The International Law and Custom of Ancient Greece and Rome, Vol. 2. London: Macmillan.
54.
Politis, Nicolas
(1935) Neutrality and Peace, trans. by Francis Crane Mackan. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
55.
Rösch, Manfred
(1993) `Switzerland's Security Policy in Transition', NATO Review41(6): 19-25.
56.
Sabrosky, Alan Ned
(1985) `Alliance Aggregation, Capability Distribution, and the Expansion of Interstate War', in Alan Ned Sabrosky (ed.) Polarity and War: The Changing Structure of International Conflict, pp. 145-189. Boulder: Westview.
57.
Sastry, K. R. R.
(1966) `Hinduism and International Law', Recueil des Cours, Vol. 1, pp. 507-615. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.
58.
Schroeder, Paul
(1994) `Historical Reality vs. Neo-realist Theory', International Security19(1): 108-148.
59.
Schweller, Randall
(1994) `Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In', International Security19(1): 72-107.
60.
Small, Melvin
and Singer, J. David (1982) Resort to Arms: International and Civil Wars, 1816-1980. Beverly Hills: Sage.
61.
Ståhlberg, Krister
(1989) `Finnish Neutrality and Public Opinion', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael L. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 241-262. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
62.
Sundelius, Bengt
(ed.) (1987) The Neutral Democracies and the New Cold War. Boulder: Westview.
63.
Sundelius, Bengt
(1989a) `National Security Dilemmas and Strategies for the European Neutrals', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael H. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 98-121. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
Swift, Richard N.
(1969) International Law: Current and Classic. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
66.
Thalberg, Hans
(1989) `The Role of Public Opinion in Neutral Policy', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael H. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 231-240. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
67.
Thucydides
(1951) History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. by Richard Crawley. New York: Random House.
68.
Tung, William L.
(1968) International Law in an Organizing World. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
69.
Väyrynen, Raimo
(1989) `Commentary', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael H. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 122-129. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
70.
Verosta, Stephen
(1964) `International Law in Europe and Western Asia Between 100 and 650 A.D.', Recueil des Cours, Vol. 3, pp. 491-620. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff.
71.
Vetschera, Heinz
(1985) `Legal Theory and Military Practice in European Neutrals' Defense Policies', Defense Analysis1(1): 51-65.
72.
von Glahn, Gerhard
(1996) Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law, 7th ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
73.
Vukadinović, Radovan
(1982) `The Original Concept of Non-Alignment', Österreichische Zeitschrift für Aussenpolitik22(1): 20-22.
74.
Wahlbäck, Krister
(1992) `Swedish Security in a Changing Europe', Current Sweden391 (June): 1-6.
75.
Walker, Richard L.
(1953) The Multi-State System in Ancient China. Hamden: Shoe String Press.
76.
Walker, Thomas Alfred
(1899) A History of the Law of Nations, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Walt, Stephen M.
(1985) `Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power', International Security9(4): 3-43.
78.
Wayman, Frank
(1985) `Bipolarity, Multipolarity, and the Threat of War', in Alan Ned Sabrosky (ed.) Polarity and War: The Changing Structure of International Conflict, pp. 115-144. Boulder: Westview.
79.
Wheaton, Henry
(1845) History of the Law of Nations in Europe and America. New York: Gould, Banks.
80.
Whitaker, Urban G.
(1964) Power and Politics. New York: Harper & Row.
81.
Wicker, Cyrus French
(1911) `The United States and Neutralization', reprint of an essay published by Oxford University Press.
82.
Widmer, Sigmund
(1989) `Forms of Neutrality', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael H. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 17-28. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
83.
Windsor, Philip
(1989) `Neutral States in Historical Perspective', in Joseph Kruzel and Michael H. Haltzel (eds) Between the Blocs: Problems and Prospects for Europe's Neutral and Nonaligned States, pp. 3-9. Cambridge: Woodrow Wilson International Center and Cambridge University Press.
84.
Wolfers, Arnold
(1962) Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
85.
Wright, Quincy
(1965) A Study of War, 2nd ed.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
