The subject of this article is how deadlocks in international negotiations may be solved. Despite the fact that deadlock is a common phenomenon in international negotiations, this subject has received little attention from negotiation theorists. This analysis, which is based on five instances of deadlocks that occurred during the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, focuses on (a) the negotiating parties' attempts and ability to solve deadlocks by coercion and persuasion, package deals and fractionating, and innovations, (b) how non-controversial elements, uncertainty, vagueness, symbolic formulas and residual disagreement can be used to solve deadlocks, and (c) how the perceptions of the negotiation and the presence of internal negotiations may limit the negotiation parties' possibilities to solve deadlocks. The analysis shows that innovations that are non-controversial, in the sense that they are hard to relate to the positions of the parties in terms of concessions or retractions, may play an important role in solving deadlocks. Furthermore, it indicates that agreements that follow deadlocks are often characterized by uncertainty, vagueness, symbolic formulas and residual disagreement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ambrosius, L. E.
(1975) `Wilson, Clemenceau and the German Problem at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919', Rocky Mountain Social Science Journal12.
2.
Birdsall, P.
(1941) Versailles Twenty Years After. London: George Allen and Unwin.
3.
British Documents on Foreign Affairs: Reports and Papers from the Foreign Office Confidential Print, Series 1, The Paris Peace Conference of 1919. University Publications of America 1989.
4.
Burnett, P. M.
(1940) Reparation at the Paris Peace Conference. From the Standpoint of the American Delegation, vols I-II. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Coddington, A.
(1968) Theories of the Bargaining Process. London: George Allen and Unwin.
6.
Dockrill, M. L.
and Goold, J. D. (1981) Peace without Promise. Britain and the Peace Conference 1919-1923. London: Batsford.
7.
Eckstein, H.
(1975) `Case Study and Theory in Political Science', in F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds) Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8.
Elcock, H.
(1972) Portrait of a Decision. The Council of Four and the Treaty of Versailles. London: Eyre Methuen.
9.
George, A. L.
(1970) `Case Studies and Theory Development: The Method of Structured, Focused Comparison', in P. G. Lauren (ed.) Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy. New York: Free Press.
10.
Graber, D.
(1976) Verbal Behavior and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
11.
Gunzenhäuser, M.
(1970) Die Pariser Friedenskonferenz und die Friedensverträge 1919-1920. Frankfurt am Main: Bernard und Graefe.
12.
Haass, R. N.
(1990) Conflicts Unending. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13.
Hankey, M.
(1946) Diplomacy by Conference. Studies in Public Affairs 1920-1945. London: Ernest Benn.
14.
Holsti, K. J.
(1991) Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Hopmann, P. T.
(1991) `The Changing International Environment and the Resolution of International Conflicts', in L. Kreisberg and S. J. Thorson (eds) Timing the De-Escalation of International Conflicts. New York: Syracuse University Press.
16.
Iklé, F. C.
(1964) How Nations Negotiate. New York: Praeger.
17.
Jervis, R.
(1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
Jones, E. E.
and Nisbett, R. E. (1971) `The Actor and the Observer; Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior', in E. E. Joneset al. (eds) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
19.
Jönsson, C.
(1975) The Soviet Union and the Test Ban: A Study in Soviet Negotiation Behavior. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
20.
Jönsson, C.
(1990) Communication in International Bargaining. London: Pinter.
21.
Jönsson, C.
(1991) `Cognitive Theory', in V. A. Kremenyuk (ed.) International Negotiation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Lakos, A.
(1989) International Negotiations: A Bibliography. Boulder, CO: Westview.
23.
Lebow, R. N.
(1981) Between Peace and War. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Lewicki, R. J.
and Litterer, J. A. (1985) Negotiation. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
25.
Lockhart, C.
(1979) Bargaining in International Conflicts. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Mantoux, P.
(1964) Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Proceedings of the Council of Four (March 24-April 18). Geneva: Librairie Droz.
27.
Marston, F. S.
(1944) The Peace Conference of 1919. London: Oxford University Press.
28.
McCrum, R.
(1978) `French Rhineland Policy at the Paris Peace Conference 1919', Historical Journal21(3).
29.
Mitchell, C. R.
(1981) The Structure of International Conflict. London: Macmillan.
30.
Neale, M. A.
and Bazerman, M. H. (1985) `Perspectives for Understanding Negotiation: Viewing Negotiation as a Judgmental Process', Journal of Conflict Resolution29(1).
31.
Nelson. H. I.
(1963) Land and Power. British and Allied Policy on Germany's Frontiers 1916-19. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
32.
Nisbett, R.
and Ross, L. (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
33.
Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States
(1941-46) 1919 The Paris Peace Conference. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
34.
Papers Respecting Negotiations for an Anglo-French Pact (1924) Cmd 2169. London: HMSO.
35.
Pillar, P. R.
(1983) Negotiating Peace. War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
Preussen, R. W.
(1974) `John Foster Dulles and Reparations at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919: Early Patterns of Life', Perspectives in American History8.
37.
Pruitt, D. G.
(1971) `Indirect Communication and the Search for Agreement in Negotiation', Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
38.
Pruitt, D. G.
(1981) Negotiating Behavior. New York: Academic.
39.
Pruitt, D. G.
(1991) `Strategy in Negotiation', in V. A. Kremenyuk (ed.) International Negotiation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
Pruitt, D. G.
and Rubin, J. Z. (1986) Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate and Settlement. New York: Random.
41.
Putnam, R.
(1988) `Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games', International Organization42(1).
42.
Raiffa, H.
(1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Ramberg, B.
(1977) `Tactical Advantages of Opening Positioning Strategies. Lessons from the Seabed Arms Control Talks 1967-1970', Journal of Conflict Resolution21(4).
44.
Rittberger, V.
(1983) `Global Conference Diplomacy and International Policy-Making: The Case of UN-Sponsored World Conferences', European Journal of Political Research11.
45.
Rubin, J. Z.
(1983) `Negotiation. An Introduction to Some Issues and Themes', American Behavioral Scientist27(2).
46.
Rubin, J. Z.
(1991) `The Timing of Ripeness and the Ripeness of Timing', in L. Kriesberg and S. J. Thorson (eds) Timing the De-Escalation of International Conflicts. New York: Syracuse University Press.
47.
Sawyer, J.
and Guetzkow, H. (1965) `Bargaining and Negotiation in International Relations', in H. C. Kelman (ed.) International Behavior. A Social-Psychological Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
48.
Snyder, G. H.
and Diesing, P. (1977) Conflict among Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
Stenelo, L.-G.
(1972) Mediation in International Negotiations. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
50.
Stevens, C.
(1963) Strategy and Collective Bargaining Negotiation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.
Stevenson, D.
(1982) French War Aims against Germany 1914-1919. Oxford: Clarendon.
52.
Tardieu, A.
(1921) The Truth about the Treaty. Indianapolis: Bobbs.
53.
Tillman, S. P.
(1961) Anglo-American Relations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
Touval, S.
and Zartman, I. W. (1985) (eds) International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview.
55.
Trachtenberg, M.
(1980) Reparations in World Politics: France and European Economic Diplomacy, 1916-1923. New York: Columbia University Press.
56.
Underdal, A.
(1991) `The Outcomes of Negotiation', in V. A. Kremenyuk (ed.) International Negotiation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
57.
Walton, R. E.
and McKersie, R. B. (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Winham, G. R.
(1977) `Negotiation as a Management Process', World Politics30(1).
59.
Winham, G. R.
(1979) `Practitioners' Views of International Negotiation', World Politics32.
60.
Winham, G. R.
(1987) `Multilateral Economic Negotiations', Negotiation Journal.
61.
Young, O.
(1968) The Politics of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
Young, O.
(1989) International Cooperation. Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
63.
Young, O.
(1991) `Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society', International Organization45(3).
64.
Zartman, I. W.
(1978) `Negotiation as a Joint Decision-Making Process', in W. I. Zartman (ed.) The Negotiation Process. Theories and Applications. Beverly Hills, CA and London: Sage.
65.
Zartman, I. W.
(1985) Ripe for Resolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
66.
Zartman, I. W.
(1991) `Regional Conflict Resolution', in V. A. Kremenyuk (ed.) International Negotiation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
67.
Zartman, I. W.
and Aurik, J. (1991) `Power Strategies in De-Escalation', in L. Kriesberg & S. J. Thorson (eds) Timing the De-Escalation of International Conflicts. New York: Syracuse University Press.
68.
Zartman, I. W.
and Berman, K. R. (1982) The Practical Negotiator. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
