The question of how the domestic political context of democratic countries affects their foreign policies has received increasing interest in political science research during the last few years. In this article, the interrelationships between public opinion and public statements by presidential candidates are studied for the US presidential elections from 1968 through to 1988. The issues covered are the explanations of Soviet foreign policy and the prescriptions for US policy responses, here collectively called the image of the Soviet Union, which are offered by the two (in two cases three) main contenders for the presidency. It is found that there is a tendency for the main thrust of the debate on relations with the Soviet Union to shift from one election to the next, no matter what the Soviet Union has done between the elections. This shift can be summarized as a movement from a `hawkish' approach to a `dove-like' one. In particular, presidential candidates who ran for re-election changed their message from the first election to the next. The hypothesis that presidential candidates adjusted their images of the Soviet Union directly to the views of the public as expressed in opinion surveys did not receive confirmation, however.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldrich, J. H.
, Sullivan, J. L. and Borgida, E. (1989) `Foreign Affairs and Issue Voting: Do Presidential Candidates “Waltz Before A Blind Audience?” ', American Political Science Review83(1): 123-141.
2.
Alexander, A. J.
(1984) `Modeling Soviet Defense Decisonmaking', in J. Valenta and W. Potter (eds) Soviet Decisionmaking for National Security. London: Allen and Unwin.
3.
Budge, I.
and Hofferbert, R. I. (1990) `Mandates and Policy Outputs: US Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures', American Political Science Review84(1).
4.
Bunce, V.
(1981) Do New Leaders Make A Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Destler, I. M.
, Gelb, L. and Lake, T. (1984) Our Own Worst Enemy. New York: Simon and Schuster.
6.
Fishel, J.
(1985) Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
7.
Gaddis, J. L.
(1988) `The Evolution of US Policy Goals Towards the USSR in the Postwar Era', in S. Bialer and M. Mandelbaum (eds) Gorbachev's Russia and American Foreign Policy. An East-West Forum Publication. Boulder, CO: Westview.
8.
Genco, S. J. (1984) `The Attentive Public and American Foreign Policy', PhD dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
9.
Glaser, C.
(1989) `Why Do Strategists Disagree about the Requirements of Strategic Nuclear Deterrence?' in L. Eden and S. E. Miller (eds) Nuclear Arguments. Understanding the Strategic Nuclear Arms and Arms Control Debates. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
Graham, T. W. (1989) `The Politics of Failure: Strategic Nuclear Arms Control, Public Opinion, and Domestic Policies in the United States—1945-1980', PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
11.
Gray, C. S.
(1986) Nuclear Strategy and National Style. Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press/Abt Books.
12.
Hallenberg, J.
(1986) The Domestic Context of the Making of America's Soviet Policy: A Review of the Literature. Research Report No. 2, Group for Research on Peace and Security Policy. Stockholm: Department of Political Science.
13.
Hallenberg, J.
(1991) The Image of the Soviet Union in US Presidential Elections. Research Report No. 1991:3. Stockholm: Department of Political Science.
14.
Hart, R. P.
(1987) The Sound of Leadership: Presidential Communication in the Modern Age. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
15.
Herrmann, R.F.
(1985) Perceptions and Behavior in Soviet Foreign Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
16.
Holsti, O. R.
(1979) `The Three-Headed Eagle: The United States and System Change', International Studies Quarterly23(3): 339-359.
17.
Holsti, O. R.
(1992) `Public Opinion and Foreign Policy: Challenges to the Almond-Lippmann Consensus', International Studies Quarterly36(4): 439-466.
18.
Holsti, O. R
and Rosenau, J. N. (1979) `Vietnam, Consensus, and the Belief Systems of American Leaders', World Politics32(1): 1-56.
19.
Holsti, O. R.
and Rosenau, J. N. (1984) American Leadership in World Affairs: Vietnam and the Breakdown of Consensus. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
20.
Johnson, R. H.
(1983) `Periods of Peril: The Window of Vulnerability and Other Myths', Foreign Affairs61(4): 950-970.
21.
Jönsson, C.
(1984) Superpower: Comparing American and Soviet Foreign Policy. London: Frances Pinter.
22.
Kessell, J. H.
(1984) Presidential Campaign Politics: Coalition Strategies and Citizen Response, 2nd ed.Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
23.
Levine, R. A.
(1963) The Arms Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Levine, R. A.
(1990) Still the Arms Debate. A RAND Corporation Research Study. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
25.
Mandelbaum, M.
and Schneider, W. (1979) `The New Internationalisms', in K. Oye, D. Rothchild, R. Lieber (eds) Eagle Entangled: US Foreign Policy in a Complex World. New York: Longman.
26.
Meyer, S. M.
(1984) `Soviet National Security Decisionmaking: What Do We Know and What Do We Understand?' in J. Valenta and W. Potter (eds) Soviet Decisionmaking for National Security. London: Allen and Unwin.
27.
Neuman, W.R.
(1986) The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
Nincic, M.
(1988). `The United States, the Soviet Union, and the Politics of Opposites', World Politics40(4): 452-475.
29.
Nincic, M.
(1989) Anatomy of Hostility: The US-Soviet Hostility in Perspective. San Francisco, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
30.
Nincic, M.
(1990) `US Soviet Policy and the Electoral Connection', World Politics42(3): 370-396.
31.
Nye, J. S., Jr
(1984) `The Domestic Roots of American Policy', in Nye (ed.) The Making of America's Soviet Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
Nygren, B.
(1992) American Sovietology and Knowledge Utilization in the Formulation of US Soviet Policy: The Political Influence of Sovietologists in the Eighties and Consequences for Scholarly Research. Research Report No. 1992:3. Stockholm: Department of Political Science.
33.
Osgood, R. E.
(ed.) (1981) Containment, Soviet Behavior and Grand Strategy. Public Papers in International Affairs, Number 16. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
34.
Oudenaren, J. van.
(1982) US Leadership Perceptions of the Soviet Problem Since 1945. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, R-2843-NA.
35.
Page, B. I.
(1978) Choices and Echoes in Presidential Elections. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
36.
Page, B. I.
and Shapiro, R. Y. (1983) `Effects of Public Opinion of Policy', American Political Science Review77(1): 175-190.
37.
Page, B. I.
and Shapiro, R. Y. (1992) The Rational Public. Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
38.
Rattinger, H.
(1990) `Foreign Policy vs. Domestic Issues as Determinants of Voting Behavior in the 1988 Presidential Election', paper presented at the 31st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Washington, DC.
39.
Risse-Kappen, T.
(1991) `Public Opinion, Domestic Structure, and Foreign Policy in Liberal Democracies', World Politics43(4): 479-512.
40.
Rosenau, J. N.
(1987) `Toward Single-Country Theories of Foreign Policy: The Case of the USSR', in C. F. Hermann, C. W. Kegley, Jr and J. N. Rosenau (eds) New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
41.
Russett, B.
(1990) Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Schneider, W.
(1983) `Conservatism, Not Interventionism: Trends in Foreign Policy Opinion, 1974-1982', in K. Oye, R. Lieber and D. Rothchild (eds) Eagle Defiant. United States Foreign Policy in the 1980s. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
43.
Schneider, W.
(1987) ` “Rambo” and Reality: Having It Both Ways', in K. Oye, R. Lieber and D. Rothchild (eds) Eagle Resurgent? The Reagan Era in American Foreign Policy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
44.
Seay, D.
(1989) `What Are the Soviets' Objectives in Their Foreign, Military, and Arms Control Policies?', in L. Eden and S. E. Miller (eds) Nuclear Arguments. Understanding the Strategic Nuclear Arms and Arms Control Debate. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
45.
Sloss, L.
(1984) `The Strategist's Perspective', in A. B. Carter and D. N. Schwartz (eds) Ballistic Missile Defense. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
46.
Stokes, D.
(1966) `Spatial Models of Party Competition', in A. Campbell, P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller and D. Stokes (eds) Elections and the New Political Order. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Volgy, T. J.
and Schwarz, J. E. (1991) `Does Politics Stop at the Water's Edge? Domestic Political Factors and Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Cases of Great Britain, France, and West Germany', Journal of Politics53(3): 615-643.
48.
Welch, W.
(1970) American Images of Soviet Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Wittkopf, E. R.
(1986) `On the Foreign Policy Beliefs of the American People: A Critique and Some Evidence', International Studies Quarterly34(4): 425-445.
50.
Wittkopf, E. R.
(1990) Faces of Internationalism. Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
Wittkopf, E. R.
and DeHaven, M. J. (1987) `Soviet Behavior, Presidential Popularity, and the Penetration of Open Political Systems: A Diachronic Analysis', in C. F. Hermann, C. W. Kegley, Jr and J. N. Rosenau (eds) New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy. Boston, MA: Allen and Unwin.
52.
Zimmerman, W.
(1974) `Choices in the Postwar World (1): Containment and the Soviet Union', in C. Gati (ed.) Caging the Bear: Containment and the Soviet Union. Indianapolis and New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
