The Contemporary Debate in International Relations Theory and Raymond Aron's Epistemology and Ontology

Abstract

This article is a contribution to recent Anglo-American metatheoretical discussions in international politics. Its topic of research is Raymond Aron's Aristotelian theory and its relation to Kenneth Waltz's Galilean ideal of science. The study departs from the assumption that Aron's theory can be better understood if interpreted from the point of view of his epistemological thought. This starting-point leads to Wilhelm Dilthey's critique of historical reason, which first appeared in Aron's doctoral dissertation in the 1930s where he used it as a working name for his own project. Later, Aron very seldom referred to this period of his life. As very few explicit references in Aron's texts on international politics to Dilthey's hermeneutics can be found, I have constructed some of the main topics of critique of historical reason and tried to analyse their meaning for Aron's theory. Concepts like Erlebnis, objective spirit, bifurcation and teleological causality are important keys to Aron's epistemology, which seems to have an antinomic relationship with Kenneth Waltz's structural systems theory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron, R. (1959) `Max Weber', Le Contrat social 2(3): 87-96.

Aron, R. (1962) Paix et guerre entre les nations. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

Aron, R. (1963) `Une Sociologie des relations internationales', Revue Française Sociologique 6: 307-320.

Aron, R. (1967) `What Is the Theory of International Relations', Journal of International Affairs 31: 185-206.

Aron, R. (1968) `The Philosophy of History', in M. Faber (ed.) Philosophic Thought in France and the US, pp. 301-320. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Aron, R. (1970) `Theory and Theories in International Relations. A Conceptual Analysis', in N. Palmer (ed.) A Design for International Relations Research. Scope, Theory, Methods and Relevance, pp. 55-66. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political Science.

Aron, R. (1972) Etudes politiques. Paris: Gallimard.

Aron, R. (1974) `Récit, analyse, interprétation, explication', Archives Européennes de Sociologie 2(15): 206-242.

Aron, R. (1983) Mémoires, 50 ans de réflexion politique. Paris: Julliard.

10.

Aron, R. (1984) Les Dernières années du siècle. Paris: Julliard.

11.

Aron, R. (1986) Introduction à la philosophie de l'histoire. Essai sur les limites de l'objectivité historique. Paris: Gallimard.

12.

Aron, R. (1989) Leçon sur l'histoire. Paris: Fallois.

13.

Ashley, R. (1986) `The Poverty of Neorealism', in R. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and Its Critics, pp. 255-300. New York: Columbia University Press.

14.

Carlsnaes, W. C. (1992) `The Agency-Structure Problems in Foreign Policy Analysis', International Studies Quarterly 36: 245-270.

15.

Cox, R. (1986) `Social Forces, States and World Orders Beyond International Relations Theory', in R. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp. 204-254. New York: Columbia University Press.

16.

Dessler, D. (1989) `What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?', International Organization 3(43): 441-473.

17.

Dilthey, W. (1970) Der Aufbau des Geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

18.

Dilthey, W. (1976) Selected Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Durkheim, E. (1973) Les Règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: PUF.

20.

Ermarth, M. (1978) The Critique of Historical Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Gadamer, H. G. (1988) Truth and Method. London: Sheed and Ward.

22.

Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

23.

Giddens, A. (1979) Yhteiskuntatieteiden keskeisiä ongelmia. Toiminnan, rakenteen ja ristiriidan käsitteet yhteiskunta-analyysissä. Keuruu: Otava.

24.

Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1991) `Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations', Review of International Studies 17: 393-410.

25.

Kaplan, M. (1968) `Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations', in Morton Kaplan (ed.) New Approaches to International Relations, pp. 1-18. New York: St Martin's Press.

26.

Keohane, R. (1988) `International Institutions', International Studies Quarterly 4(32): 379-396.

27.

Luterbacher, U. (1985) `The Frustrated Commentator: An Evaluation of the Work of Raymond Aron', International Studies Quarterly 29: 39-49.

28.

Makkreel, R. A. (1975) Dilthey, Philosopher of the Human Studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

29.

Merle, M. (1984) `Le Dernier message de Raymond Aron, Système interétatique ou société internationale?', Revue française de science politique 6(34): 1181-1197.

30.

Mesure, S. (1990) Dilthey et la fondation des sciences historiques. Paris: PUF.

31.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1967) Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf.

32.

Von Wright, G. H. (1971) Explanation and Understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

33.

Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

34.

Waltz, K. (1986) `Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics', in R. Keohane (ed.) Neorealism and its Critics, pp. 322-346. New York: Columbia University Press.

35.

Wendt, A. (1987) `The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory', International Organization 3(41): 335-370.

36.

Wendt, A. (1991) `Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations', Review of International Studies 17: 383-392.

37.

Young, O. (1969) `Aron and the Whale', in K. Norr and J. N. Rosenau (eds) Contending Approaches to International Politics, pp. 128-143. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.