Recent developments in the Arctic demonstrate that the region is experiencing greater international cooperation and moving towards the implementation of a more comprehensive multilateral legal regime. In the Antarctic, the state parties to the Antarctic Treaty have also recently negotiated a Protocol which seeks to implement more effective means of environmental protection and prohibit mining activities. While both regions are presently dominated by environmental protection concerns, there are other common issue areas that the polar regions share. This article argues that, by reviewing the developments that have occurred in the past 30 years in Antarctica, `polar lessons' can be learned from that experience which may prove useful for the Arctic. To that end, the Antarctic Treaty system is reviewed and a critical analysis is undertaken of the successes and weaknesses of the Antarctic regime with conclusions drawn as to how these experiences may be helpful in the Arctic context.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Auburn, F. M.
(1979) `Consultative Status Under the Antarctic Treaty', International and Comparative Law Quarterly28: 514-522.
2.
Auburn, F. M.
(1982) Antarctic Law and Politics. London: C. Hurst.
3.
Beck, P. J.
(1984) `The United Nations and Antarctica', Polar Record22 (137): 137-144.
4.
Beck, P. J.
(1986) The International Politics of Antarctica. Sydney: Croom Helm.
5.
Beck, P. J.
(1989) `Entering the Age of Polar Regions: The Arctic and Antarctic are No Longer Poles Apart', AMBIO18(1): 92-94.
6.
Beck, P. J.
(1991) `Antarctica, Vina del Mar and the 1990 UN debate', Polar Record27(162): 211-216.
7.
Beck, P. J.
(1992) `The 1991 UN Session: the Environmental Protocol Fails to Satisfy the Antarctic Treaty System's Critics', Polar Record28(167): 307-314.
8.
Berkman, P. A.
(1992) `The Antarctic Marine Ecosystem and Humankind', Reviews in Aquatic Sciences6(3/4): 295-333.
9.
Blay, S. K. N.
and Tsamenyi, B. M. (1990) `Australia and the Convention for the Regulation of Antarctic Mineral Resource Activities (CRAMRA)', Polar Record26: 195-202.
10.
Boyle, A. E.
(1988) `Remarks on Legal Regimes of the Arctic', American Society of International Law Proceedings82: 323-328.
11.
Bush, W. M.
(1982) Antarctica and International Law, Vol. I. London: Oceana.
12.
Caflisch, L.
(1992) `The Interaction of Science and Politics in the Field of International Relations: the Case of Antarctica', Polar Record28: 159-162.
13.
Cox, D.
and Rauf, T. (1989) Security Co-operation in the Arctic: A Canadian Response to Gorbachev's Murmansk Initiative. Ottawa: Arms Control Centre.
14.
Franckx, E.
(1991) `Marine Scientific Research and the Soviet Arctic', Polar Record27: 325-337.
15.
Franckx, E.
(1992) `Environmental Protection: An Antarctic Comparison', in J. Verhoeven, P. Sands and M. Bruce (eds) The Antarctic Environment and International Law, pp. 109-119. London: Graham and Trotman.
16.
Gizewski, P.
(1993) `Arctic Security After the Thaw: A Post-Cold War Assessment', Aurora Papers (Canadian Centre for Global Security) 17.
17.
Golitsyn, V.
(1989) `The Arctic—On the Way to Regional Cooperation', Marine Policy Reports1: 91-99.
18.
Hanessian, J.
(1960) `The Antarctic Treaty 1959', International and Comparative Law Quarterly9: 436-480.
19.
Hayton, R. D.
(1960) `The Antarctic Settlement of 1959', American Journal of International Law54: 349-371.
20.
Johnston, D. M.
(ed.) (1982) Arctic Ocean Issues in the 1980's. Honolulu: Law of the Sea Institute, University of Hawaii.
21.
Joyner, C. C.
(1981) `The Exclusive Economic Zone and Antarctica', Virginia Journal of International Law21: 691-725.
22.
Joyner, C. C.
(1988) `The Exclusive Economic Zone and Antarctica: The Dilemmas of Non-Sovereign Jurisdiction', Ocean Development and International Law19: 469-491.
23.
Karev, S. N.
(1991) `Cooperative Momentum? The Antarctic Treaty System and the Prevention of Conflict', in A. Jorgensen-Dahl and W. Ostreng (eds) The Antarctic Treaty System in World Politics, pp. 372-377. London: Macmillan.
24.
Luton, G.
(1986) `Strategic Issues in the Arctic Region', in E. M. Borgese and N. Ginsburg (eds) Ocean Yearbook, pp. 399-416. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
25.
Nicol, S.
(1991) `CCAMLR and Its Approaches to Management of the Krill Fishery', Polar Record27: 229-236.
26.
Nicol, S.
(1992) `Management of the Krill Fishery: Was CCAMLR Slow to Act?', Polar Record28: 155-157.
27.
Osherenko, G.
and Young, O. R. (1989) The Age of the Arctic: Hot Conflicts and Cold Realities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Ostreng, W.
(1989) `Polar Science and Politics: Close Twins or Opposite Poles in International Cooperation?', in S. Andresen and W. Ostreng (eds) International Resource Management: the Role of Science and Politics, pp. 88-113. London: Belhaven.
29.
Pharand, D.
(1992) `The Case for an Arctic Region Council and a Treaty Proposal', Revue generale de droit23: 163-195.
30.
Purver, R.
(1984) `Security and Arms Control at the Poles', International Journal39: 888-910.
31.
Rey, L.
(1987) `The Arctic: Mankind's Unique Heritage and Common Responsibility', Arctic and Alpine Research19(4): 345-350.
32.
Roginko, A. Y.
and LaMourie, M. J. (1992) `Emerging Marine Environmental Protection Strategies for the Arctic', Marine Policy16: 259-276.
33.
Rolston, S. J.
and McDorman, T. L. (1988) `Maritime Boundary Making in the Arctic Region', in D. M. Johnston and P. M. Saunders (eds) Ocean Boundary Making: Regional Issues and Developments, pp. 16-73. London: Croom Helm.
34.
Rothwell, D. R.
(1993) `The Canadian-U.S. Northwest Passage Dispute: A Reassessment', Cornell International Law Journal26: 401-441.
35.
Stokke, O. S.
(1991) `The Relevance of the Antarctic Treaty System as a Model for International Cooperation', in A. Jorgensen-Dahl and W. Ostreng (eds) The Antarctic Treaty System in World Politics, pp. 357-371. Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
36.
Theutenberg, B. J.
(1988) `Development and Cooperation in the Arctic', in K. Mottola (ed.) The Arctic Challenge: Nordic and Canadian Approaches to Security and Cooperation in an Emerging International Region, pp. 303-316. Boulder, CO: Westview.
37.
Waldock, C. H. M.
(1948) `Disputed Sovereignty in the Falkland Islands Dependencies', British Yearbook of International Law25: 311-353.
38.
Watts, A.
(1992) International Law and the Antarctic Treaty System. Cambridge: Grotius.
39.
Woolcott, R. A.
(1986) `The Interaction Between the Antarctic Treaty System and the United Nations System', in Antarctic Treaty System: An Assessment, pp. 375-390. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
40.
Young, O. R.
(1986) `The Age of the Arctic', Oceanus29(1): 9-17.
41.
Young, O. R.
(1989) `The Politics of International Regime Formation: Managing Natural Resources and the Environment', International Organization43: 349-375.
42.
Zumberge, J. H.
(1986) `The Antarctic Treaty as a Scientific Mechanism — The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research and the Antarctic Treaty System', in Antarctic Treaty System: An Assessment, pp. 153-168. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
