The English school in the study of international relations is characterized by its interest in `international society', i.e. a society formed by and of states developing rules and institutions for the conduct of their relations. This perspective has held a promise of overcoming the dichotomies of realist-liberalist and historical-structural approaches. Thereby it opened up for potential studies of for instance the relative weight of systemic (structural and constant) pressures relative to historical peculiarities in the evolution of different systems of states; the interplay between international society and a `world society' of mankind; and characterization of the different logics of international relations in different epochs. Reviewing three recent and prominent publications from the `school', it seems that although the books each on their own make valuable contributions to International Relations, development of theory of international society is not a very dynamic business. A plea is made for an opening of the — too English? — school towards parallel American interest in `regimes', towards semioticians' insight into the nature and implications of `sharing language', and towards historically focused studies in classical political theory and international law. In particular, the books on nationalism (James Mayall) and Hugo Grotius (Hedley Bull et al.) offer promising examples of this.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alker, H. R.
(1990) `Rescuing “Reason” from the “Rationalists”: Reading Vico, Marx and Weber as Reflective Institutionalists', Millennium19(2): 161-185.
2.
Ashley, R. K.
(1989) `Imposing International Purpose: Notes on a Problematic of Governance', in E.-O. Czempiel and J. N. Rosenau (eds) Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges, pp. 251-290, Lexington, MA.
3.
Ashley, R. K.
(forthcoming) Statecraft as Mancraft.
4.
Brandt, P. A.
(1988) `Det semiotiske grundforhold', in A. M. Dinesen and K. G. Jøregensen (eds) Subjektivitet og Intersubjektivitet. Aalborg: Nordic Summer University Book 28: 7-16.
5.
Bull, H.
(1966) `International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach', World Politics18.
6.
Bull, H.
(1976) `Martin Wight and the Theory of International Relations: The Second Martin Wight Memorial Lecture', British Journal of International Studies2: 101-116.
7.
Bull, H.
(1977a) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Macmillan: London.
8.
Bull, H.
(1977b) `Introduction: Martin Wight and the Study of International Relations', in M. Wight Systems of States, pp. 1-20. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
9.
Bull, H.
(1979) `The State's Positive Role in World Affairs', Dœdalus108(4).
10.
Bull, H.
and Watson, A. (1984) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
Butterfield, Herbert
(1975) `Raison d'Etat', Martin Wight Memorial Lecture, University of Sussex.
12.
Buzan, B.
(1991) People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd edn.Hemel Hempstead: Wheatsheaf.
13.
Buzan, B.
(1992) `The Evolution of International Society'. Paper for the Annual Conference of European Political Consortium, April.
14.
Buzan, B.
, Little, R. and Jones, C. (forthcoming) The Logic of Anarchy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15.
Carr, E. H.
(1981) (1939) The Twenty Years' Crisis 1919-1939. London: Macmillan Papermac.
16.
Clark, I.
(1989) The Hierarchy of States, 2nd edn.Cambridge: BISA/Cambridge University Press.
17.
Craig, G. A.
and George, A. L. (1983) Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Times. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Czempiel, E.-O.
(1991) `Einmischung ist möglich', Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 20 July 1991.
19.
Der Derian, J.
(1987) On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
Egido, José Puente
(1984) `Natural Law' in Encyclopedia of Public International Law, under the direction of Rudolph Bernhardt. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: North-Holland P.C., Vol. 7: 344-349.
21.
Grader, S.
(1988) `The English School of International Relations: Evidence and Evaluation', Review of International Studies14(1): 29-44.
22.
Grewe, W. G.
(1988) Epochen der volkerrechtsgeschichte, 2nd edn.Baden-Baden: Nomos.
23.
Grotius, H.
(1901 [1625]) The Rights of War and Peace. Washington DC: M. W. Dunne.
24.
James, A.
(1986) Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of International Society. London: Allen and Unwin.
25.
Jones, R. E.
(1981) `The English School of International Relations: a Case for Closure', Review of International Studies7(1): 1-12.
26.
Keohane, R.
(1989) International Institutions and State Power. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
Keohane, R.
and Nye, J. (1987) `Power and Interdependence revisited', International Organization41(4): 725-753.
28.
Kissinger, H. A.
(1957 [1977]) A World Restored: Castlereagh, Matternich and the Restoration of Peace 1812-1822. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
Krasner, S. D. (ed.) (1982) `International Regimes'. A special issue of International Organization36(2).
30.
Kratochwil, F.
(1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Kratochwil, F.
and Ruggie, J. G. (1989) `International Organization: A State of the Art on the Art of the State', International Organization40(4): 753-776.
32.
Linklater, A.
(1990b [1982]) Men and Citizens in International Relations, 2nd edn.London: Macmillan.
33.
Lotman, Y. M.
(1990) Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
34.
Manning, C. A. W.
(1957) `Varieties of Worldly Wisdom', World Politics9(2): 149-165.
35.
Manning, C. A. W.
(1962) The Nature of International Society. London: London School of Economics.
36.
Mayall, J.
(1991) `Non-intervention, Self-determination and the “New World Order” ', International Affairs67(3): 421-430.
37.
Miller, A. J.
(1983) `The Role of Deviance in World International Society', Millennium: Journal of International Studies12(3): 244-259.
38.
Morgenthau, H. J.
(1978 [1947]) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 5th rev. edn.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
39.
Neumann, I. B.
and Welsh, J. M. (forthcoming) `The Other in European Self-Definition: An Addendum to the Literature on International Society', Review of International Studies17.
40.
Nye, J.
(1988) `Neorealism and Neoliberalism', World Politics40(2): 235-251.
41.
Oakeshott, M.
(1990 [1975]) On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon.
42.
Rengger, N. J.
(1988) `Serpents and Doves in Classical International Theory', Millennium17(2): 215-226.
43.
Roberts, A.
(1991) International Affairs67(3).
44.
Ruggie, J. G.
(1983) `Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neo-realist Synthesis', World Politics35: 261-285.
45.
Suganami, H.
(1989) The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Walker, R. B. J.
(1989) `Ethics, Modernity and the Theory of International Relations', working paper, Princeton University, CA.
47.
Walker, R. B. J.
(1992) Inside/Outside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Watson, A.
(1990) `Systems of States', Review of International Studies16(2): 99-110.
49.
Wight, M.
(1960/1966) `Why Is There No International Theory?', in H. Butterfield and M. Wight (eds) Diplomatic Investigations, pp. 17-34. London: George Allen and Unwin.
50.
Wight, M.
(1966) `Western Values in International Theory?', in H. Butterfield and M. Wight (eds) Diplomatic Investigations. London: George Allen and Unwin.
51.
Wight, M.
(1977) Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
52.
Wight, M.
(1987) `An Anatomy of International Thought', Review of International Studies13.
53.
Wilson, P.
(1989) `The English School of International Relations: a Reply to Sheila Grader', Review of International Studies15(1): 49-58.
54.
Wæver, O.
(1989) `Beyond the “Beyond” of Critical International Theory'. Paper for the (B)ISA conference, London March-April 1989. Can be identified as Working Paper 1989/1 of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Research, Copenhagen.
55.
Wæver, O.
(1991) Introduktion til studiet af international politik. Copenhagen: Forlaget Politiske Studier.
56.
Wæver, O.
(1992) `International Society: The Grammar of Dialogue among States?' Paper for the Annual Conference of European Political Consortium, April.
57.
Wæver, O.
(forthcoming) `The Structure of Neo-realism', under review.
58.
Watson, A.
(1987) `Hedley Bull, States and Systems and International Societies', Review of International Studies13(2): 147-153.
