What's Left for the MFA? Foreign Policy and the Management of External Relations in Norway

Abstract

How and to what extent could the participation of "domestic" branches of government in the management of external relations affect the substance of foreign policy? Arguing that in order to answer this question we need to know not only how much but also more precisely what is now being handled by these agencies, the author attempts to map the participation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and "domestic" agencies in the management of Norway's external relations. The events data analysis reported in this article indicates that their roles are different in substantive profile: "Domestic" agencies are more narrowly specialized in terms of the kinds of problems they address, more "parochial" in their heavy concentration on relations to close neighbors, and relatively more preoccupied with issues affecting interests rather than values and some specific domestic subgroup(s) rather than the nation at large. "Sector" agencies seem to differ in several respects from those responsible for public goods or services and general regulation of society. In a concluding section the author argues that this particular pattern of differentiation implies a risk of "vertical disintegration" of foreign policy — threatening, in particular, bold or visionary policies with a perspective beyond immediate self-interest.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allison, G.T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis . Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

Allison, G.T. & Szanton, P. 1976. Remaking Foreign Policy: The Organizational Connection . New York: Basic Books.

Bergsten, C.F. 1976. Interdependence and the Reform of International Institutions . International Organization 30, 361-372.

Callahan, P. , Brady, L. P. & Hermann, M. G. (eds.) 1982. Describing Foreign Policy Behavior. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Cameron, D.R. 1978. The Expansion of the Public Economy. American Political Science Review 72, 1243-1261.

Christensen, J.G. 1981. Blurring the International-Domestic Politics Distinction: Danish Representation at EC Negotiations. Scandinavian Political Studies 4, 191-208.

Damgaard, E. 1986. Causes, Forms, and Consequences of Sectoral Policy-making: Some Danish Evidence. European Journal of Political Research 14, 273-287.

East, M.A. 1981. The Organizational Impact of Interdependence on Foreign Policy: The Case of Norway, pp. 137-161 in C. W. Kegley & P. McGowan (eds.) The Political Economy of Foreign Policy Behavior. Beverly Hills: Sage. (Sage International Yearbook of Foreign Policy Studies, vol. 6.)

Efjestad, S. 1980. Utenriksdepartementets rolle i samordningen av fagdepartementenes internasjonale saker. Unpublished cand. polit. thesis, University of Oslo.

10.

Egeberg, M. 1978. Internasjonaliseringen av offentlig politikk. Unpublished working paper, University of Bergen.

11.

Egeberg, M. 1981. Stat og organisasjoner. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

12.

Goldmann, K. 1986. "Democracy is Incompatible with International Politics ": Reconsideration of a Hypothesis, pp. 1-43 in K. Goldmann, S. Berglund & G. Sjøstedt, Democracy and Foreign Policy: The Case of Sweden. Aldershot: Gower.

13.

Halperin, M.H. 1974. Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

14.

Hermann, C.F. et al. 1973. CREON: A Foreign Events Data Set. Beverly Hills: Sage International Studies Series, 02-024.

15.

Hopkins, R.F. 1976. The International Role of "Domestic" Bureaucracy. International Organization 30, 405-432.

16.

Karvonen, L. & Sundelius, B. 1987. Internationalization and Foreign Policy Management. Aldershot: Gower.

17.

Katzenstein, P.J. 1975. International Interdependence: Some Long-term Trends and Recent Changes. International Organization 29, 1021-1034.

18.

Katzenstein, P.J. 1983. The Small European States in the International Economy: Economic Dependence and Corporatist Politics, pp. 91-130 in J. G. Ruggie (ed.) The Antinomies of Interdependence. New York, Columbia University Press.

19.

Keohane, R.O. & Nye, J.S. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

20.

Knudsen, O.F. & East, M.A. 1984. Leeway for Personal Impact: The Case of Foreign Policy-Making in Norway. Paper presented to the annual meetings of the Southern Section of the ISA, Raleigh, NC.

21.

Knudsen, O.F. & Underdal, A. 1985. Patterns of Norwegian Foreign Policy Behavior: An Exploratory Analysis. Cooperation and Conflict 20, 229-251.

22.

Morgenthau, H.J. 1948. Politics Among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knoph. (Pages refer to sixth edition, 1985).

23.

Morse, E.L. 1973 Foreign Policy and Interdependence in Gaullist France. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

24.

Riggs, R.E. & Mykletun, I.J. 1979. Beyond Functionalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, and Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

25.

Rosenau, J.N. 1961. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy. New York: Random House.

26.

Rosenau, J.N. 1984. A Pre-Theory Revisited: World Politics in an Era of Cascading Interdependence. International Studies Quarterly 28, 245-305.

27.

Steiner, Z. 1987. Decision-making in American and British Foreign Policy: an Open and Shut Case. Review of International Studies 13, 1-18.

28.

Stenelo, L.-G. 1984. The International Critic. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

29.

Sundelius, B. 1978. Managing Transnationalism in Northern Europe. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

30.

Sundelius, B. 1984. Interdependence, Internationalization and Foreign Policy Decentralization in Sweden. Cooperation and Conflict 19, 93-120.

31.

Underdal, A. 1979. Issues Determine Politics Determine Policies: The Case for a "Rationalistic" Approach to the Study of Foreign Policy Decision-Making . Cooperation and Conflict 14, 1-9.

32.

Underdal, A. 1980. Integrated Marine Policy — What? Why? How? Marine Policy 4, 159-169.

33.

Wallace, W. 1979. Old States and New Circumstances: The International Predicament of Britain, France and Germany, pp. 31-55 in W. Wallace & W. E. Paterson (eds.) Foreign Policy Making in Western Europe. Westmead: Saxon House.

34.

Walton, R.E. & McKersie, R.B. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill .