Coordinating Foreign Policy: The Changing Role of the Norwegian Foreign Ministry

Abstract

East, M. Coordinating Foreign Policy: The Changing Role of the Norwegian Foreign Ministry. Cooperation and Conflict, XIX, 1984, 121-134.

This is a study of foreign policy-making in Norway, focusing on the need for increased coordination in foreign policy-making brought about by interdependence. New actors, new issues, and increased interplay between domestic and international forces within a nation's foreign policy arena bring about an increased need for coordination both within the Foreign Ministry and between ministries. It is argued that in Norway, the Foreign Ministry has shown a relatively low level of effectiveness in dealing with several aspects of coordination. This is demonstrated by looking at government studies of the Foreign Ministry, examining the patterns of growth in the ministry — what offices grow and what do they do, and interviewing numerous foreign service officers. It is shown that the Foreign Ministry seems to have increased its capacity to deal with and respond to increased activity by the missions abroad. However, there is less evidence of effective attempts to improve coordination within the ministry or between the ministry and other government agencies. Interviews with foreign policy-makers inside and outside the Foreign Ministry reveal that Foreign Ministry personnel do not consider the problem of coordination to be serious. They feel that because there is good personal and informal contact between individuals in the government, the foundation is there to coordinate whenever this is necessary without more formal or institutional mechanisms. However, when carrying out interaction and communication analysis of other ministries dealing with foreign matters, it is revealed that much information does not reach the Foreign Ministry and that their input is not sought as frequently as foreign service personnel think it is.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aldrich, H. (1976). Resource Dependence and Interorganizational Relations , Administration and Society, 7, 4.

Braathu, J. (1982) ed. Coordinating Foreign Policy in the Nordic Countries, NUPI Report No. 70, Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs .

Colding, K. (1980). Norsk Utenriksadministrasjon, Mimeograph, 11 November 1980.

Dickerman, C.R. (1976). Transgovernmental Challenge and Response in Scandinavia and North America, International Organization, 30, 2 (Spring): 213-240.

Dons Report (1970). Instilling om utenrikstjenesten. Utenriksdepartementet, 27 February.

East, M. (1980). The Organizational Impact of Interdependence on Foreign Policy Making, pp. 137-161 in C. Kegley and P. McGowan , eds., The Political Economy of Foreign Policy Behavior, Sage Yearbook of Foreign Policy Studies, Vol. 6.

East, M. and L. Salomonsen (1981). Adapting Foreign Policy-Making to Interdependence: A Proposal and Some Evidence From Norway, Cooperation and Conflict, 16, 3: 165-182.

Efjestad, S. (1981). Utenriksdepartementets rolle i samordningen av fagdepartementenes internasjonale saker. Norsk utenrikspolitisk institutt, NUPI rapport 52 (Mars).

Hopkins, R. (1976). The International Role of 'Domestic' Bureaucracy , International Organization, 30, 3 (Summer): 405-432.

10.

Keokane, R. and J.S. Nye (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition , Boston: Little, Brown.

11.

Modalsli Report (1970). Instilling om den sentrale forvaltnings organisasjon, 15 May.

12.

Morse, E. (1970). The Transformation of Foreign Policies: Modernization, Interdependence and Externalization, World Politics, 22, 3 (April): 371-392.

13.

Salomonsen, L.H. (1981). Fagdepartementenes internasjonale virksomhet og UD's samordningsfunksjon. Hovedoppgave, Institut for statsvitenskap , Universitet i Oslo Høst.

14.

Sundelius, B. (1977). Transgovernmental Interactions in the Nordic Region , Cooperation and Conflict, 12. 2: 63-85.

15.

Ørvik, N. (1972). Departmental Decision-Making, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.