Status symbols have become a central focus in the second wave of research on international status. This article examines Chile’s transportation and display of a several-ton Antarctic iceberg at Expo ’92 in Seville as a strategic attempt to regain international standing after the Pinochet dictatorship. Drawing on archival and media sources, we show that the iceberg was designed to secure European recognition of Chile as a modern, civilized country while distancing it from stereotypical images of Latin America. Yet, rather than consolidating prestige, the display generated backlash at home and abroad. This resistance did not arise primarily from rationalistic concerns over cost, corruption, or deference—as identified in existing status-backlash literature—but from perceptions of identity misrepresentation: the sense that the iceberg projected an inauthentic or sanitized version of Chilean identity. The article advances status research in three ways. First, it introduces identity misrepresentation as a fourth mode of critique against status symbols. Second, it shows how enduring civilizational hierarchies shape status aspirations among smaller states in the Global South. Third, it highlights international exhibitions as an underexamined arena where states perform, contest, and negotiate status before multiple audiences.
Adler-NissenRZarakolA (2021) Struggles for recognition: The liberal international order and the merger of its discontents. International Organization75(2): 611–634.
2.
AguirreMT (1991) A la conquista del viejo mundo. Qué Pasa1039: 20–22.
3.
AizenbergE (1991) An iceberg bobs in the Latin imagination. The New York Times, 19November, New York.
AndermannJ (2009) Tournaments of value: Argentina and Brazil in the age of exhibitions. Journal of Material Culture14(3): 333–363.
8.
AveryM (2025) The international dimensions of the pinochet dictatorship. In: GonzálezFPremM (eds) The Pinochet Shock. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 119–150
9.
BasáezPAmadoriAM (1989) 1889-1989. El Pabellón De Chile En París 1889. Universidad de Chile.
10.
BeaumontPRørenP (2025) Status symbols in world politics. Cooperation and Conflict60(1): 3–26.
11.
BeaumontPPaesLDOMagliaC (2025) Prestige and punishment: Status symbols and the danger of white elephants. Cooperation and Conflict60(1): 166–192.
12.
BeaumontPD (2024) The Grammar of Status Competition: International Hierarchies and Domestic Politics. Oxford University Press.
13.
BenedictB (1981) World’s fairs and anthropology. Council for Museum Anthropology Newsletter5(2): 2–7.
14.
BenedictB (1983) The Anthropology of World’s Fairs: San Franscisco’s Panama Pacific International Exposition of 1915. Scolar Press.
15.
BrowningCS (2015) Nation Branding, National Self-Esteem, and the Constitution of Subjectivity in Late Modernity. Foreign Policy Analysis11(2): 195–214.
16.
BuzanB (2014) The “Standard of Civilisation” as an English School Concept. Millennium: Journal of International Studies42(3): 576–594.
17.
BuzanBLawsonG (2015) The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations (Cambridge studies in international relations 135). Cambridge University Press.
18.
BywatersC (2021) ¿El fin de la ‘política de Estado’? Eficiencia y democracia en el nuevo ciclo de la política exterior. In: BywatersC. CSepúlveda SotoDVillar GertnerA (eds) Nuevas voces de política exterior: Chile y el mundo en la era post-consensual. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 144–154.
19.
BywatersC (2023) Domestic politics, prestige, and war: The emergence of Chile’s democratic status narrative. Revista Brasileira De Política Internacional66(1): e006.
20.
BywatersC (2025) Perspectivas teóricas del estudio del estatus en las Relaciones Internacionales. Revista CIDOB D’afers Internacionals1: 149–171.
21.
BywatersC (2026) Chile’s Struggles for International Status and Domestic Legitimacy: Standing at the Liberal Order’s Edge. Routledge.
22.
BywatersCSepúlveda SotoDVillar GertnerA, et al. (2021) Nuevas Voces De Política Exterior: Chile Y El Mundo En La Era Post-consensual. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
23.
CarlsnaesW (1992) The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly36(3): 245–270.
24.
CarvalhoBde Costa LopezJLeiraH, et al. (2021) The Routledge Handbook of Historical International Relations. Routledge.
25.
Centro de Extensión UC (1992-1993) Exposición “Chile En Expo Sevilla 92” [Photograph]. Archivo Vicerrectoría de Comunicaciones / Archivo Fotográfico, Vicerrectoría de Comunicaciones. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
26.
Chagas-BastosFH (2024) The challenge for the ‘rest’: insertion, agency spaces and recognition in world politics. International Affairs100(1): 43–60.
de CarvalhoBNeumannIB (2015) Introduction: Small states and status. In: NeumannIBde CarvalhoB (eds) Small States and Status Seeking: Norway’s Quest for International Standing. London: Routledge, pp. 1–21.
DillonS (1992) Chile’s iceberg message: We’re both cool and efficient. Seattle Times. 26 April 1992.
36.
DorfmanA (1999) La Nana Y El Iceberg. Seix Barral.
37.
DümmerS (2012) Sin Tropicalismos Ni Exageraciones. La Construcción De La Imagen De Chile Para La Exposición Iberoamericana De Sevilla En 1929. RIL Editores.
38.
DuqueMG (2018) Recognizing international status: A relational approach. International Studies Quarterly62(3): 577–592.
FreisteinKMüllerT (2025) Capitalising on virtue: Global climate politics and the life cycle of status symbols. Cooperation and Conflict60(1): 120–144.
42.
FreitesAMartínez-VargasG (2025) La eficacia de la política exterior turquesa de Chile: ¿Liderazgo efectivo o conceptual?Estudios Internacionales57(211): 63–96.
43.
Fuentes-JulioC (2020) Norm entrepreneurs in foreign policy: How Chile became an international human rights promoter. Journal of Human Rights19(2): 256–274.
44.
Fuentes-JulioC (2021) Los derechos humanos en la política exterior de Chile: protagonismo, retrocesos y desafíos futuros. In: BywatersCSepúlveda SotoDVillar GertnerA (eds) Nuevas voces de política exterior: Chile y el mundo en la era post-consensual. Santiago: Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 108–119.
GallardoE (2025) Estatus internacional, medio ambiente y política exterior de Chile: la construcción del nicho diplomático ambiental como herramienta de prestigio en el orden internacional liberal (1990-2025). In: XI Jornadas de Estudios Internacionales (ed. Mancilla-AzargadoP.Toro-IbacacheL.), Santiago, Chile, n.p., September 24, 2025. University of Santiago, Chile.
47.
García MárquezG (1970) One Hundred Years of Solitude. Harper & Row Publishers.
48.
GiladyL (2018) The Price of Prestige: Conspicuous Consumption in International Relations. The University of Chicago Press.
49.
GongGW (1984) The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. 1st ed. Clarendon Press.
GreenhalghP (1988) Ephemeral Vistas: The Expositions Universelles, Great Exhibitions, and World’s Fairs, 1851-1939 (Studies in imperialism) Manchester University Press, St. Martin’s Press.
52.
HansenL (2012) Discourse analysis, poststructuralism and foreign policy. In: SmithSAHadfieldADunneT (eds) Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases, 2nd ed.Oxford University Press, pp. 94–112.
53.
HarveyP (1996) Hybrids of Modernity Anthropology, the Nation State and the Universal Exhibition. Routledge.
54.
HeineJ (1991) ¿Timidez O Pragmatismo? La Política Exterior De Chile En 1990. Working paper 21. Programa de Seguimiento de las Políticas Exteriores Latinoamericanas.
55.
HermannMG (2001) How decision units shape foreign policy: A theoretical framework. International Studies Review3(2): 47–81.
56.
Hernández GarcíaJR (2008) Transparencias que se derriten: el “iceberg” del 92 y la identidad chilena en la transición. El Amauta: 1–20.
57.
HirstMRussellRSanjuanAM, et al. (2024) América Latina y el Sur Global en tiempos sin hegemonías. Revista CIDOB D’afers Internacionals: 133–156.
58.
HudsonVM (2005) Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations: Foreign policy analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis1(1): 1–30.
59.
Jiménez-MartínezC (2017) Making Chile visible: Purposes, operationalisation and audiences from the perspective of nation branding practitioners. Geopolitics22(3): 502–524.
60.
KalayciogluESubotićJ (2025) Global politics of cultural heritage: Status, authority, and geopolitics. Review of International Studies First View:: 1–13.
61.
KnightJ (1992) Discovering the world in Seville: The 1992 universal exposition. Anthropology Today8(5): 20.
62.
KorowinE (2010) “Iceberg! Right Ahead!” (Re)Discovering Chile at the 1992 Universal Exposition in Seville, Spain. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture28(1): 48–63.
63.
LarraínJ (2001) Identidad Chilena. LOM Ediciones.
64.
LarsonDWShevchenkoA (2019) Quest for Status: Chinese and Russian Foreign Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press
65.
LeerssenJStormE (2022) Introduction: World’s fairs and the global imagination. In: LeerssenJStormE (eds) World Fairs and the Global Moulding of National Identities: International Exhibitions as Cultural Platforms, 1851-1958. Brill, pp. 1–12.
66.
LeiraHde CarvalhoB (2025) The importance of being civilized: Opera houses as status symbols in International Relations. Cooperation and Conflict60(1): 27–53.
LinAY-TKatadaSN (2022) Striving for greatness: status aspirations, rhetorical entrapment, and domestic reforms. Review of International Political Economy29(1): 175–201.
69.
MachucaG (2011) El Traje Del Emperador: Arte Y Recepción Pública En El Chile De Las Cuatro Últimas Décadas. Metales Pesados.
70.
MajlufN (1997) «Ce n’est pas le Pérou,» or, the failure of authenticity: marginal cosmopolitans at the Paris universal exhibition of 1855. Critical Inquiry23(4): 868–893. https://doi.org/10.1086/448857
71.
MatternJBZarakolA (2016) Hierarchies in world politics. International Organization70(3): 623–654.
PinedoJ (1996) Una metáfora de país: la discusión en torno a la presencia de Chile en el pabellón Sevilla 1992. In: OssandónC (ed.) Ensayismo Y Modernidad En América Latina. ARCIS—LOM, pp. 87–114.
79.
PouliotV (2016) International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.
80.
PuX (2019) Rebranding China: Contested Status Signaling in the Changing Global Order (Studies in Asian security). Stanford University Press.
81.
Punto Final (1991.) Untitled. Punto Final n.p. Available at: Biblioteca Histórica ProChile—Recortes de Prensa. 33CL 06.10 REC (2443)
82.
RemboldE (1999) Exhibitions and National Identity. National Identities1(3): 221–225.
83.
RhameyJPEarlyBR (2013) Going for the gold: Status-seeking behavior and Olympic performance. International Area Studies Review16(3): 244–261.
84.
RichardN (1998) Residuos Y Metáforas: Ensayos De Crítica Cultural Sobre El Chile De La Transición. 1st ed. Cuarto Propio.
85.
RocheM (1998) Mega-events, culture and modernity: Expos and the origins of public culture. International Journal of Cultural Policy5(1): 1–31.
86.
RydellRW (2002) All the World’s a Fair: Visions of Empire at American International Expositions, 1876 - 1916. University of Chicago Press.
87.
RydellRWGwinnNE (eds) (1994) Fair Representations: World’s Fairs and the Modern World. VU University Press.
88.
S.T. (1992) Expo Sevilla’92: La imagen ambiental que mostrará Chile. Ambiente Y Desarrollo, April.
89.
Sánchez GradosCA (2023) Del Centenario Al Bicentenario. La Presencia Del Perú En Las Exposiciones Internacionales: 1929 Y 2020 [Masters thesis, International University of Valencia]. Available at: https://renati.sunedu.gob.pe/handle/renati/6809
90.
SaundersEN (2024) The Insiders’ Game: How Elites Make War and Peace. Princeton University Press.
91.
SchulzC-A (2014) Civilisation, Barbarism and the Making of Latin America’s Place in 19th-Century International Society. Millennium: Journal of International Studies42(3): 837–859.
92.
SchulzC-AThiesCG (2023) Status cues and normative change: How the academy awards facilitated Chile’s gender identity law. Review of International Studies50: 1–19.
93.
SchusterS (2018) The world’s fairs as spaces of global knowledge: Latin American archaeology and anthropology in the age of exhibitions. Journal of Global History13(1): 69–93.
SubercaseauxB (1996) Chile, ¿un país moderno?Santiago: Ediciones B.
97.
Tenorio-TrilloM (1996) Mexico at the World’s Fairs: Crafting a Modern Nation. University of California Press.
98.
The New York Times (1991) Chile’s Chilly Idea. The New York Times, 8November.
99.
ThompsonWR (2014) Status conflict, hierarchies, and interpretation dilemmas. In: PaulTVLarsonDWWohlforthWC (eds) Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 219–245.
UslenghiA (2016) Latin America at Fin-de-siècle Universal Exhibitions: Modern Cultures of Visuality. Palgrave Macmillan.
103.
ValdésJG (1995) Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge University Press.
104.
van der ReeG (2009) Chile’s (Inter)national identities: Framing the relations with Bolivia and Peru. Bulletin of Latin American Research29(2): 208–223.
105.
van der WesthuizenJ (2021) Status signaling and the risk of domestic opposition: Comparing South Africa and Brazil’s hosting of the 2010 and 2014 world cups. Foreign Policy Analysis17(3): orab004.
106.
VidalS (2017) El Pabellón de Chile en Sevilla ‘92 desde tres casos abortados de artes visuales. Caiana11: 209–216.
107.
WardS (2022) Decline and disintegration: National status loss and domestic conflict in post-disaster Spain. International Security46(4): 91–129.
108.
WeberM (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (eds RothG.WittichC.). University of California Press.
109.
WehnerLE (2020) Chile’s soft misplaced regional identity. Cambridge Review of International Affairs33(4): 555–571.
110.
WehnerLEThiesCG (2014) Role theory, narratives, and interpretation: The domestic contestation of roles. International Studies Review16(3): 411–436.
111.
WohlforthW (2025) The irony of prestige: Status-seeking as rational choice. Cooperation and Conflict60(1): 193–209.
112.
WohlforthWCde CarvalhoBLeiraH, et al. (2017) Moral authority and status in International Relations: Good states and the social dimension of status seeking. Review of International Studies44(3): 526–546.
113.
ZarakolA (2011) After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West (Cambridge studies in international relations 118). Cambridge University Press.
