This forum discusses and celebrates the career and impact of Jens Bartelson in and on Nordic academic International Relations. Through engagement with his central works and concepts, the contributions highlight the intellectual impact and development of Bartelson’s work over three decades.
AbrahamsenRDroletJFGheciuA, et al. (2020) Confronting the international political sociology of the new right. International Political Sociology14(1): 94–107.
2.
Adler-NissenRZarakolA (2021) Struggles for recognition: The liberal international order and the merger of its discontents. International Organization75(2): 611–634.
3.
BartelsonJ (1995) A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
4.
BartelsonJ (2001) The Critique of the State. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511490170
5.
BartelsonJ (2009) Visions of World Community. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BartelsonJ (2010) The social construction of globality. International Political Sociology4(3): 219–235.
7.
BartelsonJ (2014) Sovereignty as Symbolic Form. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315774909
8.
BartelsonJ (2018) War in International Thought. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BartelsonJ (2023a) Becoming International. Cambridge University Press.
10.
BartelsonJ (2023b) Cosmologies of conquest: The renaissance foundations of modern international thought. Review of International Studie [Online First].
11.
BartelsonJ (2024) Of selves and others. In: LeiraHShams LahijaniAWigenE (eds) Uses of Iver Neumann: Nothing International is Alien. Routledge, pp. 12–22.
12.
BartelsonJJacksonPT (2020) Introduction: Forum on adom Getachew’s ‘Worldmaking After Empire’. Millennium: Journal of International Studies48(3): 334–339.
13.
ConnollW (1999) Why I am Not a Secularist. Duke University Press, 1999.
14.
de CarvalhoBLeiraHHobsonJM (2011) The big bangs of IR: The myths that your teachers still tell you about 1648 and 1919. Millennium39(3): 735–758. DOI: 10.1177/0305829811401459
15.
DroletJ-FWilliamsMC (2018) Radical conservatism and global order: International theory and the new right. International Theory10(3): 285–313. DOI: 10.1017/S175297191800012X
16.
EngströmM (2014) Contemporary Russian messianism and new Russian foreign policy. Contemporary Security Policy35(3): 356–379.
17.
GouldHDOnufN (1997) And archaeology of sovereignty. Mershon International Studies Review41(2): 330–332.
18.
GötzEStaunJ (2022) Why Russia attacked Ukraine: Strategic culture and radicalized narratives. Contemporary Security Policy43(3): 482–497.
19.
HolmMSendingOJ (2018) States before relations: On misrecognition and the Bifurcated regime of sovereignty. Review of International Studies44(5): 829–847. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210518000372
20.
JoasHKnöblW (2013) War in Social Thought: Hobbes to the Present. Princeton University Press.
21.
MaleševićS (2010) The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge University Press.
22.
MaleševićS (2017) The rise of Organised Brutality: A Historical Sociology of Violence. Cambridge University Press.
23.
MälksooM (2023) The postcolonial moment in Russia’s War against Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research25(3–4): 471–481. DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947
24.
ParisR (2020) The right to dominate: How old ideas about sovereignty pose new challenges for world order. International Organization74(3): 453–489. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818320000077
SöderbaumFSpandlerKPacciardiA (2021) Contestations of the liberal international order: A populist script of regional cooperation. Elements in international relations. DOI: 10.1017/9781009030915
27.
StrachanH (2013) The Direction of War: Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
28.
ThomasM (2024) The End of Empires and a World Remade: A Global History of Decolonization. Princeton University Press.
29.
ThomasP (2004) The critique of the State by Jens Bartelson. Political Theory32(6): 877–881.
30.
VolkC (2022) The problem of sovereignty in globalized times. Law, Culture and the Humanities18(3): 716–738. DOI: 10.1177/1743872119828010
31.
ZhangC (2020) Right-wing populism with Chinese characteristics? Identity, otherness and global imaginaries in debating world politics online. European Journal of International Relations26(1): 88–115. DOI:10.1177/1354066119850253
