AgathangelouAMLingLHM (2009) Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds. London and New York: Routledge.
2.
BuegerC (2012) From epistemology to practice: a sociology of science for international relations. Journal of International Relations & Development15(1): 97–109.
3.
ChanS (2010) The End of Certainty: Towards a New Internationalism. London and New York: Zed Books.
4.
GrovoguiSN (2007) Postcolonialism. In: DunneTKurkiMSmithS (eds) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–246.
5.
Hamati-AtayaI (2011) Contemporary “Dissidence” in American IR: the new structure of Anti-Mainstream Scholarship?International Studies Perspectives12(4): 362–398.
6.
HoffmannS (1977) An American social science: international relations. Daedalus106(3): 41–60.
7.
KristensenPM (2012) Dividing discipline: structures of communication in international relations. International Studies Review14(1): 32–50.
8.
NayakMSelbinE (2010) Decentering International Relations. London and New York: Zed Books.
9.
SchmidtBC (1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
10.
ShilliamR (ed.) (2011) International Relations and Non-Western Thought: Imperialism, Colonialism and Investigations of Global Modernity. London and New York: Routledge.
11.
TicknerAB (2013) Core, periphery and (neo)imperialist international relations. European Journal of International Relations19(3): 627–646.
12.
WæverO (1998) The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization52(4): 687–727.