In this rejoinder we appreciate Ben Rosamond and Alex Warleigh-Lack’s addition to our typology of dialogues, yet restate our main reasons to remain sceptical about the outcome of a dialogue between European Studies and New Regionalism.
GehringTOberthurS (2009) The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. European Journal of International Relations15: 125–156.
2.
JonesRE (1982) The English School of international relations: a time for closure. Review of International Studies7: 1–13.
3.
JørgensenKEValbjørnM (2012) Four dialogues and the funeral of a beautiful relationship: European studies and the new regionalism. Cooperation and Conflict47: 3–27.
4.
LegroJMoravcsikA (1999) Is anyone still a realist?International Security24(2): 5–55.
5.
RosamondBWarleigh-LackA (2013) ‘Greatly Exaggerated’: the death of EU Studies-New Regionalism Dialogue? A reply to Jørgensen and Valbjørn. Cooperation and Conflict48: 542–555.
6.
WendtA (2004) Why a world state is inevitable. European Journal of International Relations9: 491–542.
