What happens when a new government enters office? A comparison of ideological change in British and Swedish foreign policy 1991

Abstract

This study analyses to what extent a change of government in times of unchanged international structure affects the ideology of foreign policy. The main contribution is to investigate the role of political culture, as reflected through institutional design, as an intervening variable. Effects of changes of government in the United Kingdom in 1997 and 2010 and in Sweden in 1994 and 2006 is studied by analysing speeches in the General Debates of the UN General Assembly. The analysis is based on four ideal types. The results indicate that institutional design is an influencing intervening variable of foreign policy ideology. In the UK, a country dominated by majoritarian institutional design, foreign policy ideology changes more extensively in times of government change than in Sweden, a country dominated by consensual institutional design.

Keywords

foreign policy government change ideology Sweden United Kingdom

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Af Ugglas

(1991) Anförande av utrikesminister Margaretha af Ugglas i FN:s Generalförsamlings 46:e sessions allmänna debatt [Statement of Foreign Minister Margaretha af Ugglas at the General Debate of the 46th Session of the UN General Assembly]. New York: Permanent mission of Sweden to the United Nations.

Af Ugglas

(1992) Anförande av utrikesminister Margaretha af Ugglas i FN:s Generalförsamlings 46:e sessions allmänna debatt [Statement of Foreign Minister Margaretha af Ugglas at the General Debate of the 46th Session of the UN General Assembly]. New York: Permanent mission of Sweden to the United Nations.

Af Ugglas

(1993) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/48/PV.7), 8 October.

Blair

(1998) Statement of the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/53/PV.7), 21 September.

Brown

(2009) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/64/PV.3), 23 September.

Cameron

(2011) Statement at the UN General Assembly, 22 September 2011. Available at: http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/news/latest-news/?id=659927482&;view=PressS (accessed 4 May 2012).

Clegg

(2010) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/10999), 24 September.

Cook

(1997) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/52/PV.7), 22 September.

Cook

(1999) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/54/PV.5), 20 September.

10.

Freivalds

(2005) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/60/PV.10), 17 September.

11.

Hjelm-Wallén

(1994) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/49/PV.27), 11 October.

12.

Hjelm-Wallén

(1995) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/50/PV.10), 28 September.

13.

Hurd

(1994) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/49/PV.8), 28 September.

14.

Lidén

(2006) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/61/PV.22), 27 September.

15.

Lidén

(2007) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/62/PV.15), 2 October.

16.

Miliband

(2007) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/62/PV.9), 27 September.

17.

Persson

(2004) Statement by his excellency Mr. Göran Persson, Prime Minister of Sweden, in the General Debate of the 59th Regular Session of the General Assembly of the United Nations, 21 September 2004. Available at: www.swedenabroad.com/Page____26589.aspx (accessed 20 March 2012).

18.

Rifkind

(1995) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/50/PV.6), 26 September.

19.

Rifkind

(1996) Statement at the UN General Assembly. Official records of the General Debate in the UN General Assembly (GA/A/51/PV.6), 24 September.

20.

Allison

Zelikow

(1999) Essence of Decision – Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

21.

Barnett

(1999) Culture, strategy, and foreign policy change: Israel’s road to Oslo. European Journal of International Relations 5: 5–36.

22.

Berman

(1998) The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23.

Bjereld

Demker

(2000) Foreign policy as battlefield: a study of national interest and party motives. Scandinavian Political Studies 23: 17–36.

24.

Breuning

(2007) Foreign Policy Analysis – A Comparative Introduction. New York: Palgrave.

25.

Brommesson

(2007) Från Hanoi till Bryssel. Moralsyn i svensk deklarerad utrikespolitik 1969–1996 [From Hanoi to Brussels – Moral Beliefs in Swedish Declared Foreign Policy 1969–1996]. Stockholm: Santérus.

26.

Brommesson

(2010) Normative Europeanization – the case of Swedish foreign policy reorientation. Cooperation and Conflict 45: 224–244.

27.

Bull

(1991) Martin Wight and the theory of international relations. In: Wight

(ed.) International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press, pp. ix–xxvii.

28.

Bulley

(2009) Ethics as Foreign Policy – Britain, the EU and the Other. London: Routledge.

29.

Buzan

(2001) The English school – an underexploited resource in IR. Review of International Studies 27: 471–488.

30.

Buzan

(2004) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Campbell

(1998) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

32.

Carlsnaes

(2002) Foreign policy. In: Carlsnaes

Risse

Simmons

(eds) Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE, pp. 331–349.

33.

Carlsnaes

Guzzini

(2011) (eds) Foreign Policy Analysis. London: SAGE.

34.

Checkel

(1993) Ideas, institutions and the Gorbachev foreign policy revolution. World Politics 41: 271–300.

35.

Checkel

(1997) Ideas and International Political Change: Soviet/Russian Behaviour and the End of the Cold War. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.

36.

Demker

(1997) Changing party ideology: Gaullist parties facing voters, leaders and competitors. Party Politics 3: 407–426.

37.

Demker

(1998) A magic moment in Swedish foreign policy: voting YES to Algerian self-determination in 1959. Cooperation and Conflict 33: 130–151.

38.

Demker

Malmström

(1999) Ingenmansland (No Man’s Land). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

39.

Detterbeck

(2005) Cartel parties in Western Europe? Party Politics 11: 173–191.

40.

Doeser

(2008) In Search of Security after the Collapse of the Soviet Union – Foreign Policy Change in Denmark, Finland and Sweden, 1988–1993. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola.

41.

Doeser

(2011) Domestic politics and foreign policy change in small states: the fall of the Danish ‘footnote policy’. Cooperation and Conflict 46: 222–241.

42.

Doty

(1996) Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

43.

Ekengren

A-M

(2010) How ideas influence decision-making: Olof Palme and Swedish foreign policy 1965–1975. Scandinavian Journal of History 36(2): 117–134.

44.

Elder

Thomas

Arter

(1982) The Consensual Democracies? The Governments and Politics of the Scandinavian States. Oxford: Robertsons.

45.

Elgström

(2000) Norm negotiations: the construction of new norms regarding gender and development in EU foreign aid policy. Journal of European Public Policy 7: 457–476.

46.

Gerth

Wright Mills

(1948) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. The International Library of Sociology. New York: Routledge.

47.

Goldmann

(1988) The concept of “Realism” as a source of confusion. Cooperation and Conflict 23: 1–14.

48.

Goldstein

Keohane

(1993a) (eds) Ideas and Foreign policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

49.

Goldstein

Keohane

(1993b) Ideas and foreign policy: an analytical framework. In: Goldstein

Keohane

(eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 3–30.

50.

Gustavsson

(1998) The Politics of Foreign Policy Change: Explaining the Swedish Reorientation in EC Membership. Lund: Lund University Press.

51.

Hagan

(1989) Domestic political regime changes and third world voting realignments in the United Nations, 1946–84. International Organization 43(3): 505–541.

52.

Hancock

(2010) Woodrow Wilson revisited: human rights discourse in the foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration. European Journal of International Relations 16: 57–76.

53.

Hekman

(1983) Weber, the Ideal Type and Contemporary Social Theory. Notre Dame, IN and London: Notre Dame University Press.

54.

Holsti

K J

(1982) Why Nations Realign: Foreign Policy in the Postwar World. Boston: Allen & Unwin.

55.

Houghton

(2007) Reinvigorating the study of foreign policy decision making: toward a constructivist approach. Foreign Policy Analysis 3: 24–45.

56.

Hudson

(2005) Foreign policy analysis: actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 1–30.

57.

Hudson

(2007) Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

58.

Hunt

(1987) Ideology and U.S. Foreign Policy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

59.

Jerneck

Sannerstedt

Sjölin

(1988) Internationalization and parliamentary decision-making: the case of Sweden 1970–1985. Scandinavian Political Studies 11(3): 169–194.

60.

Kaarbo

(1996) Power and influence in foreign policy decision making: the role of junior coalition partners in German and Israeli foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly 40(4): 501–530.

61.

Kaarbo

(2012) Coalition Politics and Cabinet Decision Making: A Comparative Analyses of Foreign Policy Choices. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.

62.

Kesgin

Kaarbo

(2010) When and how parliaments influence foreign policy: the case of Turkey’s Iraq decision. International Studies Perspectives 11: 19–36.

63.

Koivula

Sipilä

(2011) Missing in action? EU crisis management and the link to the domestic political debate. Cooperation and Conflict 46: 521–542.

64.

Kubalkovas

(2001) Foreign Policy in a Constructed World. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

65.

Larsen

(1997) Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe. London: Routledge.

66.

Larsson

(1997) Trust and missed opportunities in international relations. Political Psychology 18: 701–734.

67.

LeBlang

Chan

(2003) Explaining wars fought by established democracies: do institutional constraints matter. Political Research Quarterly 56: 385–400.

68.

Legro

(2005) Rethinking the World: Great Power Strategies and International Order. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

69.

Lijphart

(1999) Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

70.

Linklater

Suganami

(2006) The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

71.

Lödén

(2012) Reaching a vanishing point? Reflections on the future of neutrality norms in Sweden and Finland. Cooperation and Conflict 47: 271–284.

72.

McDermott

(2001) Risk-Taking in International Politics: Prospect Theory in American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

73.

McDermott

(2002) Arms control and the first reagan administration: belief systems and policy choices. Journal of Cold War Studies 4: 29–59.

74.

Meernik

Oldmixon

(2008) The president, the senate, and the costs of internationalism. Foreign Policy Analysis 4: 187–206.

75.

Miles

(1998) Sweden and the intergovernmental conference: testing the “Membership Diamond”. Cooperation and Conflict 33: 339–366.

76.

Miles

(2000) (ed.) Sweden and the European Union Evaluated. London: Continuum.

77.

Mintz

DeRouen

Jr (2010) Understanding Foreign Policy Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

78.

Möller

Bjereld

(2010) From nordic neutrals to post-neutral Europeans: differences in Finnish and Swedish policy transformation. Cooperation and Conflict 45: 363–386.

79.

Moon

(1985) Consensus or Compliance? Foreign Policy Change and External Dependence. International Organization 39: 29–328.

80.

Norberg

(2008) Ideologiska mål och utrikesdebatt. Svenska riksdagspartiers argumentation i Vietnam- och Irakfrågan [Ideological Goals and Foreign Policy Debate. The Argumentation of Swedish Parliamentary Parties on the Wars in Vietnam and Iraq]. Umeå: Umeå universitet.

81.

Ozkececi-Taner

(2005) The impact of institutionalized ideas in coalition foreign policy making: Turkey as an example, 1991–2002. Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 249–278.

82.

Parsons

(2002) Showing ideas as causes: the origins of the European Union. International Organization 56: 47–84.

83.

Peters

(1999) Institutional Theory in Political Science: The ‘New Institutionalism’. London: Continuum.

84.

Riegert

(1998) “Nationalising” Foreign Conflict: Foreign Policy Orientation as a Factor in Television News Reporting. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.

85.

Risse-Kappen

(1994) Ideas do not float freely: transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war. International Organization 48: 185–214.

86.

Rosati

(2000) The power of human cognition in the study of world politics. International Studies 2: 45–75.

87.

Scharf

Williams

(2010) Shaping Foreign Policy in Times of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

88.

Schelling

(1981) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

89.

Sikkink

(1991) Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

90.

Smith

Hadfield

Dunne

(2007) Introduction. In: Smith

Hadfield

Dunne

(eds) Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–8.

91.

Tallberg

(2004) The power of the presidency: brokerage, efficiency, and distribution in EU negotiations. Journal of Common Market Studies 42: 999–1022.

92.

Tallberg

(2008) Bargaining power in the European council. Journal of Common Market Studies 46: 685–708.

93.

Van Der Heiden

(2010) Urban Foreign Policy and Domestic Dilemmas: Insights from Swiss and EU City-regions. Colchester: ECPR Press.

94.

Waever

(2004) Identity, communities and foreign policy: discourse analysis as foreign policy theory. In: Waever

Hansen

(eds) European Integration and National Identity: The Challenge of the Nordic States. New York: Routledge, pp. 20–49.

95.

Westberg

(2003) Den nationella drömträdgården. Den stora berättelsen om den egna nationen i svensk och brittisk Europadebatt [The National Dreamgarden: The Great Story on the Nation in Swedish and British Debate on Europe]. Stockholm: Stockholm University.

96.

Wheeler

Dunne

(1998) Good international citizenship: a third way for British foreign policy. International Affairs 74: 847–870.

97.

Widfeldt

(1996) Sweden and the European Union: implications for the Swedish party system. In: Miles

(ed.) The European Union and the Nordic Countries. London: Routledge, pp. 99–114.

98.

Wight

(1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press.

99.

Williams

(2004) Who’s making UK foreign policy? International Affairs 80: 909–929.

100.

Zannakis

(2009) Climate Policy as a Window of Opportunity. Sweden and Global Change. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.

What happens when a new government enters office? A comparison of ideological change in British and Swedish foreign policy 1991–2011

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References