Based on a comprehensive survey conducted in 2009, this article analyses similarities and differences in the policy-shaping activities of all 27 European Union member states in the day-to-day policy-making process of the EU. It shows that some states participate more actively in EU working parties and the COREPER than others. Do bigger states use negotiation strategies more frequently than smaller states? Do the available capacities crucially influence how frequently a delegation employs negotiation strategies in a particular policy field? The article develops a set of willingness- and capacity-related hypotheses and tests them using qualitative and quantitative methods. It shows that small states can surmount size-related difficulties most importantly through the accumulation of expertise. Thus, size is what states make of it. Small states are neither per se political dwarfs nor power-brokers.
AndersenS. S.EliassenK. A. (1991) ‘European Community Lobbying’, European Journal of Political Research20: 173–87.
2.
ArterD. (2000) ‘Small State Influence within the EU: The Case of Finland’s “Northern Dimension Initiative”’, Journal of Common Market Studies38: 677–97.
3.
BailerS. (2004) ‘Bargaining Success in the European Union’, European Union Politics5: 99–123.
4.
BeyersJ.DierrickxG. (1998) ‘The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations?’ Journal of Common Market Studies36: 289–317.
5.
BeyersJ.KerremansB.BursensP. (2001) ‘Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg: Diversity Among the Benelux Countries’, in ZeffEleanor E.PirroEllen B. (eds) The Euopean Union and the Member States. Cooperation, Coordination, and Compromise, 59–88. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
6.
BeyersJ.TrondalJ. (2004) ‘How Nation States ‘Hit’ Europe. Ambiguity and Representation in the European Union’, West European Politics27: 919–42.
7.
BjörkdahlA. (2008) ‘Norm Advocacy: A Small State Strategy to Influence the EU’, Journal of European Public Policy15: 135–54.
8.
BörzelT. A.RisseT. (2000) ‘When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change’, European Integration on-line Papers4 (15). Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm.
9.
BullB. (2008) ‘Policy Networks and Business Participation in Free Trade Negotiations in Chile’, Journal of Latin American Studies40: 195–224.
DankovaH. (2003) ‘Regional Cooperation in the European Union – Benelux and Visegrad’, Internet Magazine Visegrad.Info Visegrad Group. Available at: http://www.visegrad.info.
12.
DeitelhoffN. (2009) ‘The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case’, International Organization63: 33–65.
13.
DimitrovaA.ToshkovD. (2007) ‘The Dynamics of Domestic Coordination of EU Policy in the New Member States: Impossible to Lock In?’ West European Politics30: 961–86.
14.
DürA.MateoG. (2010) ‘Bargaining Power and Negotiation Tactics: The Negotiations on the EU’s Financial Perspective, 2007–13’, Journal of Common Market Studies48: 557–78.
15.
ElgströmO.BjurulfB.JohanssonJ.SannerstedtA. (2001) ‘Coalitions in European Union Negotiations’, Scandinavian Political Studies24: 111–28.
16.
ElgströmO.JönssonC. (2000) ‘Negotiating in the European Union: Bargaining or Problem-Solving?’ Journal of European Public Policy7: 684–704.
17.
GoetzK. H. (2005) ‘The New Member States and the EU: Responding to Europe’, in SimonBulmerChristianLequesne (eds) The Member States of the European Union, 254–80. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
HägeF. (2008) ‘Who Decides in the Council of the European Union?’ Journal of Common Market Studies46: 533–58.
19.
HanfK.SoetendorpB. (eds) (1998) Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union. London: Longman.
20.
HeyJ. A. K. (2003) Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
21.
HoogheL. (2002) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe. Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
IngebritsenC.NeumannI.GstoehlS.BeyerJ. (2006) Small States in International Relations. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
23.
KassimH.PetersB. G.WrightV. (2000) ‘Introduction’, in KassimHusseinMenonAnandPetersB. GuyWrightVincent (eds) The National Co-ordination of EU Policy. The Domestic Level, 1–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
KatzensteinP. J. (1985) Small States in World Markets. Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
25.
LaffanB.O’MahonyJ. (2008) Ireland and the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
26.
LewisJ. (2005) ‘The Janus Face of Brussels: Socialization and Everyday Decision Making in the European Union’, International Organization59: 937–71.
27.
LindahlR.NaurinD. (2009) ‘Out in the Cold? Flexible Integration and the Political Status of Euro-Outsiders’, SIEPS: European Policy Analysis13.
28.
MaesI.VerdunA. (2005) ‘Small States and the Creation of EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, Pace-setters and Gate-keepers’, Journal of Common Market Studies43: 327–48.
29.
MagnetteP.NicolaidisK. (2005) ‘Coping With the Lilliput Syndrome: Large vs Small States in the European Convention’, European Public Law11: 83–102.
30.
MilesL. (2002) ‘Small States and the European Union: Reflections’, Current Politics and Economics in Europe11: 91–8.
31.
MoravcsikA. (1998) The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose & State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY and New York: Cornell University Press.
32.
NaurinD. (2009) ‘Most Common When Least Important: Deliberation in the European Council of Ministers’, British Journal of Political Science40: 31–50.
33.
NaurinD.LindahlR. (2008) ‘East, North, South. Coalition-Building in the Council Before and After Enlargement’, in DanielNaurinHelenWallace (eds) Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels, 64–78. Houndmills: Palgrave.
34.
NaurinD.WallaceH., eds (2008) Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels. Houndmills: Palgrave.
35.
NeumannI. B.GstöhlS. (2006) ‘Introduction. Lilliputians in Gulliver’s World?’ in IngebritsenChristineNeumannIver B.GstoehlSieglindeBeyerJessica (eds) Small States in International Relations, 3–36. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
36.
PahreR. (2001) ‘Most-Favored-Nation Clauses and Clustered Negotiations’, International Organization55: 859–90.
37.
PankeD. (2010a) ‘Developing Good Instructions in No Time – An Impossibility? Comparing Domestic Coordination Practises for EU Policies of 19 Small and Medium-Sized States’, West European Politics33: 769–89.
38.
PankeD. (2010b) Small States in the European Union: Coping with Structural Disadvantages. Farnham: Ashgate.
39.
RisseT. (2000) ‘“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization54: 1–39.
40.
SteinmetzR.WivelA. eds (2010) Small States in Europe. Challenges and Opportunities. Farnham: Ashgate.
41.
TallbergJ. (2003) ‘The Agenda-shaping Powers of the EU Council Presidency’, Journal of European Public Policy10: 1–19.
42.
TallbergJ. (2008) ‘Bargaining Power in the European Council’, Journal of Common Market Studies46: 685–708.
43.
ThomsonR.StokmanF. N.AchenC. H.KoenigT., eds (2006) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
ThorhallssonB. (2000) The Role of Small States in the European Union. Aldershot: Ashgate.
45.
ThorhallssonB. (2006) ‘The Role of Small States in the European Union’, in IngebritsenChristineNeumannIver B.GstoehlSieglindeBeyerJessica (eds) Small States in International Relations, 218–27. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
46.
ThorhallssonB.WivelA. (2006) ‘Small States in the European Union: What Do We Know and What Would We Like to Know?’ Cambridge Review of International Affairs19: 651–68.
47.
TiilikainenT. (2006) ‘Finland – An EU Member with a Small State Identity’, Journal of European Integration28: 73–87.
48.
TrondalJ. (2004) ‘Re-socializing Civil Servants. The Transformative Powers of EU Institutions’, Acta Politica39: 4–30.
49.
TrondalJ. (2010) An Emergent Executive Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50.
TrondalJ.VeggelandF. (2003) ‘Access, Voice and Loyalty’, Journal of European Public Policy10: 59–77.
51.
VitalD. (1971) The Survival of Small States: Studies in Small Power/Great Power Conflict. London: Oxford University Press.
