Crawford, Robert M. A. and Jarvis, Darryl S. L. eds (2001) International Relations: Still an American Social Science? Towards Diversity in International Thought. Albany: SUNY Press .
2.
Gong, Gerrit W. (1984) The Standard of ‘Civilisation’ in International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
3.
Holsti, K. J. (1985) The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman .
4.
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus (1999) “‘Civilization” on Trial’ , Millennium: Journal of International Studies28: 141-153 .
5.
Said, Edward (2002) ‘Traveling Theory Reconsidered’, in Reflections on Exile and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
6.
Smith, Steve (2002) ‘The United States and the Discipline of International Relations: “hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline”’ , International Studies Review4: 67-68 .
7.
Wæver, Ole (1998) ‘The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’ , International Organization52: 687-727 .
