Sweden's decision to choose neutrality as its security policy orientation in the first half of the nineteenth century is explained with the help of image theory. It is argued that a theory focusing on the images of policy-makers regarding self, others and situation provides a better explanation of these strategic decisions than traditional balance-of-power theories. The important role of enemy-images is emphasized, as is the particular impact of images in times of uncertainty.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bjöl, E.
(1971) `The Small State in International Politics', in T. L. Schou and A. O. Brundland (eds) Small States in International Relations. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wicksell.
2.
Bridge, F. R.
and Bullen, R. (1980) The Great Powers and the European States System1815-1914. London and New York: Longman.
3.
Cottam, M. L.
(1983) Cognitive Limitations and Foreign Policy Decision-Making. University of California, Los Angeles (diss.).
4.
Cottam, M. L.
(1992) `Recent Developments in Political Psychology', in M. L. Cottam and S. Chih-yu (eds) Contending Dramas. A Cognitive Approach to International Organizations. New York/Westport/London: Praeger.
5.
Elman, M. F.
(1995) `The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard', British Journal of Political Science25 (part 2): 171-217.
6.
Elgström, O.
(1982) Aktiv utrikespolitik. Lund: Studentlitteratur (diss.).
7.
Elgström, O.
(2000) Images and Strategies for Autonomy. Explaining Swedish Security Policy Strategies in the 19th Century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8.
Elgström, O.
and Jerneck, M. (1997) `Activism and Adaptation', Diplomacy and Statecraft8(3): 210-236.
9.
Eriksson, S.
(1940) Oscar I:s sista propaganda för svensk-dansk uníon', Svensk Tidskrift, 666-674.
10.
Fox, A. B.
(1959) The Power of Small States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Goldmann, K.
(1979) `Tension Between the Strong, and the Power of the Weak: Is the Relation Positive or Negative?' in K. Goldmann and G. Sjöstedt (eds) Power, Capabilities, Interdependence. Beverly Hills/London: SAGE.
12.
Goldmann, K.
(1988) Change and Stability in Foreign Policy. The Problems and Possibilities of Détente. New York/London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
13.
Goldstein, J.
and Keohane, R. O. (1993) `Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework', in J. Goldstein and R. O. Keohane (eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy. Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, pp. 3-30. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
14.
Hall, P. A.
and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996) `Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms', Political StudiesXLIV: 936-957.
15.
Hallendorff, C.
(1918) Oscar I, Napoleon och Nikolaus. Ur diplomaternas privatbrev under Krimkriget. Stockholm: Gebers.
16.
Handel, M.
(1990) Weak States in the International System. London: Frank Cass.
17.
Hedin, E.
(1922) `Sveriges ställning i förhållande till Ryssland och västmakterna år 1863', Historisk Tidskrift, ss. 1-35.
18.
Hermann, M. G.
and Kegley, C. W. Jr (1995) `Rethinking Democracy and International Peace: Perspectives from Political Psychology', International Studies Quarterly39: 511-533.
19.
Holsti, O.
(1976) `Foreign Policy Formation Viewed Cognitively', in R. Axelrod (ed.) Structure of Decisions. The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20.
Höjer, T.
(1954) Den svenska utrikespolitikens historia. del III:2. Stockholm: Norstedts.
21.
Höjer, T.
(1960) Carl XIV Johan. Konungatiden. Stockholm: Norstedts.
22.
Jansson, A.
(1961) Den svenska utrikespolitikens historia, del III: 3. Stockholm: Norstedts.
23.
Jervis, R.
(1976) Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
Kennedy, P.
(1989) The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers. London: Fontana Press.
25.
Labs, E. J.
(1992) `Do Weak States Bandwagon?'Security Studies1(3): 383-416.
26.
Legro, J. W.
(1997) `Which Norms Matter? Revisiting the “Failure” of Internationalism', International Organization51(1): 31-63.
27.
Lundh, L.
(1950) Från skandinavism till neutralitet. Utrikespolitik och utrikesdebatt i Sverige under Carl XVs sista år. Trollhättan: Trollhättans tryckeri (diss).
28.
Mathisen, T.
(1971) The Functions of Small States in the Strategies of the Great Powers. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
29.
Morgan, P.
(1977) Deterrence. A Conceptual Analysis. Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi: SAGE.
30.
Munch-Petersen, T.
(1996) `The Policy of 1812: Swedish Foreign Policy from the Congress of Vienna to the Outbreak of the Crimean War', Northern Studies31: 37-55.
31.
Oscar II
(1962) Mina memoarer III. Stockholm: Nordstedts.
32.
Palmstierna, C. F.
(1932) Sverige, Ryssland och England 1833-1855. Kring Novembertraktatens förutsättningar. Stockholm: Norstedts.
33.
Reiter, D.
(1996) Crucible of Beliefs. Learning, Alliances, and World Wars. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
34.
Risse-Kappen, T.
(1995) `Democratic Peace — Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument', European Journal of International Relations1(4): 491-517.
35.
Rothstein, R. L.
(1968) Alliances and Small Powers. New York/London: Columbia University Press.
36.
Runeberg, C. M. (1934) Sveriges politik under Krimkriget. Neutralitetsförklaringen 1853-1854. Ekenäs (diss).
37.
Russet, B.
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
Shimko, K.
(1991) Images and Arms Control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
39.
Söderhjelm, A.
and Palmstierna, C. F. (1944) Oscar I. Stockholm: Bonniers.
40.
Taylor, A. J. P.
(1954) The Struggle for Mastery in Europe 1848-1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
Vital, D.
(1967) The Inequality of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Walt, S. M.
(1985) `Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Powers', International Security9(4).
43.
Walt, S. M.
(1991) `Alliance Formation in Southwest Asia: Balancing and Bandwagoning in Cold War Competition', in R. Jervis and J. Snyder (eds) Dominoes and Bandwagons. Strategic Beliefs and Great Power Competition in the Eurasian Rimland. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44.
Walt, S. M.
(1992) `Alliances, Threats, and U.S. Grand Strategy: A Reply to Kaufman and Labs', Security Studies1(3): 448-482.
45.
Waltz, K. N.
(1959) Man, the State, and War. A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
Waltz, K. N.
(1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
47.
Yee, A. S.
(1996) `The Causal Effect of Ideas on Policies', International Organization50(1): 69-108.
48.
Zürn, M.
(1998) `The Rise of International Environmental Politics: A Review of Current Research', World Politics50(4): 617-649.
