Duverger's law is an unusually simple and specific elaboration on exactly how political institutions “matter”: It proposes that plurality rule elections result in two-party competition. Canada is commonly thought to violate the law at the national level, but to match its predictions at the district level, and thus not to constitute a genuine counterexample. In fact, analysis of a vast data set of Canadian election returns reveals that these elections are multicandidate events, district by district, year after year. An explanation for this multipartyism may lie in the complicating factor of federalism, because Canadian provinces often feature strikingly different national and provincial party systems. Generally, the Canadian case illustrates that theories relating party systems to electoral law but not to other institutions are unrealistically parsimonious.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baltagi, Badi H. (1995). Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
2.
Bell, David V. J. , & Fletcher, Frederick J. (Eds.). (1991). Reaching the voter: Constituency campaigning in Canada. Toronto: RCERPF/Dundurn.
3.
Blais, André , & Carty, R. K. (1991). The psychological impact of electoral laws: Measuring Duverger's elusive factor. British Journal of Political Science, 21(1), 79-93.
4.
Blake, Donald E. (1985). Two political worlds: Parties and voting in British Columbia. Vancouver: UBC.
5.
Canada . (1980). History of the federal electoral ridings, 1867-1980. Ottawa: Queen's Printer/Canadian Library of Parliament Information and Reference Branch.
6.
Canada . (Various, 1935-1993). Report of the chief electoral officer. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services/Elections Canada.
7.
Carty, R. Kenneth . (1991). Canadian political parties in the constituencies. Toronto: RCERPF/Dundurn.
8.
Chhibber, Pradeep , & Kollman, Ken. (1998). Party aggregation and the number of parties in India and the United States. American Political Science Review, 92 (2), 329-342.
9.
Cox, Gary W. (1994). Strategic voting equilibria under the single nontransferable vote. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 608-621.
10.
Dobell, W. M. (1986). Updating Duverger's law. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 585-595.
11.
Dubin, Michael J. (Ed.). (1998). United States congressional elections, 1788-1997: The official results. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
12.
Duverger, Maurice . (1978). Political parties. London: Methuen. (Original work published 1964)
13.
Erikson, Robert S. , & Filippov, Mikhail G. (1996, August). Ideological balancing in elections: The case of Canada. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
14.
Fedderson, Timothy J. (1992). A vote model implying Duverger's law and positive turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 36(4), 938-962.
15.
Fedderson, Timothy J. , Sened, Itai, & Wright, Stephen G. (1990). Rational voting and candidate entry under plurality rule. American Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 1005-1016.
16.
Feigert, Frank . (1989). Canada votes: 1935-1988. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Fey, Mark . (1997). Stability and coordination in Duverger's law: A formal model of preelection polls and strategic voting. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 135-147.
18.
Hickman, John . (1992). The effect of open seats on challenger strength in Japanese Lower House elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17(4), 573-584.
19.
Johnston, Richard . (1980). Federal and provincial voting: Contemporary patterns and historical evolution. In David J. Elkins & Richard Simeon (Eds.), Small worlds: Provinces and parties in Canadian political life (pp. 131-178). Toronto: Methuen.
20.
Johnston, Richard , Blais, André, Brady, Henry E., & Crête, Jean. (1992). Letting the people decide: Dynamics of a Canadian election. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
Laakso, Markku , & Taagepera, Rein. (1979). “Effective” number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12(1), 3-27.
22.
Ledyard, John O. (1984). The pure theory of large two-candidate elections. Public Choice, 44(1), 7-41.
23.
Ledyard, John O. (1989). Information aggregation in two-candidate elections. In Peter C. Ordeshook (Ed.), Models of strategic choice in politics (pp. 7-30). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
Lijphart, Arend . (1994). Electoral systems and party systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
Mitchell, David J. (1995). W.A.C. Bennett and the rise of British Columbia (2nd ed.). Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre. (Original work published 1983)
26.
Ordeshook, Peter C. , & Shvetsova, Olga V. (1994). Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science, 38 (1), 100-123.
27.
Palfrey, Thomas R. (1989). A mathematical proof of Duverger's law. In Peter C. Ordeshook (Ed.), Models of strategic choice in politics (pp. 69-91). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28.
Rae, Douglas W. (1967). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29.
Rallings, Colin , & Thrasher, Michael. (Eds.). (1993). Britain votes 5: British parliamentary election results 1988-1992. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
30.
Riker, William H. (1976). The number of political parties. Comparative Political Studies, 9(1), 93-106.
31.
Riker, William H. (1982). The two-party system and Duverger's law: An essay on the history of political science. American Political Science Review, 76(4), 753-766.
32.
Sartori, Giovanni . (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Scarrow, Howard A. (1960). Federal-provincial voting patterns in Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 26(2), 289-298.
34.
Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.
35.
Taagepera, Rein , & Grofman, Bernard. (1985). Rethinking Duverger's law: Predicting the effective number of parties in plurality and PR systems—Parties minus issues equals one. European Journal of Political Research, 13(4), 341-352.
36.
Taagepera, Rein , & Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (1989). Seats and votes: The effects and determinants of electoral systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
Taagepera, Rein , & Shugart, Matthew Soberg. (1993). Predicting the number of parties: A quantitative model of Duverger's mechanical effect. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 455-464.
38.
Wildgen, John K. (1971). The measurement of hyperfractionalization. Comparative Political Studies, 4(2), 233-243.
39.
Wildgen, John K. (1972). Electoral formulae and the number of parties. Journal of Politics, 34(3), 943-950.
